I have seen no stronger proof that the federal government, CIA, monopoly media are terrifyingly monstrous organized crime

[Everyman]

Fred,

You can't stop Zionist internet agents from spreading their racist violence
doctrines by telling them to "seek help." Wolfowitz, Perle, Kissinger,
Rumsfeld and the billionaires and trillionaires who hold them on retainer
are
not going to seek help because sane Fred G_____ recommends it to them.

They did 9-11 to get the wars they wanted and to get your gentile sons
and daughters to do the killing and dying for them. They control this
country psychologically and their shills on the internet are part of
the coverup and selling program.

You can't tell them to "seek help" and expect it to do any good. You
must work for the awakening of the good quiet people to rise up and
pull these murdering lyers down on obstruction of justice charges.

Meanwhile, here is something to clear your head of Zionist smoke:

--------------------

Articles:


TOO LITTLE TOO LATE

http://online.wsj.com/article_email/0,,SB105821991056891800,00.html
An unusual manifesto is circulating through the e-mail boxes of
prominent Washingtonians from an ad hoc group calling itself the
"Committee for the Republic." Its five sponsors include conservative
C. Boyden Gray, a White House lawyer in the first Bush administration;
Chas. W. Freeman, a former ambassador to Saudi Arabia; and Stephen
Cohen, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution.


===========

Senate Republicans on Wednesday defeated calls by Democrats for an
independent commission to examine intelligence President Bush used to
justify the Iraq invasion, and to force him to disclose costs and
plans to stabilize postwar Iraq.

http://tinyurl.com/h7a1

==============

Who's Who on the 9/11 "Independent" Commission
by Michel Chossudovsky
GO HERE FOR FULL STORY AND LINKS:
http://globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO307B.html


(Cont'd) Lee H. Hamilton Vice Chair
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO307B.html

"Representation" on the Commission:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO307B.html

===================

http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,465137,00.html
Inside the Bush Administration's feud with the diplomat who poured
cold water on the Iraq-uranium connection. ... Former Ambassador
Joseph C. Wilson raised the Administration's ire with an op-ed piece
in The New York Times on July 6 charging that the Administration had
"twisted" intelligence to "exaggerate" the Iraqi threat.

================


Climate of Fear: Sexual Violence and Abduction of Women and Girls in
Baghdad," Full Report available:
In HTML format
http://hrw.org/reports/2003/iraq0703/

==============

Rumsfeld Operated His Own Spy Ring
http://disc.server.com/discussion.cgi?id=149495;article=42254;title=APFN

==============

http://www.hereinreality.com/carlyle.html
How will President George W. Bush personally make millions (if not
billions) from the War on Terror and Iraq? The old fashioned way.
He'll inherit it.
Meet The Carlyle Group
Former World Leaders and Washington Insiders Making Billions in the
War on Terrorism ....
It is hard to imagine an address closer to the heart of American
power. The offices of the Carlyle Group are on Pennsylvania Avenue in
Washington DC, midway between the White House and the Capitol
building, and within a stone's throw of the headquarters of the FBI
and numerous government departments. The address reflects Carlyle's
position at the very center of the Washington establishment, but amid
the frenetic politicking that has occupied the higher reaches of that
world in recent weeks, few have paid it much attention. Elsewhere, few
have even heard of it...

But since the start of the "war on terrorism", the firm - unofficially
valued at $13.5bn - has taken on an added significance. Carlyle has
become the thread which indirectly links American military policy in
Afghanistan to the personal financial fortunes of its celebrity
employees, not least the current president's father. And, until
earlier this month, Carlyle provided another curious link to the
Afghan crisis: among the firm's multi-million-dollar investors were
members of the family of Osama bin Laden More...

==================

Iraq: Insecurity Driving Women Indoors
http://www.hrw.org/press/2003/07/iraq071603.htm
The insecurity plaguing Baghdad and other Iraqi cities has a distinct
and debilitating impact on the daily lives of women and girls,
preventing them from participating in public life at a crucial time in
their country's history, Human Rights Watch said in a report released
today.

==================

Challenge: Anyone who is willing to argue the evidence against my
claim of solid incontrovertable proof that the attack on the Pentagon
was an inside-job black-op mass-murder frameup by "neo-conservative"
zionist operatives in the Defense Department -- I will debate you in
a special thread on these newsgroups -- I only ask that you be willing
to share your evidence and argue the merits of your case yourself from
the evidence. Right now exactly no one is making any new counter
arguments to replace the once refuted by the "small-killer-jet"
evidence. -- Dick Eastman

review the evidence for the small-killer jet here:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/9-11-demonstrative-evidence-of-frameup/message
s

and here:

http://www.apfn.org/apfn/77_deastman1.htm
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/77_deastman2.htm
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/77_deastman3.htm

===================

DO YOU REMEMBER THIS: "THEY HATE US BECAUSE OF OUR FREEDOMS" ?

911 : nearly two years and two wars later ...............
by "Ethic"
( sorry for my poor English language )
It was to be ** The largest criminal investigation in the history of
the nation **

On September 11, 2001, when most were too numb to contemplate much of
anything, Newsweek told us what
to expect.
"As a small army of fire fighters struggled to put out the flames at
the World Trade Center in New York and at the Pentagonin Washington,"
Peg Tyre wrote : "federal law enforcement
agencies had already begun marshaling agents, readying them for what
promises to be the largest criminal investigation in the history of
the nation."
[ http://www.msnbc.com/news/627334.asp?0sp=w12b7&cp1=1 ]

Nearly two years (and two wars) later, however, this huge
investigation hasn't panned out. Attempts to uncover intelligence
failures have been routinely thwarted; Halliburton has accomplished
more in Afghanistan
http://www.corpwatch.org/issues/PID.jsp?articleid=2471 ]

and Iraq [ http://money.cnn.com/2003/04/11/news/companies/war_halliburton
] than Bush's " DEAD or ALIVE " doctrine; and sadly, the CIA's
"spectacular attack" pertains not only to the trauma of 9/11, but to
subsequent assaults on Americans' faith and trust.

Regardless how anyone frames it, the White House duped us. From "THEY
HATE US FOR OUR FREEDOMS" to "SOLID
EVIDENCE" of Al-Qaeda/Iraq connections, the Administration skirted
some issues and manipulated information on others.

In short, Bush Inc. lied and pressured others to do the same. The
game plan succeeded, however, as polls repeatedly indicated that more
than half of all U.S. citizens were consistently conned
into believing Iraq was an immediate threat and that Saddam was
involved in the Sept. 11 attacks.
More :
http://www.buzzflash.com/farrell/03/07/01.html
The Attack Has Been Spectacular by Maureen Farrell Maureen Farrell is
a writer and media consultant who specializes in helping other writers
get television and radio exposure.
© Copyright 2003, Maureen Farrell

FAIR USE NOTICE : This post contains copyrighted material the use
of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. I am making such material available in an effort to advance
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. I believe this
constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided
for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with
Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107
______________________________________________________

Nearly two years and two wars later, the Bush Gang is promoting
its reconstruction efforts, what means getting business oppotunities
to the Bush Gang' friends such as : Unocal; CentGas; Betchel and
Donald Rumsfield; Halliburton, George Schulz and Dick Cheney;
Chevron and Condoleeza Rice; pharmaceutical companies and
Ayatollah John Ashcroft; Boots & Coots; KBR; DynCorp;
Carlyle Group; Georges Bush Senior and the G. W. Bush' Gang
who both get great returns ( % ) from every market
(even % over armaments ! ) Isn't it great ?

* Ethic *

( sorry for my poor English language )
=======================



It was President Bush, that paragon of accountability, who first
pointed the finger at the director of central intelligence (DCI) and
complained, in effect: "He made me say it." It was left to the
national security advisor, Condoleezza Rice, to put in the stiletto
and twist it.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,999258,00.html

===============

Muslim, Zionist: Is There a Federal Double Standard?
http://www.arabia.com/newsfeed/article/english/0,14183,407055,00.html

==============

Waxman Letter: 'Punish Those Who Misled'
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/071703A.shtml

Cheney Under Pressure to Quit Over False War Evidence
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/071703B.shtml

Iraq Pressure on Bush Mounts as U.S. Soldier Killed
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/071703C.shtml

Tour of Duty or Deplorable Deployment?
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/071703D.shtml

Bush Faced Dwindling Data on Iraq Nuclear Bid
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/071703E.shtml

Showdown Nears Over Terrorism Detentions
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/071703F.shtml

Three Essential Errors Committed in Iraq
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/071703G.shtml

CIA: Assessment of Syria's WMD Exaggerated
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/071703H.shtml

Grassroots Uprising Fights to Protect Rights and Freedoms
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/071703I.shtml

====================

Wolfowitz committee instructed White House to use Iraq/uranium
reference in State of the Union speech --by Jason Leopold "A Pentagon
committee led by Paul Wolfowitz, the Deputy Secretary of Defense,
advised George W. Bush to include a reference in his January State of
the Union address about Iraq trying to purchase 500 tons of uranium
from Niger to bolster the case for war in Iraq, despite the fact that
the CIA warned Wolfowitz's committee that the information was
unreliable, according to a CIA intelligence official and four members
of the Senate's intelligence committee who have been investigating the
issue."

--------------------------
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,999737,00.html
According to former Bush officials, all defence and intelligence
sources, senior administration figures created a shadow agency of
Pentagon analysts staffed mainly by ideological amateurs to compete
with the CIA and its military counterpart, the Defence Intelligence
Agency.

The agency, called the Office of Special Plans (OSP), was set up by
the defence secretary, Donald Rumsfeld, to second-guess CIA
information and operated under the patronage of hardline conservatives
in the top rungs of the administration, the Pentagon and at the White
House, including Vice-President Dick Cheney.

The ideologically driven network functioned like a shadow government,
much of it off the official payroll and beyond congressional
oversight. But it proved powerful enough to prevail in a struggle with
the State Department and the CIA by establishing a justification for
war.

Mr Tenet has officially taken responsibility for the president's
unsubstantiated claim in January that Saddam Hussein's regime had been
trying to buy uranium in Africa, but he also said his agency was under
pressure to justify a war that the administration had already decided
on.

==================

NEO-CONS HAVE DONE US A FAVOR... AND DON'T EVEN KNOW IT
Well, let me put it this way. Those deceiving, nation-wrecking
sonsabitches didn't mean to do us any favors, but it turned out that
way. And there isn't a damn thing they can do about it.
http://www.etherzone.com/2003/moor071703.shtml


====================

Peaceful Warrior

Chris Strohm is a freelance reporter and volunteer with the DC
Independent Media Center. Ingrid Drake is a correspondent for Pacifica
Radio's Peacewatch program.
http://www.tompaine.com/feature2.cfm/ID/8341

As the U.S. occupation of Iraq extends with no end in sight, and the
death toll for both U.S. soldiers and Iraqi civilians continues to
mount, more voices of dissent from military personnel and families are
surfacing every day.

One of the most poignant so far comes from a young Marine who gave an
interview with Pacifica Radio's Peacewatch program the night before he
was deployed to Iraq. He discussed his strong commitment to peace, and
said the Bush administration was violating constitutional principles
and misleading the country into an unjust war.

He was killed in late June, fighting a war he didn't believe in.

Because the interview was given under the condition of anonymity, and
out of respect for the current wishes of his family, the Marine will
be identified in this story only as John (not his real name). John's
friends describe him as a passionate, intense person with an
insatiable appetite for knowledge and a commitment to peace. He
studied philosophy and peace with an emphasis on Middle Eastern
affairs, particularly Iraq and Israel.

His friends say he went into the military under the Clinton
administration to gain credibility, so that perhaps someday his
beliefs on how to build a lasting peace in the Middle East would be
taken seriously. In the months before his deployment, he helped
organize anti-war campaigns, mainly working behind the scenes.

In his interview with Pacifica, John expressed outrage that a
legitimate public debate on the war had not occurred. Many
alternatives to combat were available, he explained, such as using
money being spent for war to finance a grassroots Iraqi democracy
movement that would rival the Baath regime, or promoting democracy
throughout the Middle East to show people alternative forms of
government.

"It is almost unimaginable to expect that this war is going to create
a better peace for anybody with the exception of a very small
percentage of people," he said.

He accused the administration of not talking honestly with the
American public about potential consequences of a U.S. war on Iraq,
such as the potential for urban combat, the psyche of the Iraqi
people, the impact on the United Nations and the fate of the Middle
East.

"This could have repercussions in terms of the war on terrorism," he
said. "It could have repercussions on international diplomacy. It
could have repercussions on the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. It could
have repercussions in terms of our ability to get anything else done
in the United Nations. And even if... everything goes the way it's
supposed to go, what does that mean for the world order? It says that
we basically can do whatever we want to do whenever we want to do it
because we are the world's sole superpower."

But even as he expressed doubts about the Bush administration's
decision, he spoke eloquently about his patriotism, and looked to the
highest ideals of the country for inspiration:

"I believe in the United States. I believe in the Constitution. I
think it's perhaps one of the greatest documents ever written. I
believe in the idea that we the people are sovereign and we determine
our own destiny. We have a democracy and the Bill of Rights and
freedom of expression, freedom of speech, freedom of religion and due
process. Until the world is such a place that we can really live
without the military, individual Americans have to step up and they
have to serve."

The Bush administration, he claimed, had not made a credible case for
war with Iraq, and was violating constitutional principles by sending
troops into combat. He spoke of the Declaration of Independence, and
how its writers vowed to be free of England, where their lives were
ruled and determined by one man. "The constant rhetoric of the
administration is that there's going to be one person who decides when
we go to war," he said, "and that is such a blatant violation of every
constitutional principle that our founding fathers came up with."

"But even beyond that, it's 'we the people' that this nation is
about," he continued. "It isn't about politics or personal agendas or
political agendas or economic agendas. And I believe that this war is
not the right thing for America because it hasn't yet been proven
conclusively that there is a threat to 'we the people' -- and I think
that is the sole determining factor as to whether or not this nation
should ever go to war."

With chilling foresight, John predicted that much could go wrong in a
war with Iraq, saying the outcomes outlined by the administration were
based on highly optimistic and rosy scenarios. He said it was unlikely
that Iraqis would cheer the arrival of a U.S. occupying force, and
that long-term urban combat could be a likely outcome.

Yet he went to Iraq, believing it to be his duty. And continued, even
in the midst of combat, to exercise his belief in nonviolent
resolution. One of his commanders wrote a letter after his death
explaining a situation in which John negotiated a peaceful settlement
to a potentially deadly situation. A group of Baath Party officials
were found inside a house. Because he spoke Arabic, John entered the
house and talked with the officials until he
negotiated a surrender. His actions potentially saved the lives of
both U.S.
soldiers and Iraqis.

In letters home, John described the peace movement as "awesome," and
said he hoped it would grow larger, never relent against the Bush
administration, and help bring an end to the war.

Around June 20, those letters stopped.

As of July 14, 32 American soldiers have died from hostile action
since Bush declared an end to major combat operations in Iraq on May
1, according to the Pentagon. Forty-three other service members have
died in incidents unrelated to hostilities.

Nancy Lessin, co-founder of Military Families Speak Out, says more
people are becoming outraged now that the war against Iraq has turned
into a highly risky occupation.

"Too many U.S. military personnel and way too many innocent Iraqis
have been killed," she says. "And what we predicted to be true has
come true, that there are no weapons of mass destruction. Everything
we said was going to happen is coming to pass, and one of the most
frightening aspects of this is that the people of this country haven't
completely risen up in opposition to what's going on."

Her words are echoed, and answered, by John's. Before he was deployed,
John wrote a final letter as part of his will.

"That I have died means I have failed to achieve the one thing in life
I truly longed to give the world -- peace," the letter reads. "The
plight of human suffering consumed me and I dedicated much to trying
to find the ideas that might lead humankind toward alleviating it for
all. It was a quest which was inextricably intertwined with my quest
for freedom. If you know anything about me you know that. Understand
it and come to understand how the suffering of others tormented my
soul. Then seek to honor my memory by trying to achieve what I could
not."

Andrew Korfhage provided additional reporting for this article.

=================

OPINION POLLSTER WHO SAID BUSH HAD 80 PERCETN APPROVAL A FEW MONTHS
BACK, NOW SAYS MAJORITY OF IRAQIS WANT US TROOPS TO STAY -- WHAT
THIS MEANS OF COURSE IS THAT WOLFOWITZ-PERLE-RUMSFELD-KISSINGER ARE
NOW SHIFTING BLAME FOR THE DEADLY AND CRIMINAL OCCUPATION TO "THE WILL
OF THE IRAQI PEOPLE" -- DO YOU SUPPOSE ARMED SOLDIERS WENT HOUSE
TO HOUSE PROTECTING THE POLLSTERS AS THEY DID THEIR WORK?

=====================

http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/0717/p01s02-woeu.html

WASHINGTON AND LONDON - British Prime Minister Tony Blair speaks to a
joint
session of Congress Thursday as he receives the Congressional Gold
Medal - a
double honor last bestowed on Winston Churchill.

======================


http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/0717/p01s02-woeu.html

WASHINGTON AND LONDON - British Prime Minister Tony Blair speaks to a
joint
session of Congress Thursday as he receives the Congressional Gold
Medal - a
double honor last bestowed on Winston Churchill.

============

CALCUTTA Indian Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee's refusal to send
peacekeeping troops to Iraq should warn President George W. Bush of
the problems that American unilateralism can create for traditionally
non-aligned Asian nations. ..........Vajpayee cannot forget that a
coalition of nationalist, left and Muslim groups, led by the Congress
party, hounded former Prime Minister Chandra Shekhar out of office for
allowing U.S. warplanes to land and refuel at Indian airports during
the first Gulf war.
http://www.iht.com/articles/102968.html

=================

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3284-748050,00.html
It is a prospect to make any sensible person weep: Washington later
today, Tokyo tomorrow evening, Seoul and Beijing on Sunday, Shanghai
and Hong Kong on Tuesday, London on Thursday. Seven cities in eight
days sounds like the itinerary of a deranged tourist, or a CEO who
cannot wait to make use of his new executive jet, but it is actually
the Prime Minister's schedule for the coming week.

=================

The U.S. military's new commander in Iraq acknowledged for the first
time yesterday that American troops are engaged in a "classical
guerrilla-type" war against remnants of former Iraqi president Saddam
Hussein's Baath Party and said Baathist attacks are growing in
organization and sophistication.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A2830-2003Jul16.html?nav=hptop
_tb


===================

Blair waters down claim linking Iraq to Niger uranium
http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/story.jsp?story=425057

======================

http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/story.jsp?story=425053
£131,000 a year - more than any cabinet minister - the Government said
last night -- The bill for ministers' special advisers and spin
doctors has trebled since Labour came to power and now costs the
taxpayer £5.4m a year. The soaring bill has angered MPs who have
questioned the need for so many special advisers, particularly in
Downing Street, where there are 26.

=======================

UK Cost Of Occupation: £5m A Day - Human Life Cost Extra


http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,999719,00.html

========================







George W. Bush once again showed himself to be
unfit to be President of the United States when
answering questions with the United Nations Secretary
General Kofi Annan at a photo opportunity at the
Oval Office on Monday, July 14.?

In reply to a question related to the now discredited
claim that Iraq tried to buy Uranium yellowcake from
Niger, George W. sidetracked with a startling, new
explanation of why Saddam Hussein was removed
from power.

He said, "And we gave him [Saddam Hussein ] a chance
to allow the inspectors in, and he wouldn't let them in.
And, therefore, after a reasonable request, we decided
to remove him from power, along with other nations, so
as to make sure he was not a threat to the United States
and our friends and allies in the region."

The statement is posted at the official White House web site -
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/07/20030714-3.html

This is such an extraordinary perversion of the truth, I am
left flabbergasted, and hardly able to think through what it
actually means that the most powerful nation in the world
is led by a man who so totally twists the facts. For starters,
perhaps George W. Bush was not telling a lie so much
as once again demonstrating an inability to distinguish fact
from fiction, even with regard to actions that he commands.

As I remember it the UN inspectors were in Iraq and the
Iraqi government was providing them with unfettered access
to facilities, even allowing them to dismantle Iraqi missiles,
when they were instructed by the UN Secretary-General
to leave Iraq, just prior to the US-UK invasion.

Here is the full text of the White House reported question and
answer exchange, which ended with the faux pas that must have
made Kofi Annan, for one, wince, without daring to correct
(So what does that say about Kofi Annan? Was boy George
unconsciously daring him to put him right?):

THE PRESIDENT: Yes, Dana, one last question.

Q Mr. President, back on the question of Iraq, and that
specific line that has been in question --

THE PRESIDENT: Can you cite the line? (Laughter.)

Q I could, if you gave me some time.

THE PRESIDENT: When I gave the speech, the line was
relevant.

Q So even though there has been some question about
the intelligence -- the intelligence community knowing
beforehand that perhaps it wasn't, you still believe that
when you gave it --

THE PRESIDENT: Well, the speech that I gave was
cleared by the CIA. And, look, the thing that's important
to realize is that we're constantly gathering data. Subsequent
to the speech, the CIA had some doubts. But when I gave
the -- when they talked about the speech and when they
looked at the speech, it was cleared. Otherwise, I wouldn't
have put it in the speech. I'm not interested in talking about
intelligence unless it's cleared by the CIA. And as Director
Tenet said, it was cleared by the CIA.

The larger point is, and the fundamental question is, did
Saddam Hussein have a weapons program? And the
answer is, absolutely. And we gave him a chance to allow
the inspectors in, and he wouldn't let them in. And,
therefore, after a reasonable request, we decided to
remove him from power, along with other nations, so as
to make sure he was not a threat to the United States
and our friends and allies in the region. I firmly believe
the decisions we made will make America more secure
and the world more peaceful.

[Everyman]

Nico Haupt: Dead Microbiologist Kelly Was Chief At Porton Down Chemical and
Biological Defence Establishment

And Other Articles

=============


7-18-3

Dead Microbiologist Kelly Was Chief At Porton Down
From Nico Haupt
Global Free Press


As GFP found out (last week), ...Kelly was more than just an "adviser to the
Foreign Office". From 1984-1992 he was Head of Microbiology at the Chemical
and Biological Defence Establishment, Porton Down. Kelly was also among the
hardliners who claimed that Iraq had WMD. In October 2001, Kelly claimed,
that in 1985, Iraq obtained Anthrax through a mail order of Virginia-based
American Type Culture Collection. It was not obvious if Kelly was indeed
the BBC Source. Kelly took also part in all trilateral visits to the former
Soviet Union, Russia, the US and the UK. He was Senior Advisor on Biological
Weapons to UNSCOM from 1994--99, and led and participated in many
inspections in Iraq from 1991--98. From 1984-1992 Kelly was Head of
Microbiology at the Chemical and Biological Defence Establishment, Porton
Down. Porton Down, controversial for their Chemical Warfare Experimental
Stations from the 20s to the 50s, was also able to obtain the Anthrax
Spores, which had been used in the October 2001 attacks. Porton Down,
directly, and the CIA, indirectly, received their samples of the particular
anthrax spores used in the attacks from the US Army Medical Research
Institute of Infections Diseases at Fort Detrick, about 50 miles north of
Washington.
Since the First World War, the Chemical and Biological Defence Establishment
at Porton Down carried out experiments on volunteers to understand better
the effects of chemical agents that might be used against British troops in
warfare and improve protective measures. In the 90s, Porton Down's
cooperation with the British Government became stronger again and ended
basically in a merger:
By 1991 the Chemical Defence Establishment of Porton Down became the
Chemical and Biological Defence Establishment and was one of the six new
Defence Support Agencies. In 1995, the Establishment became part of the
Defence Evaluation and Research Agency (DERA), an executive agency of MOD
evolved in 1994 from proposals of the "Front Line First Defence Cost
Studies. In 2001, DERA split into two organisations: QinetiQ, a private
company, and DSTL (Defence Science and Technology Laboratory), which remains
an agency of MOD. Porton Down is now known as DSTL, Porton Down. Today,
Dstl delivers defence research, specialist technical services and the
ability to track global technological developments.

In July 2002, the Carlyle Group took a 34% stake in QinetiQ

===============

Also:

Dead UK Advisor Was BBC Source For Blair Criticisms on Iraq
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/072103I.shtml


--------

The torment of a man who knew too much
(SNIP)
According to Professor Julian Perry Robinson, Britain's most senior and
respected expert on chemical weapons and a friend and colleague of Dr
Kelly, these experiences hardened him. It seems unlikely that a man with
his background would have been driven to suicide by one or two bumptious
members of the parliamentary Foreign Affairs Committee, unpleasant though
he clearly found his public grilling by the MPs.

Friends and fellow scientists have speculated that he came under heavy
pressure in Whitehall once he had admitted giving an unauthorised interview
to Andrew Gilligan, the BBC journalist. But he was an experienced
bureaucrat who had been spied on and bullied by far more menacing people
than the mandarins of the Ministry of Defence.
FULL STORY:
http://disc.server.com/discussion.cgi?id=149495;article=42379;title=APFN

Blair on brink as Kelly family point finger - Neil Macka


Kelly death 'changes everything' BBC News - BBC NEWS, Sat Jul 19 16:01


EXCELLENT HIGHLIGHTS ON DR KELLY'S COURAGE AND TOUGHNESS. - PAUL, Sat Jul 19
22:33


Oral evidence - DR DAVID KELLY, Special Adviser to the Direc - BBC, Sat Jul
19


Journalists 'must protect whistleblowers' - BBC News

=================================================

Bush deserves to be impeached
http://www.canoe.ca/Columnists/margolis_jul20.html

===============================


Media Leviathan, U.S. Intelligence Form Secret Cabal


http://www.americanfreepress.net/

http://www.americanfreepress.net/07_11_03/Media_Leviathan/media_leviathan.ht
ml

Media Leviathan, U.S. Intelligence Form Secret Cabal

A quiet gathering of the media's top elites to discuss mergers, with a
keynote address by the head of the CIA, escaped mention in the mainstream
press.

Exclusive to American Free Press

By M. Raphael Johnson

Each year, at the posh ranch of investment banker Herbert Allen Jr., the
world's media elites meet to discuss strategy, possible mergers and
editorial policy. It can only be called a media version of Bilderberg as
government, corporate and media officials are meeting in secret, behind the
usual wall of security.

As always, for all of these meetings that actually matter, leftist protests
are strangely nonexistent, even though it is summertime and colleges are
largely empty.

This year is a bit different, given that the key note speaker is none other
than CIA Director George Tenet.

Tenet's attendance has been likened to the "smoking gun" that researchers
have been looking for, proving the institutional link between finance,
media, government and business.

Like all meetings of this type, it is off limits to reporters, however
ironic it might be for a media confab.

The world's media, whose bosses are attending the gathering, have not
bothered to mention the CIA connection this year, likely the first time the
world's premier intelligence gathering service has been invited to this
media gathering.

One of the main issues this year is the buying up of French media giant
Vivendi, currently run by Jean Bernard Levy (aka Jean Marie Fourtou, among
other names), which controls Universal Studios, according to The New York
Post.

Making bids are Edgar Bronfman, Jr. and Sumner Redstone.

Redstone also has made noises that he is interested in buying CNN.

Bronfman and Barry Diller have held high executive posts in the French
conglomerate in the past, but are now using their connections to buy up the
majority of shares, though some media reports deny that Diller is
interested.

Some have speculated that the "French" corporation is merely another front
for Bronfman and Zionist interests.

Bronfman is the founder of the World Jewish Congress, an organization that
also includes Vladimir Guzinsky who owns the media MOST corporation in
Russia, with major shares being owned by a CIA-conduit, The Washington Post.

CNN founder and billionaire Ted Turner, strangely, was not present, though
it might be noted that in 2002, Turner, in an interview with the British
Guardian newspaper, said "Israel practices terrorism" and the "bombers are
all they [the Palestinians] have."

Major corporate sponsors included Starbucks coffee (with several others
remaining secret) and the Wednesday arrival of Tom Hanks, Candace Bergen and
New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg proves that this is not merely a secretive
place to make deals, but is the very canvas where the American anti-culture
is painted.

Bloomberg's presence is important, for, as mayor of the most powerful city
in the world, he brought in ex-CIA spy David Cohen to become his deputy
commissioner of intelligence, creating a link between the CIA, Bloomberg and
this media conference.

What makes this year different is that the mergers, as mentioned by Redstone
in a recent speech at the confab, is that the FCC has relaxed its
acquisitions laws, as well as the presence of U.S. intelligence.

Of course, Tenet would not have attended unless there is an extant link
between the CIA, mass media and corporate America.

Tenet's presence is not mentioned in any CIA document or press release, nor
is any newspaper reporting it except American Free Press. The only major
mention of Tenet's presence was a brief July 9 statement on Headline News, a
CNN/Bronfman property found on most cable providers.

The same is said for Starbucks and as yet unnamed other corporate sponsors
of the event. Only in that brief report were they mentioned, dropping out of
sight thereafter.

In 1998, when CNN did a story on the United States using nerve gas on
antiwar GIs during Vietnam, CIA operatives made them pull the story.

CNN had turned the story over to several long-time clandestine operatives,
including former head of operations Ted Price. Price's successor was David
Cohen.

On Nov. 11, 2001, The New York Times uncovered a ploy by the Bush
administration to set up "round the clock" "news bureaus" to control the
"message of the day."

Additionally, the same article reported that several dozen major Hollywood
executives met with Karl Rove, President Bush's senior adviser, to find
"common ground on how the entertainment industry can contribute to the war
effort, replicating in spirit if not in scope the partnership formed between
filmmakers and war planners in the 1940s."

Gen. Tommy Franks stated at a press conference on March 25, 2003, that "the
media is a weapon of war."

For many who have never heard of Allen's gatherings, the full institutional
formation of intelligence, business, banking, media and government links is
to control the information that reaches the global public.

Allen's conferences remove such linkages from the realm of "conspiracy
theory" into the realm of real journalism. Not surprisingly, such reports
have yet to surface in the mainstream media.

=================


Death deals devastating blow to Iraq arms hunt

Martin Bright
Sunday July 20, 2003
The Observer

David Kelly was about to lead the British hunt for weapons of mass
destruction in Iraq and had contacted former UN inspectors as recently as
two weeks ago to sound them out about a new mission.
He was acting as the senior British scientific adviser to the Iraq Survey
Group, the body set up by the US Government at the end of May to replace
the United Nations weapons inspection regime.

One former UN inspector, who worked with Kelly on two missions to Iraq in
the Nineties, said he had received an email from the scientist two weeks ago
asking him join the survey group mission. Kelly was working directly under
Brigadier John Deverell, the British second in command of the survey group.


FULL STORY:
http://www.apfn.org/APFN/DKELLY.HTM


===============

Government trying to escape a full inquiry, say Tories --The Government was
accused yesterday of "running scared" of a full investigation into the death
of David Kelly when Tony Blair rejected calls for Parliament to be recalled
to approve the inquiry's terms of reference.
http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/story.jsp?story=426203

============


"Never before in my 40 years of experience in this town has intelligence
been used in so cynical and so orchestrated a way. The Agency analysts that
we are in touch with are disheartened, dispirited, angry. They are
outraged."

- Raymond McGovern, a former CIA analyst and supervisor on the board of
Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity, commenting on forged
intelligence used as a pretext by the Bush administration to plunge America
into war with of Iraq, CBS News, July 19, 2003




Ex-Spies: CIA Workers Outraged

NEW YORK, July 19, 2003




Former CIA analyst Raymond McGovern says U.S. spies are outraged at the Bush
administration's cynical use of intelligence. (Photo: CBS)



"Never before in my 40 years of experience in this town has intelligence
been used in so cynical and so orchestrated a way."
Retired spy Raymond McGovern

View A 2002 Government Report on Iraqi WMD Programs. Includes maps
pinpointing suspected hidden weapons.

2002 Report


(CBS) Before the bombs fell on Baghdad, there were analysts inside the
American intelligence community who were troubled by the U.S. case for war,
reports CBS News Correspondent Jim Acosta.

Raymond McGovern, a former CIA analyst and supervisor, says, "Never before
in my 40 years of experience in this town has intelligence been used in so
cynical and so orchestrated a way."

McGovern is one of several retired intelligence analysts who say they are
speaking out for those who can't inside the CIA.

"The Agency analysts that we are in touch with are disheartened, dispirited,
angry," he says. "They are outraged."

In other developments in the growing controversy over the intelligence
presented to the public to justify the war in Iraq:


A British weapons expert apparently killed himself, sending the government
of Prime Minister Tony Blair deeper into crisis. David Kelly had been put
uncomfortably in the spotlight as British officials have been trying to find
someone to blame for accusations they hyped intelligence about Iraq's
weapons threat. Polls show the British public is losing faith in Blair with
a majority feeling they were misled about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction,
reports CBS News Correspondent Richard Roth.


U.S. intelligence and senior administration officials admit there has been
little new evidence about Iraq's weapons program in the five years since
U.N. inspectors left Iraq, the New York Times reports.


White House officials said Friday that President Bush and his national
security advisor, Condoleezza Rice, did not entirely read the most
authoritative prewar assessment of U.S. intelligence on Iraq, missing a
State Department claim that an allegation Bush would later use in his State
of the Union address was "highly dubious," the Washington Post reports.


Even as the Bush administration concluded Iraq was reviving its nuclear
weapons program, key signs - such as scientific data of weapons work and
evidence of research by Iraq's nuclear experts - were missing, several
former intelligence officials tell the Associated Press.

McGovern says many in the intelligence community feel they're taking the
heat for the failure to find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and for the
uproar over the president's State of the Union speech -- despite warnings
from intelligence officials to some in the administration that the case
against Saddam Hussein's weapons programs was far from air-tight.

Lawrence Korb, former assistant secretary of defense, says, "They were like
lawyers trying to convince a jury. So they took bits and pieces of evidence
to present the best case."

Korb, a former Reagan administration official, says while the president was
presenting a case that appeared crystal clear, intelligence experts saw a
picture that was much more murky.

This is not the first time the United States has gone to war based on facts
that later turned out to be questionable. Almost 40 years ago, President
Johnson pointed to unconfirmed reports of attacks on American ships in the
Gulf of Tonkin to convince the congress to widen the war in Vietnam."

"There's a little inscription in the marble emblazoned at the entrance of
CIA headquarters that says 'You shall know the truth and the truth shall
make you free'," says McGovern.

For some intelligence veterans, the fear is the truth and the reputations of
the people who must find the truth have become casualties of this war.


©MMIII, CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/07/20/iraq/main564106.shtml







Cheney, Forgery and the CIA
Not Business as Usual
By RAY McGOVERN
former CIA Analyst

As though this were normal! I mean the repeated visits Vice President Dick
Cheney made to the CIA before the war in Iraq. The visits were, in fact,
unprecedented. During my 27-year career at the Central Intelligence Agency,
no vice president ever came to us for a working visit.

During the '80s, it was my privilege to brief Vice President George H.W.
Bush and other very senior policy-makers every other morning. I went either
to the vice president's office or (on weekends) to his home. I am sure it
never occurred to him to come to CIA headquarters.

The morning briefings gave us an excellent window on what was uppermost in
the minds of those senior officials and helped us refine our tasks of
collection and analysis. Thus, there was never any need for policy-makers to
visit us. And the very thought of a vice president dropping by to help us
with our analysis is extraordinary. We preferred to do that work without the
pressure that inevitably comes from policy-makers at the table.

Cheney got into the operational side of intelligence as well. Reports in
late 2001 that Iraq had tried to acquire uranium from Niger stirred such
intense interest that his office let it be known he wanted them checked out.
So, with the CIA as facilitator, a retired U.S. ambassador was dispatched to
Niger in February 2002 to investigate. He found nothing to substantiate the
report and lots to call it into question. There the matter rested--until
last summer, after the Bush administration made the decision for war in
Iraq.

Cheney, in a speech on Aug. 26, 2002, claimed that Saddam Hussein had
"resumed his effort to acquire nuclear weapons."

At the time, CIA analysts were involved in a knock-down, drag-out argument
with the Pentagon on this very point. Most of the nuclear engineers at the
CIA, and virtually all scientists at U.S. government laboratories and the
International Atomic Energy Agency, found no reliable evidence that Iraq had
restarted its nuclear weapons program.

But the vice president had spoken. Sad to say, those in charge of the draft
National Intelligence Estimate took their cue and stated, falsely, that
"most analysts assess Iraq is reconstituting its nuclear weapons program."

Smoke was blown about aluminum tubes sought by Iraq that, it turns out, were
for conventional weapons programs. The rest amounted to things like
Hussein's frequent meetings with nuclear scientists and Iraq's foot-dragging
in providing information to U.N. inspectors.

Not much heed was paid to the fact that Hussein's son-in-law, who supervised
Iraq's nuclear program before he defected in 1995, had told interrogators
that Iraq's nuclear capability--save the blueprints--had been destroyed in
1991 at his order. (Documents given to the United States this week confirm
that. The Iraqi scientists who provided them added that, even though the
blueprints would have given Iraq a head start, no order was given to restart
the program; and even had such an order been given, Iraq would still have
been years away from producing a nuclear weapon.)

In sum, the evidence presented in last September's intelligence estimate
fell far short of what was required to support Cheney's claim that Iraq was
on the road to a nuclear weapon. Something scarier had to be produced, and
quickly, if Congress was to be persuaded to authorize war. And so the
decision was made to dust off the uranium-from-Niger canard.

The White House calculated--correctly--that before anyone would make an
issue of the fact that this key piece of "intelligence" was based on a
forgery, Congress would vote yes. The war could then be waged and won. In
recent weeks, administration officials have begun spreading the word that
Cheney was never told the Iraq-Niger story was based on a forgery. I asked a
senior official who recently served at the National Security Council if he
thought that was possible. He pointed out that rigorous NSC procedures call
for a very specific response to all vice presidential questions and added
that "the fact that Cheney's office had originally asked that the Iraq-Niger
report be checked out makes it inconceivable that his office would not have
been informed of the results."

Did the president himself know that the information used to secure
congressional approval for war was based on a forgery? We don't know. But
which would be worse--that he knew or that he didn't?

Ray McGovern, a CIA analyst from 1964 to 1990, regularly reported to the
vice president and senior policy-makers on the President's Daily Brief from
1981 to 1985. He now is co-director of the Servant Leadership School, an
inner-city outreach ministry in Washington. He can be reached at:
***@counterpunch.org.

[Everyman]

"... where naked force battles against naked force ... nothing but power
that can restrain power ... I have no faith in parchment, sir, I have no
faith in the abracadabra of the constitution; I have no faith in it. There
never was a constitution under the sun, in which by the unwise exercise of
the powers of government, the people may not be driven to the extremity of
resistance by force. ... If under a power to regulate trade, you draw the
last drop of blood from our veins; if, secundum artem, you draw the last
shilling from our pockets, what are the checks of the constitution to us? A
fig for the constitution! "

-- John Randolph (1773-1833 -- Senator, Jacksonian Democrat)



Corporate Slush Funds for Baghdad--Plugging Iraq into Globalization
http://www.counterpunch.org/kretzmann07222003.html

US to rule out executions for Aussies detained at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/07/23/1058853139546.html

Sons Are Dead But Saddam and Resistance Lives
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article4196.htm


First Abid Hamid Mahmud, had been captured, and told his interrogators that
he and Saddam's two sons had sought refuge in Syria but were turned
back--later military leans observes a group of cars and trucks headed toward
the Syrian boarder -- immediately Army helicopters and Bradley Fighting
Vehicles attacked two groups of cars, triggering enormous explosions and
fireballs that lit up the night sky -- as many as eighty people--occupants
of the cars and trucks as well as civilians living nearby--were killed. The
vehicles, it turned out, were being used to smuggle gasoline.
http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?030728fa_fact


Amnesty International calls on the CPA to carry out competent, independent
and impartial investigations into these individual cases....
http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGMDE141572003


400,000 Letters to Congress Seek War Evidence Probe
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=politicsNews&storyID=3136483


UK divided over justification for war
http://politics.guardian.co.uk/polls/story/0,11030,1004131,00.html


BBC has a tape of David Kelly expressing serious concern about how Downing
Street made the case for war
http://politics.guardian.co.uk/kelly/story/0,13747,1004165,00.html



Clinton backs Bush on using discredited Iraqi-Africa uranium link as
justification for war in State of the Union Address
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=544&ncid=703&e=3&u=/ap/20030
723/ap_on_go_pr_wh/clinton_iraq


Subcommittee on National Security, Emerging Threats and International
Relations -- their 10 questions for Dick Cheney
http://www.tompaine.com/feature2.cfm/ID/8417/view/print


Tony Blair today hailed the killing of two of Saddam Hussein's sons as
"great news"
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/story.jsp?story=426812


Ariel Sharon: Jewish settlement outposts are an "internal" matter which the
Jewish state will deal with at
its discretion.
http://www.islamonline.net/English/News/2003-07/22/article01.shtml

---


Perhaps you are not aware that Israel and China are allied in the
brain-death and control of the US government -- themselves captive
war-state nations, creatures of the bankers (Rockefeller, Rothschild) and
Triad princelings (Zhou Enlai, Deng, the current leadership) that control
them --- have entirely through black operations reduced the US to a
bankrupt and exhausted basket case universally hated around the world --
and soon comes the biological attack (with no microbiologists left to save
us) and so the irritant of the upstart anti-aristocracy pro-common-man
limited-government repbulic will be gone forever.

Certainly you have detected by now that the US political sphere has been
captured by globalist investment bankers converting government into an
engine for obtaining personal and class advantage, a means for extracting
money and rights from the many to suit the interests of the super rich who
manipulate the system.

Sen. John Randolph (1773-1833) , the political mentor of John C. Calhoun,
spoke to our situation today when he declared that man is corrupt and
that the best hope of sustaining freedom and justice despite that
corruption lies in keeping the hands of the most ambitious and dominant
from the easy fiat power of government which invites corruption. Men can be
trusted to protect their own freedom, but they cannot be trusted to protect
the freedom of others (laissez-faire always ends in monopoly) or to divide
the spoils of their takings evenly or fairly (socialism always ends in
black market and under the table economy which corruption soon consolidates
into -- you guessed it -- monopoly.)

"None but the people can forge their own chains; and to flatter the people
and delude them by promises never meant to be performed is the stale but
successful practice of the demagogue -- With all the fanatical and
preposterous theories about the rights of man (the theories, and not the
rights themselves, I speak of), there is nothing but power that can restrain
power. ... You may entrench yourself in parchment to the teeth, says Lord
Chatham, the sword will find its way to the vitals of the constitution. I
have no faith in parchment, sir, I have no faith in the abracadabra of the
constitution; I have no faith in it. There never was a constitution under
the sun, in which by the unwise exercise of the powers of government, the
people may not be driven to the extremity of resistance by force. ... If
under a power to regulate trade, you draw the last drop of blood from our
veins; if, secundum artem, you draw the last shilling from our pockets, what
are the checks of the constitution to us? A fig for the constitution! When
the scorpion's sting is probing us to the quick, shall we pause to chop
logic? Shall we get some learned cunning clerk to say whether the power to
do this is to be found in the constitution, and then, if he, from whatever
motive, shall maintain the affirmative, like the animal whose fleece forms
so material a part of this bill, quietly lie down and be sheared?

This dolorous flat plain where naked force battles against naked force is
the Ultima Thule (final door --DE) to which all people must come who ignore
altogether the existence of force in politics, as they ignore most other
political realities; it is the Tophet ( a name for hell --DE) that attempt
to treat men as if they were divinely reasonable, competent to legislate
upon abstract grounds. The facile assumption that men may safely be
entrusted with much power over one another had led to the tariff, internal
"improvements," and fanciful schemes of foreign policy, all conspiring to
beggar one part of the nation to the profit of another part. Abstract
sentimentality ends in real brutality. ...

If the constitution cannot be relied upon as a barrier against appetite and
force, if the most capacious human intellects cannot apprehend the way to
manage society, where may security against power be found? Why, in
restricting the scope of government to narrow limits, and in basing all
government, and participation therein, upon practical considerations, rather
than upon the fancies of the philosophes and of Jefferson. Let the objects
of government be few and clearly defined; let all important powers, in
America, be reserved to the states, outside the scope of the federal
authority. Astute lovers of freedom will assert state rights constantly, so
that personal and local liberties may endure; the smaller the unit of
government, the less possibility of usurpation, and the more immediate and
powerful the operation of prescriptive influences. ... I cling to the power
of the several states because in clinging to them, I cling to muy country;
because I love my country as I do my immediate connexions; for the love of
country is nothing more than the love of evey man for his wife, child or
friend. I am not for a policy which must end in the destruction and speedy
destruction too, of the whole of the State Governments."

It was Randolph's ideology that was defeated in the Civil War (the issue of
slavery was secondary -- the south did not succeed to preserve slavery --
the slavery issue was added as a aid to recruitment among northerners who
strongly favored abolition and neither approved of nor understood this, the
conflict between centralized and unchecked power on the one hand and
decentralized and checked power on the other -- the real issue of the war).
And with the fall of the anti-centralization (states rights) power came the
rise of the Robber Barons, the Money Lords who controlled centralized
government for monopoly and power exactly as Randolph warned against
bove -- the same corrupt power that murdered over 2000 Americans on
September 11, 2001 to get the maximum centralization of power under the
Homeland Security Act and the Patriot Act and to give a false justification
for the invasion and conquest of two wholly innocent nations, killing tens
of thousands for yet more money and power.

More on this here:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dick_eastman_populism/

====================


Dr David Kelly - the 18th microbiologist to die mysteriously since November
2001?


Excerpted from the What Matters list:

Inevitably it is being rumoured that Microbiologist David Kelly, 59, may
have been killed.

Dr Kelly's body was found not far from his Oxfordshire home last Friday,
July 18. A few days earlier, he had faced a gruelling questioning by the UK
parliamentary Foreign Affairs Committee about a disputed BBC report in late
May that Downing Street had misused intelligence to beef up the case for
joining the US-led war on Iraq. Kelly denied that he was the main source of
the BBC report, but the BBC has stated that he was their main source.

In a Reuters story by Dominic Evans, David Kelly was described as the
"scientist in the eye of the Iraqi storm" -
http://famulus.msnbc.com/FamulusIntl/reuters07-18-074305.asp?reg=MIDEAST#bod
y

"For seven years in the 1990s, he was a senior member of the United Nations
Special Commission (UNSCOM) charged with dismantling Iraq's banned chemical,
biological and ballistic weapons programmes."

According to television journalist Tom Mangold, David Kelly "was a man whose
brain could boil water - he used words with tremendous precision, he used
them as weapons. There was nothing he didn't know about biological warfare
and there wasn't much he didn't know about weapons of mass destruction.''

Now he is dead; and since yesterday this E-mail message from a Rowena
Thursby - ***@onetel.net.uk - has been doing the rounds: "A friend
of mine has just been in touch with the landlord of Kelly's pub by phone and
he confirms that many in the village who knew Kelly very well, suspect that
his death may not have been suicide. And they have said as much to
journalists. Yet no journalist has reported as much or even raised the
question: 'was it suicide or was it murder?' themselves. Rowena."

Such stories are likely to lead to renewed interest in the spate of 15
mysterious deaths of microbiologists between November, 2001 and March 2002.
For the details of these death see the time-line on "Anthrax Attacks and
Microbiologist Deaths" at
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/timeline/main/AAanthrax.html.

A search of 'microbiologists, mysterious deaths' reveals that there have
been two further mysterious deaths of microbiologists since March 2002; and
now there is that of Dr David Kelly, which will undoubtedly be listed as the
18th, if the independent enquiry that has been set up does not still the
rumours effectively.

The first microbiologist to die in the November 2001 to March 2002 'season'
of mysterious deaths was Dr. Benito Que, 52. He was "an expert in infectious
diseases and cellular biology at the Miami Medical School. Police originally
suspected that he had been beaten on November 12 in a carjacking in the
medical school's parking lot. Strangely enough, though, his body showed no
signs of a beating. Doctors then began to suspect a stroke." [Globe and
Mail, 5/4/02]

Then on November 16, 2002, Dr. Don Wiley, 57, disappeared during a business
trip to Memphis, Tennessee. [Fox News, 11/24/01] He had just bought tickets
to take his son to Graceland the following day. Police found his rental car
on a bridge outside Memphis. His body was later found in the Mississippi
River. Forensic experts said he may have had a dizzy spell and fallen off
the bridge. Police would only say, "We began this investigation as a missing
person investigation. From there it went to a more criminal bent."
[CNN, 11/29/01]

Five days later, world-class microbiologist and high-profile Russian
defector Dr. Vladimir Pasechnik, 64, died of a stroke. Pasechnik, who
defected to Britain in 1989, had played a huge role in the development of
Russian biowarfare, heading a lab of 400 "with an unlimited budget" and "the
best staff available." He says he succeeded
in producing an aerosolized plague microbe that could survive outside the
laboratory. He was connected to Britain's spy agency and recently had
started his own company. "In the last few weeks of his life he had put his
research on anthrax at the disposal of the British] Government, in the light
of the threat from bioterrorism."
[London Times, 11/30/01, New York Times, 11/23/01, Globe and Mail, 5/4/02]

On November 24, 2001 three microbiologists died in a Swissair flight from
Berlin to Zurich. They were Dr. Yaakov Matzner, 54, dean of the Hebrew
University school of medicine; Amiramp Eldor, 59, head of the haematology
department at Ichilov Hospital in Tel Aviv and a world-recognized expert in
blood clotting; and Avishai Berkman, 50, director of the Tel Aviv public
health department and businessman.
[CNN, 11/25/01, Swissair manifest, 11/24/01]

And so it goes on.

In friendship,

Boudewijn Wegerif
http://www.whatmatters.nu



I request readers to engage in help for Tarek Loubani of London, Ontario,
one token innocent man (see below on how) -- Dick Eastman

Support Canadian Palestinian
Peace Activist Tarek Loubani
Arrested and Jailed by the Israeli State for 12 days and counting ...

On July 9, 2003, Tarek Loubani of London, Ontario was arrested and jailed
by the Israeli Occupation Forces (IOF) for his involvement as part of a
peace camp in the Palestinian village of Arrabony, near Jenin.

The peace camp, organized by village inhabitants with the support of the
International Solidarity Movement (ISM), was built to protest the
construction of the Israeli army's "security fence" on Palestinian land.

The fence, known popularly as the "Apartheid Wall", will effectively cut off
Palestinian farmers from their lands and isolate Palestinian population
centers from the rest of the West Bank. The building of the Apartheid Wall
will annex up to 10% of the West Bank, and futher suffocate the Palestinian
people.

Tarek has been imprisoned since his arrest, with little to no media coverage
in Canada. Tarek -- an activist with the ISM and a Canadian citizen -- has
now been imprisoned for 12 days, as he continues to challenge the
deportation order against him.

I am writing to encourage you to get acquainted with the facts surrounding
Tarek's case and to act.

Please contact your local media outlets and encourage them to cover Tarek's
case. An articulate and outspoken Canadian Palestinian solidarity activist
has been in an Israeli jail for almost two weeks for no more than acting in
solidarity with non-violent Palestinian resistance efforts against the
illegal Israeli occupation. Tarek's story must be told in Canada.

Moreover, do inquire about Tarek's case with both Israeli officials and the
Canadian Embassy. They need to hear from many of us about Tarak's case.

I have included below a recent press release prepared by Tarek's support
team. More information about the ISM and Tarek's case is available at
http://www.palsolidarity.org. I have also included detailed contact info,
to help with any media inquires.

Tarek's support contacts in Canada include:
The Loubani Family: 519-434-3074 or 519-520-483
or ***@uwo.ca

Justin Podur: 416-978-6960 (day),
905-276-9284 (evenings) or
***@utoronto.ca
Paul Burrows: 204-944-9987 (day),
204-489-315 (evenings) or
***@ismcanada.org

In Palestine, you can contact the following numbers:
Huwaida: [phone]
ISM Media Office: [phone]

One of Tarek's Israeli lawyers is Shamai Leibowitz,
who can be reached as follows:
Shamai Leibowitz: [phone]

You can also pressure the following Israeli officials: Mr. Abraham Poraz,
Minister of Interior
Tel: [phone]
Facsimile: 972-2-5666376

Attorney General Elyakim Rubinstein
Tel: [phone]
Fax [phone]

Minister Mr. Avraham Poraz:
***@moin.gov.il

Director Mr. Mordechay Mordechay:
***@moin.gov.il

Spokeswoman Ms. Tova Ellinson:
***@moin.gov.il

Public Relations Ms. Nechama Pluga-Zecharia:
***@moin.gov.il

Finally, to contact the Canadian Embassy in Israel:
Tel - [phone]
Fax - [phone]
E-mail- ***@dfait-maeci.gc.ca


Again, please do make local media aware of Tarek's case, pressure the
Israeli govenment, and contact the Canadian Embassy to inquire about Tarek's
situation. Your actions can help.

In the struggle for justice and humanity,
Jaggi Singh, member of ISM-Montreal, and previous ISM volunteer to Palestine

The International Solidarity Movement (ISM) is made
up of international peace activists committed to finding
a peaceful resolution to the current Israeli-Palestinian
conflict by advocating for the right of self-determination
for Palestinians in the Occupied Territories (West Bank
and Gaza). The group is non-denominational, and is based
on the universal humanistic values of equality, universal
human rights, and self-determination.

July 21, 2003

International Solidarity Movement (ISM) Canada Press
Release for immediate release

Ten International Solidarity Movement (ISM) Peace activists, among them
two Canadians, still held in Israeli custody after being detained in the
West Bank.

Tarek Loubani, was arrested with three other ISM activists by the Israeli
army on July 9, 2003 in the Palestinian town of, near Jenin, after
establishing a peace camp to protest the construction of an Israeli security
wall on Palestinian territory. The Israeli wall known popularly as the
"Apartheid Wall", will effectively cut off Palestinian farmers from their
lands and isolate Palestinian population centers from the rest of the West
Bank.

At present the Israeli Army has not consulted residents of the West Bank on
the path the Security Wall, built on their land, would take, nor has the
Israeli Army compensated those whose lands have been confiscated for its
construction.

Commenting on their sons arrest, Tarek Loubanis parents issued a joint
statement saying:

"We consider our sons arrest and detention to be illegal and against
international norms. Tarek was arrested in Palestinian land under the
control of the Palestinian authority in which the Israeli Army has no legal
jurisdiction, while manning a Peace camp. We deplore the treatment of our
son to date at the hands of Israeli authorities and the unnecessary and
illegal deportation order that has been issued against him. Tarek is a Peace
activist who was peacefully expressing his opposition to the construction of
Israels controversial security wall, which threatens to destroy the
livelihoods of thousands and add further misery to an already miserable
situation."

Tareks parents went on to say, we are very concerned about our sons safety
in Israeli prison. We would like to have him home as soon as possible, but
we reject the Israeli governments deportation order issued against him and
his fellow activists. Israels deportation of a peace activist for what
Israeli prosecutors are referring to as unspecified security reasons is
simply unacceptable. As such, we ask that our son be released by Israeli
authorities immediately and his deportation order be over turned.

On 16 March, 2003, ISM peace activist Rachel Corrie was
crushed to death in Rafah by an Israeli Army bulldozer while
attempting to prevent the demolition of the family home of a
Palestinian physician. The Israeli Army conducted its own
investigation of Rachels death and ultimately exonerated itself
without interviewing, or taking into account, the eyewitness
testimony of several ISM activists who still maintain that the
bulldozer driver saw Rachel in her fluorescent orange ISM
jacket and continued to drive towards her, crushing her when
she tried to get out of the way at the final moment.
On 5 April, 2003, ISM peace activist Brian Avery was shot
in the face by a gun mounted on an Israeli armored personel
carrier (APC) as he was standing in the street with Tobias
Karlsson (on of the four Arrabony detainees) in Jenin. The
APC continued along its way after the shooting without
stopping while Brian lay on the ground bleeding. He suffered
serious wounds to his face, but is expected to recover.
On 11 April, 2003, ISM peace activist Tom Hurndall was
shot in the back of the head while ushering children to
safety in Rafah. Tom was shot from an Israeli Army guard
tower at Israels border with Egypt. Tom is currently in
England, with his family, although he is in a coma and has
suffered severe neurological damage and may never r
ecover. Like Rachel, Tom was wearing the ubiquitous ISM
fluorescent orange jacket when he was shot.
Unfortunately, Israeli officials have reacted to these tragic
events by arguing that ISM peace activists should not have
been in the West Bank and Gaza in the first place. The ISM,
however, remains committed to its mission.

"It's the action, not the fruit of the action, that's important. You have
to do the right thing. It may not be in your power, may not be in your
time, that there'll be any fruit.
But that doesn't mean you stop doing the right thing. You may never know
what results come from your action. But if you do nothing, there will be
no result."
-- Gandhi


"In the beginning of a change, The Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and
scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it
costs nothing to be a patriot."
-- Mark Twain

[Everyman]

Want to get rid of rigged-game debt-slavery, perpetual war and rule by
organized crime?

First you have to believe it is possible. Then you have to look at the best
proposals for doing it that have been made so far.

-----------------------

Jul 24 HE SHOWED US HOW TO WIN THIS COUNTRY BACK FOR THE PEOPLE WHO BUILT
IT: HUEY LONG'S POPULIST SENATE SPEECHES
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dick_eastman_populism/message/33


Jul 24 Another Pattern to Follow: Radio Priest Charles Coughlin founds THE
NATIONAL UNION FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE, Nov. 11, 1934
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dick_eastman_populism/message/34


Jul 17 1) DE's recommended reforms and 2) the Spanish American War 1898
set the pattern for all that followed
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dick_eastman_populism/message/32

[Everyman]

slowly every other discussion is hushed as one by one we learn that Bush and
his zionist mafia did 9-11
============================

THESE PAGES LET THE PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE SPEAK FOR ITSELF:

Evidence Photos Series 1: Interior wall still standing to right of fuselage
entry hole -- proving no starboard wing engine.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pentagon911/message/1


Evidence Photos Series 2: Released Security Cam Pictures -- the first two
reveal the jet-fighter-size and proportions of the aircraft, the missile
trail plume and the missile warhead explosion
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pentagon911/message/2


Evidence Photos Series 3: How we know that the most famous piece of
Boeing debris did not come from Flight 77 and was definitely planted on the
lawn north of the crash in order to deceive
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pentagon911/message/3

What you allege is a "Missile Plume" near/below the "Tail Fin" is
condensation

Nope. Sorry, Ralph.

Way too thick and creamy for condensation. It's missile smoke trail.

See for yourself:

Condensation off the wing of an American Airlines Boeing 757-200 looks like
this:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pentagon911/message/4


Now what else have you got?

There was no evidence of a small plane found in the debries. There was
substantual evidence of a certain Boeing 757

All the confetti and tiny shards are proof that a missile exploded against
that wall. The small plane then entered the building through the softened
outer wall.

Here is the proof of that:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pentagon911/message/2

Evidence Photos Series 2: Released Security Cam Pictures -- the first two
reveal the jet-fighter-size and proportions of the aircraft, the missile
trail plume and the missile warhead explosion )

http://www.internetopera.netfirms.com for documentation supporting my
statement regarding a certain Boeing 757, commonly refered to as Flt 77,
being found in the debries inside the bldg.

WHAT CHUTZPAH!!! WHAT BLUFF!!! The URL you site is nothing but "A Comic
Opera in Two Acts and Three Scenes by T. J. Fatchen (Flying Tadpole)" --
you bullshit artist! THERE IS NO NEW PHOTOS OR WITNESS TESTIMONY OR ANYTHING
RELATED TO WHAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT!!!

You conveniently ignore the second engine found at/near the incident site

&

a logical explanation of how it got to where it was found (See my
explatanation above).

I've talked to the Pentagon security people --THERE WAS NOT ENGINE OUTSIDE
THE PENTAGON -- AN ENGINE WAS BROUGHT TO THE PARKING LOT LATER FOR THE
CADAVER DOGS TO SNIFF OUT -- AND THAT WAS THE BASIS OF THAT RUMOR!!! YOU
ARE BLOWING SMOKE AGAIN, RALPH. BUT IN YOUR EVASION, YOUR CURRENT LIE, YOU
HAVE ADMITTED THAT NO STARBOARD WING ENGINE ENTERED THE PENTAGON.

LET ME REINFORCE THIS DEFINITE PROGRESS WITH A PRESENTATION OF THE HARD
EVIDENCE:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pentagon911/message/1

{ Interior wall still standing to right of fuselage entry hole -- proving no
starboard wing engine.]

In addition you also ignore the fact the 2 engines
found. 1 in the debries inside the bldg, the other/2nd engine in the "Mall
Area" were identified by "Serial Number" as having come from/haveing been

on

the Boeing 757 .....

No engine landed in the mall area. Only one engine has been reported inside
the building -- the one that broke through the C-ring wall. (Nor could any
engine have physically flown or bounced to any parking lot from a crash
such as the coverup story claims happened -- except an engine dropped by
the C-130 that flew over 30 seconds after the crash... but there was no
second engine. One security officer at the Pentagon says that people who
talk of an engine landing in the parking lot "are full of shit." No
kidding, those where his own words, I wouldn't lie to you. No serial number
was taken from any engine. Whoever made the claim is making up a story --
and I'd like to know who it is -- give us the URL. AND "HE MALL"IS WAY
THE HECK ON THE OTHER SIDE OF INTERSTATE 395 -- THE ENGINE WAS BROUGHT TO
THE NORTH PARKING LOT AFTER THE CRASH.

You are just a shyster liar -- a swindler -- just the type of scum who would
defend the mass-murder of over 2000 Americans in order to get a profitiable
war going that will wreck this whole country and get a lot of people killed.
Ralph Nesbitt -- you have a lot to answer for -- I pity your family for the
curse you are bringing to it. People remember traitors much more than good
guys.

Your attempt above to spin/use The ASCE Report, by reinteratering
events in a manner, with a High Probablity of Being Less Than Truthful to
support your scenario regarding the Flight 77 incident is the most
"Preposterous Line of B/S you have yet attempted IMHO.

I want to go back to the question of debris, Ralph. There are only a
handful of pieces that bespeak a Boeing 757 -- and they are all portable
and all showed up days after the event (when FEMA photographed the scene of
the crime just before they tore it all down) BUT THERE IS THAT FAMOUS PIECE
OF DEBRIS THAT MADE THE COVER OF TIME! And the fact is that that piece
proves that evidence was fraudulently planted -- and now being caught, it is
proof of a coverup.

Look here:

Evidence Photos Series 3: How we know that the most famous piece of
Boeing debris did not come from Flight 77 and was definitely planted to
deceive
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pentagon911/message/3


===========

American Society of Civil Engineers Pentagon Building Performance Report
backs up small-plane finding --- DISPROVES BOEING CRASH

The American Society of Civil Engineers in their Pentagon Building
Performance Report which reports the different levels of damage done to the
pillars in the first story of the crash region presents information that
supports the photo evidence showing that NO STARBOARD WING ENGINE OF A
BOEING 575 ENTERED THE PENTAGON.

As you read the report and examin the diagrams and simulations keep this
color code of levels of damage to columns in mind (note: "Spalling" means
that chips have been knocked off the pillar.)

Pink squares: In collapsed area. Presumed to have significant inpairment

Red squares: Missing, broken, disconnected, or otherwise without remaining
function

Blue squares: Impacted with large deformation and significant impairment of
function

Green squares: Heavy cracking and spalling with some impairment of function

Yellow squares: Cracking and spalling with no significant impairment of
function.

https://www.asce.org/pdf/illustrations.pdf

(Be sure to use the zoom feature of your Adobe Acrobat etc. to read the
legends of these diagrams)

Let us examin this graphical summary of the engineers' findings.

Illustration A -- A cut-away simulation showing the arrangement of pillars
, numbered 1 through 34 across the outer wall and rows AA (outer wall), A,
B, C ... through O (15 rows) on the first floor as you go back 220 ft. to
the wall of the C-ring exit hole which is between pillars 5-0 and 7-0
(there being only odd number pillars behind the first row on the outer wall,
i.e., twice as many)

The nose of the killer jet hit pillar 14-AA on the outer wall. The
distance from pillar 14-AA in the outer wall (E-ring) to exit hole between
columns 5-O and 7-0 in the C-ring wall is 310 feet.

But what do the engineers tell us about the damage to the Pentagon?

All the investigators did was enter the crash site for one day of
observations AFTER THE BUILDING HAD COLLAPSED OVER THE ORIGINAL CRASH HOLE,
examining each of the pillars and checking off its condition according to
this checklist:

Pink squares: In collapsed area. Presumed to have significant inpairment

Red squares: Missing, broken, disconnected, or otherwise without remaining
function

Green squares: Heavy cracking and spalling with some impairment of function

Yellow squares: Cracking and spalling with no significant impairment of
function.

The fact is that whereas the small-plane explaination is supported by photos
of the outer wall crash hole, pre-collapse, as having interior wall still
standing to the right of the hole where the fuselage entered, the ASCE
Pentagon Building Performance report DOES IN FACT SUPPORT THE SMALL-PLANE
PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE BY INDICATING THAT THE PILLARS TO THE RIGHT OF THE
NOSE-ENTRY WERE STILL STANDING. They are shown leaning out, indicating
that they were not knocked down -- (they are drawn in the diagram as
leaning, indicating that they were "disconnected or broken" but not missing
or knocked down (missing pillars are marked by a red spot, knocked down
pillars are shown lying on their sides in the diagram).


And as for the damage alone the 310 feet from AA 14 to the missing columns
(red spots) are extremely close to the center line of the path. MOST
NOTABLE IS THE FACT THAT DOUBLE COLUMN 11-D WHICH IS AN INTERIOR COLUMN
HOLDING UP THE INTERIOR BACK WALL OF E-RING JUST TO THE RIGHT OF WHERE THE
FUSELAGE PASSED (ACCORDING TO THE ENGINEER'S DOTTED LINE FROM AA-14 TO THE
HOLE IN C-RING) That column is not knocked down or missing, but only is
deformed with significant impairment of function. And on the starboard
side of the fuselage no more pillars are knocked down, whereas in the path
of the fuselage and to the port side from center there are seven more
red-marked pillars that are damaged (missing, broken, disconnected). (See
Illustration B)


But this is totally consistent with the fact that the engine popped out
between pillars 5-O and 7-O -- it is totally consistent with the fact that
the killer jet was a single-engine, engine-in-fuselage aircraft.

So we see that on the starboard side -- where we have -p[hotos of the
interior walls still standing before the collapse -- indicating that there
was no starboard wing engine -- we now also can point to the structural
report of the American Society of Civil Engineers, who show that the
exterior pillars were not downed to the right of the hole made by the
fuselage -- and that the engineers could make no determination of which of
the second and third rows of pillars (rows A and B after the exterior row
AA) were damaged or not, because of the subsequent collapse that destroyed
this evidence. BUT THE EVIDENCE THE ENGINEERS WERE ABLE TO PRESENT IS
ENTIRELY SUPPORTIVE OF THE SMALL PLANE THESIS, AND INCONSISTENT WITH THE
OFFICIAL STORY THAT AN AIRLINER WITH A MASSIVE STARBOARD WING ENGINE ENDERED
THE BUILDING -- IT WAS DEFINITELY A SINGLE ENGINE PLANE AS ALL THE OTHER
HARD EVIDENCE IS ALSO INDICATING.




Dick


----- Original Message -----
From: <jean-***@wanadoo.fr>
To: "Dick Eastman" <***@nwinfo.net>
Cc: <***@lineone.net>; <***@softhome.net>; <***@yahoo.com>;
<***@wanadoo.fr>; <***@nettrade.com.au>
Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2003 3:12 AM
Subject: Re: Graphics please

Hi Dick
Are you sure that Sgt Lagasse is able to make the difference beetween
"port" and "starboard". As I teach sailing, I can tell you lot of people
get confused with that... And Lagasse doesn't work in the navy :)
Other question : Lagasse says he was fueling his car near "barraks K".
Would it be somewhere else than Citgo gas station N 9.5 E 17.5 ? For
example N 4.1 E 9.4
Remind : grid is at Loading Image...
For the path of the plane shown by David, I agree. I'm waiting for Dick
indications to plot the paths of the "two" jets (Boeing / small single
engine killer jet) which according to him were there. BTW Dick, you know
there was also a C 130 : this makes three planes...
I got recently 300 Mbytes of pictures from the pentagon. I'm working on
some details of the crash zone and building damage. I can tell you I am

99%

certain the plane which has hit the pentagon was a twin engine airliner
- Was it a 757-200 (25%) or a 737-200 (75%) ?
- The bomb was it just a hollow charge (33%) or a Broach technology bomb
(67%) ?
- The plane was it remotely piloted (50%) or was it piloted by Hani

Hanjour

(50%) ?
- The plane was it empty of passengers (20%) or filled with 60 people

(80%) ?

It's sometimes frightening working on that. Organizing such a stuff is not
the fact of the small mafioso of your city...
I want to tell you, gals and guys, that I am well in my head, have no
intention to commit suicid, drive my car more carefully than I used to do
(the cops are under hard pressure for this here...), watch out when I

cross

a street, that I am in a perfect health...
Let me stop being paranoid !
Regards
JP

Than you for that very good shot, David.
You path of the killer jet is very close to Jean-Pierre's.
And you will notice that this path takes the killer jet south of Lagasse
(Lagasee saw the starboard side of the Boeing as it passed the gas
station, not the port. and it is too far south of Riskus as it crosses
Washington Blvd -- Riskus who states that it was only 100 feet from him
and that it appeared to go straight into the Pentagon, i.e, appeared to
hit perpendicular to the wall.
I wish you had incuded some comments with your picture.
Dick

[Everyman]

1. 20 Lies About the War

2. Leo Tolstoy, Address to the Swedish Peace Congress in 1909

=============================


http://www.khilafah.com/home/category.php?DocumentID=7809&TagID=2

20 Lies About the War

Falsehoods ranging from exaggeration to plain untruth were used to make the
case for war. More lies are being used in the aftermath. By Glen Rangwala
and Raymond Whitaker 13 July 2003


1 Iraq was responsible for the 11 September attacks

A supposed meeting in Prague between Mohammed Atta, leader of the 11
September hijackers, and an Iraqi intelligence official was the main basis
for this claim, but Czech intelligence later conceded that the Iraqi's
contact could not have been Atta. This did not stop the constant stream of
assertions that Iraq was involved in 9/11, which was so successful that at
one stage opinion polls showed that two-thirds of Americans believed the
hand of Saddam Hussein was behind the attacks. Almost as many believed Iraqi
hijackers were aboard the crashed airliners; in fact there were none.

2 Iraq and al-Qa'ida were working together

Persistent claims by US and British leaders that Saddam and Osama bin Laden
were in league with each other were contradicted by a leaked British Defence
Intelligence Staff report, which said there were no current links between
them. Mr Bin Laden's "aims are in ideological conflict with present-day
Iraq", it added.

Another strand to the claims was that al-Qa'ida members were being sheltered
in Iraq, and had set up a poisons training camp. When US troops reached the
camp, they found no chemical or biological traces.

3 Iraq was seeking uranium from Africa for a "reconstituted" nuclear weapons
programme

The head of the CIA has now admitted that documents purporting to show that
Iraq tried to import uranium from Niger in west Africa were forged, and that
the claim should never have been in President Bush's State of the Union
address. Britain sticks by the claim, insisting it has "separate
intelligence". The Foreign Office conceded last week that this information
is now "under review".

4 Iraq was trying to import aluminium tubes to develop nuclear weapons

The US persistently alleged that Baghdad tried to buy high-strength aluminum
tubes whose only use could be in gas centrifuges, needed to enrich uranium
for nuclear weapons. Equally persistently, the International Atomic Energy
Agency said the tubes were being used for artillery rockets. The head of the
IAEA, Mohamed El Baradei, told the UN Security Council in January that the
tubes were not even suitable for centrifuges.

5 Iraq still had vast stocks of chemical and biological weapons from the
first Gulf War

Iraq possessed enough dangerous substances to kill the whole world, it was
alleged more than once. It had pilotless aircraft which could be smuggled
into the US and used to spray chemical and biological toxins. Experts
pointed out that apart from mustard gas, Iraq never had the technology to
produce materials with a shelf-life of 12 years, the time between the two
wars. All such agents would have deteriorated to the point of uselessness
years ago.

6 Iraq retained up to 20 missiles which could carry chemical or biological
warheads, with a range which would threaten British forces in Cyprus

Apart from the fact that there has been no sign of these missiles since the
invasion, Britain downplayed the risk of there being any such weapons in
Iraq once the fighting began. It was also revealed that chemical protection
equipment was removed from British bases in Cyprus last year, indicating
that the Government did not take its own claims seriously.

7 Saddam Hussein had the wherewithal to develop smallpox

This allegation was made by the Secretary of State, Colin Powell, in his
address to the UN Security Council in February. The following month the UN
said there was nothing to support it.

8 US and British claims were supported by the inspectors

According to Jack Straw, chief UN weapons inspector Hans Blix "pointed out"
that Iraq had 10,000 litres of anthrax. Tony Blair said Iraq's chemical,
biological and "indeed the nuclear weapons programme" had been well
documented by the UN. Mr Blix's reply? "This is not the same as saying there
are weapons of mass destruction," he said last September. "If I had solid
evidence that Iraq retained weapons of mass destruction or were constructing
such weapons, I would take it to the Security Council." In May this year he
added: "I am obviously very interested in the question of whether or not
there were weapons of mass destruction, and I am beginning to suspect there
possibly were not."

9 Previous weapons inspections had failed

Tony Blair told this newspaper in March that the UN had "triedunsuccessfully
for 12 years to get Saddam to disarm peacefully". But in 1999 a Security
Council panel concluded: "Although important elements still have to be
resolved, the bulk of Iraq's proscribed weapons programmes has been
eliminated." Mr Blair also claimed UN inspectors "found no trace at all of
Saddam's offensive biological weapons programme" until his son-in-law
defected. In fact the UN got the regime to admit to its biological weapons
programme more than a month before the defection.

10 Iraq was obstructing the inspectors

Britain's February "dodgy dossier" claimed inspectors' escorts were "trained
to start long arguments" with other Iraqi officials while evidence was being
hidden, and inspectors' journeys were monitored and notified ahead to remove
surprise. Dr Blix said in February that the UN had conducted more than 400
inspections, all without notice, covering more than 300 sites. "We note that
access to sites has so far been without problems," he said. : "In no case
have we seen convincing evidence that the Iraqi side knew that the
inspectors were coming."

11 Iraq could deploy its weapons of mass destruction in 45 minutes

This now-notorious claim was based on a single source, said to be a serving
Iraqi military officer. This individual has not been produced since the war,
but in any case Tony Blair contradicted the claim in April. He said Iraq had
begun to conceal its weapons in May 2002, which meant that they could not
have been used within 45 minutes.

12 The "dodgy dossier"

Mr Blair told the Commons in February, when the dossier was issued: "We
issued further intelligence over the weekend about the infrastructure of
concealment. It is obviously difficult when we publish intelligence
reports." It soon emerged that most of it was cribbed without attribution
from three articles on the internet. Last month Alastair Campbell took
responsibility for the plagiarism committed by his staff, but stood by the
dossier's accuracy, even though it confused two Iraqi intelligence
organisations, and said one moved to new headquarters in 1990, two years
before it was created.

13 War would be easy

Public fears of war in the US and Britain were assuaged by assurances that
oppressed Iraqis would welcome the invading forces; that "demolishing Saddam
Hussein's military power and liberating Iraq would be a cakewalk", in the
words of Kenneth Adelman, a senior Pentagon official in two previous
Republican administrations. Resistance was patchy, but stiffer than
expected, mainly from irregular forces fighting in civilian clothes. "This
wasn't the enemy we war-gamed against," one general complained.

14 Umm Qasr

The fall of Iraq's southernmost city and only port was announced several
times before Anglo-American forces gained full control - by Defence
Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, among others, and by Admiral Michael Boyce, chief
of Britain's defence staff. "Umm Qasr has been overwhelmed by the US Marines
and is now in coalition hands," the Admiral announced, somewhat prematurely.

15 Basra rebellion

Claims that the Shia Muslim population of Basra, Iraq's second city, had
risen against their oppressors were repeated for days, long after it became
clear to those there that this was little more than wishful thinking. The
defeat of a supposed breakout by Iraqi armour was also announced by military
spokesman in no position to know the truth.

16 The "rescue" of Private Jessica Lynch

Private Jessica Lynch's "rescue" from a hospital in Nasiriya by American
special forces was presented as the major "feel-good" story of the war. She
was said to have fired back at Iraqi troops until her ammunition ran out,
and was taken to hospital suffering bullet and stab wounds. It has since
emerged that all her injuries were sustained in a vehicle crash, which left
her incapable of firing any shot. Local medical staff had tried to return
her to the Americans after Iraqi forces pulled out of the hospital, but the
doctors had to turn back when US troops opened fire on them. The special
forces encountered no resistance, but made sure the whole episode was
filmed.

17 Troops would face chemical and biological weapons

As US forces approached Baghdad, there was a rash of reports that they would
cross a "red line", within which Republican Guard units were authorised to
use chemical weapons. But Lieutenant General James Conway, the leading US
marine general in Iraq, conceded afterwards that intelligence reports that
chemical weapons had been deployed around Baghdad before the war were wrong.

"It was a surprise to me ... that we have not uncovered weapons ... in some
of the forward dispersal sites," he said. "We've been to virtually every
ammunition supply point between the Kuwaiti border and Baghdad, but they're
simply not there. We were simply wrong. Whether or not we're wrong at the
national level, I think still very much remains to be seen."

18 Interrogation of scientists would yield the location of WMD

"I have got absolutely no doubt that those weapons are there ... once we
have the co-operation of the scientists and the experts, I have got no doubt
that we will find them," Tony Blair said in April. Numerous similar
assurances were issued by other leading figures, who said interrogations
would provide the WMD discoveries that searches had failed to supply. But
almost all Iraq's leading scientists are in custody, and claims that
lingering fears of Saddam Hussein are stilling their tongues are beginning
to wear thin.

19 Iraq's oil money would go to Iraqis

Tony Blair complained in Parliament that "people falsely claim that we want
to seize" Iraq's oil revenues, adding that they should be put in a trust
fund for the Iraqi people administered through the UN. Britain should seek a
Security Council resolution that would affirm "the use of all oil revenues
for the benefit of the Iraqi people".

Instead Britain co-sponsored a Security Council resolution that gave the US
and UK control over Iraq's oil revenues. There is no UN-administered trust
fund.

Far from "all oil revenues" being used for the Iraqi people, the resolution
continues to make deductions from Iraq's oil earnings to pay in compensation
for the invasion of Kuwait in 1990.

20 WMD were found

After repeated false sightings, both Tony Blair and George Bush proclaimed
on 30 May that two trailers found in Iraq were mobile biological
laboratories. "We have already found two trailers, both of which we believe
were used for the production of biological weapons," said Mr Blair. Mr Bush
went further: "Those who say we haven't found the banned manufacturing
devices or banned weapons - they're wrong. We found them." It is now almost
certain that the vehicles were for the production of hydrogen for weather
balloons, just as the Iraqis claimed - and that they were exported by
Britain.

Source: Independent

=================================

Leo Tolstoy, Address to the Swedish Peace Congress in 1909



Dear Brothers:

We have met here to fight against war. War, the thing for the sake of
which all the nations of the earth -- millions and millions of people --
place at the uncontrolled disposal of a few men or sometimes only one man,
not merely milliards of rubles, talers, francs, or yen (representing a very
large share of their labour), but also their very lives. And now we, a
score of private people gathered from the various ends of the earth,
possessed of no special privileges and above all having no power over
anyone, intend to fight -- and as we wish to fight we wish to conquer --
this immense power not of one government but of all the governments, which
have at their disposal these milliards of money and millions of soldiers and
who are well aware that the exceptional position of these who form the
governments rests on the army alone: the army which has a meaning and
purpose only if there is a war, the very war against which we wish to fight
and which we wish to abolish.

For us to struggle, the forces being so unequal, must appear insane. But
if we consider our opponents' means of strife and our own, it is not our
intention to fight that will seem absurd bue that the thing we mean to fight
against can still exist. They have millions of money and millions of
obedient soldiers; we have only one thing, but that is the most powerful
thing in the world -- Truth.

Therefore, insignificant as our forces may appear in comparison with
those of our opponents, our victory is as sure as the victory of the light
of the rising sun over the darkness of night.

Our victory is certain, but on one condition only -- that when uttering
the truth we utter it all, without compromise, concession, or modification.
The truth is so simple, so clear, so evident, and so incumbent not only on
Christians but on all reasonable men, that it is only necessary to speak it
out completely in its full significance for it to be irresistible.

The truth n its full meaning lies in what was said thousands of years ago
(in the law accepted among us as the Law of God) in four words: Thou Shalt
Not Kill. The truth is that man may not and should not in any circumstances
or under any pretext kill his fellow men.

That truth is so evident, so binding and so generally acknowledged, that
it is only necessary to put it clearly before men for the evil called ware
to become impossible.

And so I think that if we who are assembled here at this Peace Congress,
should instead of clearly and definitely voicing this truth, address
ourselves to the governments with various proposals for lessening the evils
of war or gradually disminishing its frequency, we should be like men who
having in their hand the key to a door, should try to break through walls
they know to be too strong for them. Before us are millions of armed men,
ever more and more efficiently armed and trained for more and more rapid
slaughter. We know that these millions of people have no wish to kill their
fellows and for the most part do not even know why they are forced to do
that repulsive work, and that they are weary of their position of subjection
and compulsion; we know that the murders committed from time to time by
these men are committed by order of the governments; and we know that the
existence of the governments depends on the armies. Can we, then, who
desire the abolition of war, find nothing more conducive to our aim than to
propose to the governments which exist only by the aid or armies and
consequently by war -- measures which would destroy war? Are we to propose
to the governments that they should destroy themselves?

The governments will listen willingly to any speeches of that kind,
knowing that such discussions will neither destroy war nor undermine their
own power, but will only conceal yet more effectually what must be concealed
if wars and armies and themselves in control of armies are to continue to
exist.

'But', I shall be told, 'this is anarchism; people never have lived
without governments and States, and therefore governments and States and
military forces defending them are necessary for the existence of the
nations.'

But leaving aside the question of whether the life of Christian and other
nations is possible without armies and wars to defend their governmetns and
States, or even supposing it ot be necessary for their welfare that they
should slavishly submit to institutions called governments (consisting of
people they do not personally know), and publish an appeal to all men, and
especially to the Christian nations, in which we clearly and definitely
express what everybody knows but hardly anyone says: namely that war is
not -- as most people now assume -- a good and laudible affair, but that
like all murder, it is a vile and criminal business not only for those who
voluntarily choose a military career but for those who submit to it from
avarice or fear of punishment.

With regard to those who volunatrily choose a military career, I woujld
propose to state clearly and definitely in that appeal that notwithstanding
all the pomp, glitter, and general approval with which it is surrounded, it
is a criminal and shameful activity; and that the higher the position a man
holds in the military profession the more criminal and shameful is his
occupation. In the same way with regard to men of the people who are drawn
into military service by bribes or by threats of punishments, I propose to
speak clearly and definitely of the gross mistake they make -- contrary to
their faith, morality, and common sense -- when they consent to enter the
army; contrary to their faith, because by entering the ranks of murderers
they infringe the Law of God which they acknowledge; contrary to morality,
because for pay or from fear of punishment they agree to do what in their
souls they know to be wrong; and contrary to common sense, because if they
enter the army and war breaks out they risk having to suffer consequences as
bad or worse than those they are threatened with if they refuse. Above all
they act contrary to common sense in that they join that caste of people
which deprives them of freedom and compels them to become soldiers.

With reference to both classes I propose in this appeal to express
clearly the thought that for men of true enlightenment, who are therefore
free from the superstition of military glory (and their number is growing
every day) the military profession and calling, notwithstanding all the
efforts to hide its real meaning, is as shameful a business as an
executioner's and even more so. For the executioner olnly holds himself in
readiness to kill those who have been adjudged harmful and criminal, while a
soldier promises to kill all whom he is told to kill, even though they be
those dearest to him or the best of men.

Humanity in general, and our Christian humanity in particular, has
reached a stage of such acute contradiction between its moral demands and
the existing social order, that a change has become inevitable, and a change
not in society's moral demand which are immutable, but in the soical order
which can be altered. The demand for a different social order, evoked by
that inner contradiction which is so clearly illustrated by our preparations
for murder, becomes more and more insistent every year and every day. The
tension which demans that alteration has reached such a degree that, just as
sometimes only a slight shock is required to change a liquid into a solid
body, so perhaps only a slight effort or even a single word may be needed to
change the cruel and irrational life of our time -- with its divisions,
armaments, and armies -- into a reasonable life in keeping with the
consciousness of contemporary humanity. Every such effort, every such word,
may be the shock which will instantly solidify the super-cooled liquid. Why
should not our gathering be that shock? In Andersen's fairy tale, when the
King went in triumphal procession through the streets of the town and all
the people were delighted with his beautiful new clothes, a word from a
child who said what everybody knew but had not said, changed everything. He
said: 'He has nothing on!" and the spell was broken and the King became
ashamed and all those who had been assuring themselves that they saw him
wearing beautiful new clothes perceived that he was naked! We must say the
same. We must say what everybody knows but does not venture to say. We
must say that by whatever name men may call murder -- murder always remains
murder and a criminal and shameful thing. And it is only necessary to say
that clearly, definitely, and loudly, as we can say it here, and men will
cease to see what they thought they saw and will see what is really before
their eyes. They will cease to see the service of their country, the
heroism of war, military glory, and patriotism, and will see what exists:
the naked, criminal business of murder! And if people see that, the same
thing will happen as in the fairy tale: those who do the criminal thing
will feel ashamed, and those who assure themselves that they do not see the
criminality of murder will perceive it and cease to be murderers.

But how will naitons defend themselves against their enemies, how will
they maintain internal order, and how wilcan nations live without an army?

What form the life of men will take if they repudiate murder, we do not
and cannot know; but one thing is certain: that it is more natural for men
to be guided by the reason and conscience with which they are endowed, than
to submit slavishly to people who arrange wholesale murders; and that
therefore the form of social order assumed by the lives of those who are
guided in their actions not by violence based on threats of murder but by
reason and conscience, will in any case be no worse than that under which
they now live.

That is all I want to say. I shall be very sorry if it offends or
grieves anyone or evokes any ill feeling. But for me, a man eighty years
old, expecting to die at any moment, it would be shameful and criminal not
to speak out the whole truth as I understand it -- the truth which, as I
firmly believe, is alone capable of relieving mankind from the incalculable
ills produced by war.

[Everyman]

Post by Everyman
slowly every other discussion is hushed as one by one we learn that Bush

and

Post by Everyman
his zionist mafia did 9-11
============================
Evidence Photos Series 1: Interior wall still standing to right of

fuselage

Post by Everyman
entry hole -- proving no starboard wing engine.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pentagon911/message/1
Evidence Photos Series 2: Released Security Cam Pictures -- the first two
reveal the jet-fighter-size and proportions of the aircraft, the missile
trail plume and the missile warhead explosion
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pentagon911/message/2
Evidence Photos Series 3: How we know that the most famous piece of
Boeing debris did not come from Flight 77 and was definitely planted on

the

Post by Everyman
lawn north of the crash in order to deceive
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pentagon911/message/3

I sm having a very difficult time getting posts with photos out today.

TO read the following with diagram and photographs go to this page
yahoogroup message:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pentagon911/message/5

Otherwise here is the text only:




----- Original Message -----
From: Dick Eastman
To: Quigs_Fight ; wolfowitz_9-***@yahoogroups.com ;
apfn-***@yahoogroups.com ; September Disaster ; the911coverup
Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 12:27 PM
Subject: [the911coverup] Did the killer jet engine break through innermost
wall of C-ring?




A faithful reader writes:


From: "tw45ph" <***@softhome.net> [Ron Harvey]
To: <***@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 2:08 AM
Subject: [frameup] Re: the engine popped out?

Post by Everyman
This error crops up to an unbelievably tedious extent.
There was no "second interior wall"!
The lower two floors formed a continuous interior, divided only by
pillars and interior partition walls, all the way through the outer
three rings.

Ron, I don't see that Smith has made any "tedious error," because what is
the first "interior partition wall" you come to after entering the building
if not if not a "second interior wall?" After the outer wall was
penetrated would not the first "interior partition wall" encountered by the
"second interior wall?"



All of my posts over the last several months have told this story: The
E,D, and C"rings" of the Pentagon are actually joined as one building at the
level of the first and second floors. The interior weight is supported by
the pillars, but there are interior walls that are fireproof and heavy
enough to deaden office sounds partitioning the lower-floor rooms. And it
is such walls that we see, in the photos taken from Washington Blvd. on
9-11-01, are still standing right near the exterior hole where outer wall
has fallen away (following the initial explosion) on the first floor and
exactly at the spot where a Boeing 757 starboard engine would have had to
have smashed through if a Boeing 757 had hit nose first at pillar AA14 at an
angle of 55-degrees.

On the right side of the hole made by the fuselage of the killer jet there
is no hole through those interior walls still standing and moreover the
three outer pillars immediately to the right of this hole are not even
completely knocked down ( according to the ASCE Civil Engineers who
examined the wreckage (although key evidence was already destroyed by the
post-crash collapse of the building over the entry hole and most of the
"tunnel" made by the killer jet as it pushed through the structure -- they
viewing the scene two days after the crash. Thus, the killer jet was
definitely not a Boeing 575.

The only explanation that accounts for the damage that has been discovered,
is that an F-16 crashed immediately after the lower wall had been softened
by a high-flash (which flash we see in picture #2 of the 3 frame-per-second
security cam corder sequence released by the DoD) air-to-ground penetration
missile warhead. The record of damaged pillars and still-standing interior
wall is inconsistent with a two-engine jet liner -- contrary to the counter
claims of persons on the internet who have been misrepreseting the contents
of that report.




This:








Not this:


Did this:



Look at the problem: [And the fact that the real killer jet actually hit
at a 55-degree angle, coming from the right in this picture, in no way
eliminates this problem with "official version" of the crash.]




NOW LOOK HERE:

Interior wall still standing to right of fuselage entry hole -- proving no
starboard wing engine hit the Pentagon:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pentagon911/message/1




And note this:

The air-to-ground missile fired ahead of the crashing F-16 brought down
the outer wall along a strethch of the first floor, which according to the
man in charge of the Pentagon rennovation, was a length wider than the 24.5
ft. wingspan of the crashing plane, but the second floor absorbed the shock
for the wall of the second floor, which at the wall rests on the second
floor.

And this: Some say Boeing wing engines did not go through the walls because
they were pulled into the center hole by the contracting wings -- one
witnesses, a pilot in fact , says he saw this happen. Nevertheless it is
impossible. Whatever the difficulties with the physics and chemistry of the
problem there is the fact tha the 757 engines protrude ahead of the wing.
They would go into a wall before the wing started to go in -- and when
hitting a wall at a 55-degree angle coming from the right the starboard
engine would have hit before even the root of the wing. Click for a
dramatic illustration.


And this:

American Society of Civil Engineers Pentagon Building Performance Report
backs up small-plane finding --- DISPROVES BOEING CRASH

[Note: If you have already read this finding regarding the true import of
the ASCE study, scroll down to the new and very incriminating finding
regarding the interior pillars that were to the right of the killer jet as
it headed for the exit-hole in the C-ring east wall.]


The American Society of Civil Engineers in their Pentagon Building
Performance Report which reports the different levels of damage done to the
pillars in the first story of the crash region presents information that
supports the photo evidence showing that NO STARBOARD WING ENGINE OF A
BOEING 575 ENTERED THE PENTAGON.

As you read the report and examin the diagrams and simulations keep this
color code of levels of damage to columns in mind (Note: "spalling" means
that chips have been knocked off the pillar.)

Pink squares: In collapsed area. Presumed to have significant inpairment

Red squares: Missing, broken, disconnected, or otherwise without remaining
function

Blue squares: Impacted with large deformation and significant impairment of
function

Green squares: Heavy cracking and spalling with some impairment of function

Yellow squares: Cracking and spalling with no significant impairment of
function.

https://www.asce.org/pdf/illustrations.pdf

(Be sure to use the zoom feature of your Adobe Acrobat etc. to read the
legends of these diagrams)

Let us examin this graphical summary of the engineers' findings.

Illustration A -- A cut-away simulation showing the arrangement of
pillars, numbered 1 through 34 across the outer wall and rows AA (outer
wall), A, B, C ... through O (15 rows) on the first floor as you go back
220 ft. to the wall of the C-ring exit hole which is between pillars 5-0
and 7-0 (there being only odd number pillars behind the first row on the
outer wall, i.e., twice as many)

The nose of the killer jet hit pillar 14-AA on the outer wall. The
distance from pillar 14-AA in the outer wall (E-ring) to exit hole between
columns 5-O and 7-0 in the C-ring wall is 310 feet.

But what do the engineers tell us about the damage to the Pentagon?

All the investigators did was enter the crash site for one day of
observations AFTER THE BUILDING HAD COLLAPSED OVER THE ORIGINAL CRASH HOLE,
examining each of the pillars and checking off its condition according to
this checklist:

Pink squares: In collapsed area. Presumed to have significant inpairment

Red squares: Missing, broken, disconnected, or otherwise without remaining
function

Green squares: Heavy cracking and spalling with some impairment of function

Yellow squares: Cracking and spalling with no significant impairment of
function.

The fact is that whereas the small-plane explaination is supported by photos
of the outer wall crash hole, pre-collapse, as having interior wall still
standing to the right of the hole where the fuselage entered, the ASCE
Pentagon Building Performance report DOES IN FACT SUPPORT THE SMALL PLANE
PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE BY INDICATING THAT THE PILLARS TO THE RIGHT OF THE
NOSE-ENTRY WERE STILL STANDING. They are shown leaning out, indicating
that they were not knocked down -- (they are drawn in the diagram as
leaning, indicating that they were "disconnected or broken" but not missing
or knocked down (missing pillars are marked by a red spot, knocked down
pillars are shown lying on their sides in the diagram).


And as for the damage alone the 310 feet from AA 14 to the missing columns
(red spots) are extremely close to the center line of the path. MOST
NOTABLE IS THE FACT THAT DOUBLE COLUMN 11-D WHICH IS AN INTERIOR COLUMN
HOLDING UP THE INTERIOR BACK WALL OF E-RING JUST TO THE RIGHT OF WHERE THE
FUSELAGE PASSED (ACCORDING TO THE ENGINEER'S DOTTED LINE FROM AA 14 TO THE
HOLE IN C-RING) That column is not knocked down or missing, but only is
deformed with significant impairment of function. And on the starboard
side of the fuselage no more pillars are knocked down, whereas in the path
of the fuselage and to the port side from center there are seven more
red-marked pillars that are damaged (missing, broken, disconnected). (See
Illustration B)


But this is totally consistent with the fact that the engine popped out
between pillars 5-O and 7-O -- it is totally consistent with the fact that
the killer jet was a single-engine, engine-in-fuselage aircraft.

A new and interesting point made by the engineer in charge of the Pengtagon
rennovation based on his own inspection of the damaged pillars. He noted
that there were pillars knocked down that were far to the port side of even
where the wing tip would have been had a Boeing 757 flown through the first
floor of the interconected E, D and C rings perfectly in tact! WHAT CAN WE
CONCLUDE BUT THAT THESE PILLARS WERE TAKEN DOWN AFTER THE CRASH TO
PRECIPITATE THE COLLAPSE OF THE BUILDING WHICH COLSED UP THE TOO-OBVIOUS
TOO-SMALL HOLE VISIBLE FROM OUTSIDE THE WEST WALL!

It may even be that the suspiciously perfect round hall in the C-ring was
made by the black-op DoD, the CIA or the FBI to get a hole through which
explosives could be fired or charges planted to cause the collapse that
brought down the building over the too-small hole visible from Washington
Blvd.

If this is the case, then we would still have the approximate 55-degree
angle established by the lamp posts and the entry hole on the outer west
wall.


So we see that on the starboard side -- where we have -p[hotos of the
interior walls still standing before the collapse -- indicating that there
was no starboard wing engine -- we now also can point to the structural
report of the American Society of Civil Engineers, who show that the
exterior pillars were not downed to the right of the hole made by the
fuselage -- and that the engineers could make no determination of which of
the second and third rows of pillars (rows A and B after the exterior row
AA) were damaged or not, because of the subsequent collapse that destroyed
this evidence. BUT THE EVIDENCE THE ENGINEERS WERE ABLE TO PRESENT IS
ENTIRELY SUPPORTIVE OF THE SMALL PLANE THESIS, AND INCONSISTENT WITH THE
OFFICIAL STORY THAT AN AIRLINER WITH A MASSIVE STARBOARD WING ENGINE ENDERED
THE BUILDING -- IT WAS DEFINITELY A SINGLE ENGINE PLANE AS ALL THE OTHER
HARD EVIDENCE IS ALSO INDICATING.





Thus THIS NEVER HAPPENED:

Rather: The Boeing 757 (Flight 77) overflew the Pentagon -- as I will
presently be illustrating for you here with new graphics being prepared by
another investigator.


9-11 Pentagon Attack Investigation Information:



Dick Eastman:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/9-11-demonstrative-evidence-of-frameup/message
s
(Note especially the most recent of the 34 messages here.)

The French, with Cartesian rationality, put out the best information on
September 11. But there are others: Gerard Holmgren, Tom Flocco, Joel
Skousen, Frank Levin, Ken Varden, Nico Haupt, Don Blue, Ron Winn, Neils
Groenveld, Ian Henshaw, Agent Fescado, Dave Bosankoe (retired) and all
whose valuable and reliable sites are listed below. (Note, I have never
made an exhaustive study to learn what good sites are out there -- these
are just those I have resorted to when seeking facts related to questions at
hand.)

Those totally useless and dishonest are Ron Harvey, Sarah Roberts (a.k.a
CCummings, StJarna, Spinner, isopodia etc.), Bertie the Bunyip, Agent 86,

Eric Bart:
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/ericbart/index.html

Jean-Pierre DesMoulins
http://earth-citizens.net
(this site is frequently being reorganized -- good info comes and goes so
check often)


Gerard Holmgren
http://hamilton.indymedia.org:8081/front.php3?article_id=1786&group=webcast
http://www.world-action.co.uk/conspiracy.html


Eastman- ***@yahoogroups.com
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pentagon911/message/1
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pentagon911/message/2
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pentagon911/message/3

Eastman-APFN:
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/77_deastman1.htm
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/77_deastman2.htm
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/77_deastman3.htm


Here are good investigators who are not protecting the Pentagon and military
(e.g., Rivero, Rense, Vialls (former MI6) , Ruppert -- each otherwise a very
good source of information) or protecting the Zionists running it (e.g.,
Jarred Israel, of human underground -- who blames everything on gentiles in
the corporate world (i.e., Cheney and Bush "let 9-11 happen") but not
Wolfowitz, Perle, Rumsfeld etc. whoa actually are responsbile for the
Pentagon crash -- as all the evidence presented by me and other truly
open-minded investigators shows ):

More objective no-axe-to-grind, no-buddies-to-protect 9-11 Investigators:

http://www.freedomfiles.org/war (Neils Groenveld et al.)
http://www.freedomfiles.org/war/pentagon.htm
http://www.911dossier.co.uk/ (Ian Henshaw et al.)

http://www.ifrance.fr/silentbutdeadly/
http://www.the-movement.com/Hijackers/Agents.htm (Frank Levin)
http://www.communitycurrency.org/pi.html

http://www.waronfreedom.mediamonitors.net/index.html
http://www.911timeline.net/
http://amigaphil.planetinternet.be/PentagonCrash.html

http://www.tomflocco.com/bush_may_invoke_9.htm
http://disc.server.com/Indices/149495.html
http://www.etherzone.com

http://www.antiwar.com
http://www.serendipity.li/wtc.html#preface
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/timeline/

http://digipressetmp4.teaser.fr/site/dossier.php?dosnum=60

========

Message 41 in thread
From: Brave New Worm (***@spam.spam)
Subject: Re: ASCE - No 757 at Pentagon was Re: Eastman's guide to exposing
the 9-11 mass-murder frameup to justify world-domination to an otherwise
isolationist American public


View this article only
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy.america-at-war, alt.conspiracy,
alt.disasters.aviation, alt.aviation, alt.gossip.celebrities,
us.military.army
Date: 2003-07-26 22:19:53 PST

Post by Everyman

The rubble has very little to do with anything, seeing as how there
was no possible entry point for a starboard engine.
Not to mention the conflicting cover stories...

You are wonderful to watch. I really respect the way you can dish it
out to them over and over, taking all their crap, and never getting
flustered or backing off, but always coming back with the point they
can't evade!!!
You are beautiful!

Mr. Eastman, I feel the same way about you. It's a very unpopular
position you have taken, but the truth is often unpopular. And believe it
or not, you have made a difference. There are a few bleating sheep adding
noise, but there are 100 times more readers who are noting what is going
on in this discussion. I salute you, sir. If only we had more Americans
with your courage.


Now let's savor the response of the morons and shills, shall we? ; )



Btw, turning the ASCE report around on them was a stunning move.

Post by Everyman
See Bertie and Grasso plotz. Look at their activity! They are
working around the clock. The Jewish Mafia and Masonic Murderers
have flonked their balls off and are getting nowhere -- it doesn't
work any more -- the old trick of exasperating and driving the decent
folk out of politics just doesn't cut it any more --once it shewed the
wasps away, now
you're getting the swarm and their righteous anger increases with
every flonk you flonk.
Ok, everybody, here is why BEFEHL IST BEFEHL is on firm ground when ...

[Everyman]

Articles: 1) Iraqis, "bringing it on", take five more of our sons, while
fighting their own version of "Red Dawn" against zionist globalization; 2)
....
========================


US warned it faces 'third Gulf War' in Iraq
http://tinyurl.com/i94f

US troops turn botched Saddam raid into a massacre
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/fisk/

F/A-18C fighter downed by missile that 'tracked' him
http://tinyurl.com/i95z

Five American soldiers dead in 24 hours
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/072803A.shtml
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/07/27/international/worldspecial/27IRAQ.html

George W Bush can Designate Anyone He Chooses an Enemy Combatant Outside the
Protection of Law
http://villagevoice.com/issues/0331/hentoff.php

Secret Sections of the 9/11 Report
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/07/26/national/26SAUD.html

Buchanan: Neocons have led us wrong
http://amconmag.com/07_28_03/buchanan.html

Official Story on Deaths of Saddam's Sons "Wags the Dog"
http://globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO307E.html

Military Wife Rebuked for E-Mail critical of war handling -- "certain people
are getting their soldiers in trouble" warns 400th Military Police Battalion
Family Readiness Group
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A51277-2003Jul26.html


Untold Story: Desertions -- U.S. soldiers in Iraq are escaping from Iraq
under the guise of Kurdish citizens, wearing Arab loose headdress
http://www.islamonline.net/English/News/2003-07/27/article07.shtml

BBC calls head of MI6 to its defence in Hutton inquiry into distorted Iraqi
weapons dossier.

Blair government determined to cover up its lies at any cost . even if that
means destroying the BBC in the process,
http://www.sundayherald.com/35503

The coalition air war commander, Lieutenant General T. Michael Moseley,
revealed this weekend that Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld had to
personally sign off on any airstrike ''thought likely to result in deaths of
more than 30 civilians,'' as The New York Times reported. ''More than 50
such strikes were proposed, and all of them were approved.''
http://tinyurl.com/holj


House has rubber stamped w/o discussion NAFTA-like globalization
arrangements with Singapore and Chile
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A42616-2003Jul24.html


Pentagon Plans Draft Of Doctors And Nurses -- up to an estimated 80,000
surgeons, nurses, dentists, X-ray technicians, etc. -- Socialized
medicine comes to the warfare state: Cheaper than paying market medical
rates -- shrewd Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld, Perle, Meyer find a way to patch up
soldiers without having to send any home where they might talk
http://www.charlotte.com/mld/observer/news/5444639.htm

'Bush Was Warned' About 9/11 -- White House, CIA Kept Key Portions of
Report Classified
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A43291-2003Jul24.html

Fomer CIA Chief: 'Intelligence Failure of Massive Proportions' in Iraq
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A42718-2003Jul24.html

Ignored by 9-11 Committee: Pentagon interior wall was still standing to
right of fuselage entry hole -- proving no starboard wing engine went
through, the killer jet was not a Boeing 757
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pentagon911/message/1



The FBI and CIA had accumulated masses of information both inside and
outside the United States that were either not put together for
half-bureaucratic, half-political reasons or ignored by those responsible,
who believed America invulnerable and so gave no credit to proof of threats
right before their eyes. The report shows that five of the nineteen
Al-Quaeda terrorists had met with fourteen people on American soil who were
already subjects of FBI inquiry. Four of them were subject to further
inquiry. An FBI informant had been in contact with two of the hijackers
while they were in San Diego, but the local bureau antenna didn't know that
the same people had been identified by the CIA as members of Bin Ladin's
network. Summer 2001, several alerts were given about imminent attacks
supposed to cause "considerable losses": they were not followed up on.
http://www.lemonde.fr/article/0,5987,3208--328869-,00.html

Pakistan: Thousands Being Recruited For 'Jihad'
http://www.gulf-news.com/Articles/news.asp?ArticleID=93677

White House Defense of Uranium Claim Produces Maze of Contradictions
http://ap.tbo.com/ap/breaking/MGAVRY54JID.html

9/11 Report missed this: That most famous piece of Boeing debris did not
come from Flight 77 and was definitely planted on the lawn north of the
crash in order to deceive
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pentagon911/3


9/11 Report: No Iraq Link to al-Qaida
http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20030723-064812-9491r

Commission was a coverup: Released Security Cam Pictures -- the first two
frames reveal the jet-fighter-size and proportions along with the missile
trail plume and the missile warhead explosion
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pentagon911/2


House Rolls Back "Sneak and Peek" Patriot Act Provisions
http://asia.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=politicsNews&storyID=3138081

Amnesty International: Iraqis Accuse U.S. Forces of Torture
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/072403D.shtml

Atrocities against the Afghan People
http://www.freedomfiles.org/war/atrocity.htm

U.S. struggling to find replacement troops
http://www.sanluisobispo.com/mld/sanluisobispo/news/politics/6335469.htm


'I did not want to be a collaborator'
http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1007045,00.html

When the overall military action itself is unjust -- based on the calculated
perversion of public trust by lies invoking an "imminent threat" that was
patently nonexistent, and on the constantly insinuated blood libel that Iraq
was somehow complicit in the Sept. 11 massacres; when, furthermore, the
military action is illegal -- an act of unilateral aggression unsanctioned
by international law, the UN Charter or the constitution of the United
States (which does not give Congress the authority to delegate its warmaking
powers to the personal whim of the president), then the innocent deaths that
result from such an action cannot be "justified" as the result of "normal"
wartime operations.
http://www.tmtmetropolis.ru/stories/2003/07/25/120.html


Organized Crime in the Administration did 9-11 (34 photo articles)
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/9-11-demonstrative-evidence-of-frameup/

Proof that the Defense Department attacked their own Headquarters on 9-11-01
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pentagon911/message/1
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pentagon911/message/2
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pentagon911/message/3

What convinced me 9-11 was a frameup
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/77_deastman1.htm
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/77_deastman2.htm
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/77_deastman3.htm

Leading investigators of the 9-11 mass-murder inside-job black op
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/ericbart/index.html
http://www.freedomfiles.org/war
http://www.freedomfiles.org/war/pentagon.htm
http://www.911dossier.co.uk/

More on the 9-11 frameup:
http://earth-citizens.net
http://www.ifrance.fr/silentbutdeadly/
http://www.the-movement.com/Hijackers/Agents.htm
http://www.communitycurrency.org/pi.html

[Everyman]

AT LAST THE TRUTH FOR THE SEPTEMBER 11 DEAD AND THE DEAD IN EACH OF THE WARS
SINCE


http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pentagon911/message/7



Here, at last, is the ultimate proof that will finally bring justice to the
September 11 dead, and to the families of all the dead in the wars that have
resulted in that mass-murder frameup and highest treason.

The use of three aircraft at once over Arlington and D.C. to distract from
the ground-level stealth attack of the killer jet tells it all.

These were the distraction planes:

1. The C-130 that followed the Boeing in overflying the crash

2. The four engine jet over the Capitol and White House

3. The Boeing 757 (Flight 77) itself, before it "disappeared into
the exposion," only to begin its landing at Reagan National
within a minute of overflying the crash.

Review the actions of each of these planes and there can be no doubt as to
their function as distractions in the mass-murder psy-op conducted by top
leaders in the White House, Pentagon, the FAA, the FBI and the CIA.

The work of 9-11 investigators is now finished. The guilty have been
identified and their guilt proven. Now comes the test of the American
people and of justice in this land. I am confident that justice will now be
served.

Dick Eastman
223 S. 64th Ave.
Yakima, Washington

Two paths leading to the Pentagon -- one taken by the killer jet that

fired

a missile ahead of its own crash, the other taken by AA Flight 77, the
Boeing 757, over the crash and over the Pentagon and over the 14th street
bridge as it turned to the runways of Reagan National Airport.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pentagon911/message/6

[Everyman]

You're apparently agreeing with Eastman's claim that large
numbers of US Gov. personel were involved in faking an
attack for some nefarious purpose.

"for some nefarious purpose" you say? -- you mean you don't know the
specifics of the long long list of motivations that have been provided --
motivations involving trillions (oil, laundered opium/heroin revenues,
looting and "globalization plundering" of sovereign Iraq, contracts for
corporations and interest earnings for war-debt merchants etc. -- trillions
of dollars of incentive and the greatest (perceived) gains to power and
"security" of the small insulated ruling coterie led by Perle, Wolfowitz,
Kissinger etc. behind Donald Rumsfeld and President George W. Bush?

====================

You asked "Yet, I have not seen any account from hotel witnesses (some
report seeing it pass by very close past their windows -- but windows on
which side of the building?" Is this hotel facing | or this way ---

towards

the Pentagon? Is it over on the right of the crash point? The windows are
on the long wall of the hotel, I assume.

You mean you haven't seen my most important recent post????
Yes, I sent out a "mailer" BUT I PUT THE WRONG URL
on the flyer!!! DANG! NO ONE HAS SEEN THIS!!!
( No wonder no one sent the telegrams and flowers I was
fully expecting!)

At any rate, please open the following page and be sure to click on the
small picture showing a Canadian airlines plane flying over Arlington
west of the Sheraton, Annex and Pentagon, found under the heading
"THE SHERATON AND THE ANNEX WERE USED TO LINE UP THE BOEING FOR
THE OVERFLY":

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/9-11-demonstrative-evidence-of-frameup/message
/38

By the way -- the sting of Harvey-Desmoulins has just backfired in their
faces.

With witness William Lagasse now known to have told the major media that
the plane was almost straight overhead and, in addition to that, with
confirmation from a military witness decorated for his presence of mind
during the disaster reporting to newsmen that the Boeing came over the
hotel -- the small-plane thesis is not only untouched by the Ron
Harvey-Jean-PierreDesmoulins mud fling , it is actually enhanced, completed
and rendered air-tight and damn-near perfect.

On the grid that that scrofulous grenouille de poison, Desmoulins has
provided -- "moulin de vent" (i.e., "windmill" ) we should call him -- we
now can confidently plot the true limits of the possible paths taken by the
Boeing 757, as it went 'straight' to the wall (note: I assume a linear
path over this short stretch of the approach), as it went straight to the
impact point on the Pentagon west wall.

Thus the plane when i t enters the area depicted on the gridded satellite
photo-map from one of any y-axis intercept point between y = 3.5 and y =
4.0.

And please note how this range of paths includes, as a lower limit, the
second of the paths that Desmoulin's put out based on the coordinates I gave
him the second time (working I was reckoning only from Lagasse at the gas
station and the south edge of the Sharaton.) [Note: The first time I had
plotted a path from a data point 100 feet south of Riskus (where he says
the Boeing crossed Washington Blvd (rt.27), a postion that resulted in
putting the Boeing path too far to north of the true path with respect to
the Annex (i.e. well over the interior of Arlington Cemetery, which is too
far north.)

But now we have it nailed down and the small-plane theory is fully
vindicated once more.

So any path bounded by a lower limits on the y-intercept of 3.5 on the grid
and and upper limit of 4.0. does the trick.

See here for grid to fit it yourself -- ( can anyone put in the right
coordinates for me and some labels? That is, someone we can trust. All
you need to do this is "photoshop" and the pictures given at this URL:

[WARNING: 1,958 KB total -- including attachments that you open when you
get there.]

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/9-11-demonstrative-evidence-of-frameup/message
/39

Because the lady says "Then it shot straight across from where
we are and flew right into the Pentagon. It was just this huge
fireball that crashed into the wall (of the Pentagon)"
If the Sheraton is facing flat on towards the Pentagon, like this

" | " then she didn't see it "pass" her window, as such. If

the view out the window takes in the Washington Monument then
she didn't see it pass her window. If the window faces west--- then
she saw it pass her window but could she see it hit the Pentagon.

I follow.

She was looking west and just looked up and saw fuselage and wings come over
her head on its way to the Penagon -- she was facing west. The sound was
probaly not too far ahead of the very fast plane so that she did not have
enough of an early auditory warning to look up earlier.

Very good point about the room windows facing either east or west on the
hotel. windows.

I feel you give me so much information that I never get around to putting
out -- and I know the reason.

Yesterday I was caught up all day with Harvey and Desmoulins -- they tied
me up with their scam (having spotted, with satellite photomap location
information that I did not then have -- that Lagasse's statement was
geometrically incompatible with a straight-line run from south of the
Sheraton to the crash -- and so they got me to throw out coordinates that
did not take this limitation of the possible paths into account -- and
then tried to spin that into refutation of the entire theisis and all of its
varied proofs built around a diversity of factors and known events.

I see that this morning I have a lot of Ron Harvey posts waiting for me on
frameup -- a relatively small list with a readership that always stays mum
(with the exception of newcomer Valentine Smith -- the mystery personage.)

The tragedy of having Harvey and Desmoulins attempting to distract me from
the orderly progress in the presentation of data is that I am getting
letters with a lot of important information (yours among them) that I fear
are not getting the exposure they need to do all the good they can do in the
service of truth and of motivating the public to appropriate action. I have
enough information and not-followed up on leads that would keep a staff of
five busy all day.

See here that the witness is not quoted as saying they saw AA 77 -
http://www.uua.org/world/2002/01/feature3a.html
( thats the just the usual writer's paraphrasing) - just the white smoke
and then the black.

....

I suggest that you familiarize yourself with the idea of FACTS in
evidence, discovery of evidence, and learn how a question must
follow the evidence which is factual rather than questions wihich
are irrelevant and immaterial, and incompetent questions are questions
which are not based on the evidence evidence under consideration.
Learn the distinction in the legal sense of the words incompetent
irrelvant and immaterial. learn about rhetorical questions, learn about
what hearsay is, learn about 'best evidence', learn how to impeach a
witness and never answer his irrelevant questions- determine whether
or not they are relevant- stick to the facts, the ones that matter.
Determine whether or not you are discussing facts or whether you are
discussing speculation or supposition- it's OK to discuss such things as
long as they are not mistaken for facts- keep this in perspsective and
keep the discussion of facts APART from the discussion of specualation.
Call him on his opinions- his opinions are not authoritative- if opinion
is to be considered, then the opinions of the authorities in that field
under consideration are the only relevant opinions.
Possibilities are one thing probabilities are another
Statistics are NOT FACTS- statistics are OPINIONS of authorities- keep
that in mind. they can be refuted easily enough.
... Keep that in mind staistical evidence is only and always an

approximation-

it can never be factual. ...

....

You should have known better than to let them play 'divide and conquer'.
now you have contributed to dividing --- I don't want those who oppose
the government's bogus story to be divided into camps- I only argue
against the govermnet apologists! ...

....

I have seen your writing and spelling deteriorate over many months.
This is a sign of fatigue. Too many people have taken you on and too
many times you have accepted the challenge. From what I have seen
of the posts you have forwarded, those who do not want your
theory to become widely known have adopted the tactic of wasting
your time and energy, time and energy which otherwise would have
been devoted to getting the word out more widely. They pick small
unresolved issues and throw them against you as if they were weighty
counter arguments so that you, never sure how your readers are
taking their posts, are forced to rebut them again and again.
It is a wonder you are still alive just on the basis of the way
you are handling this and you should recall that I warned you
personally many months ago that is was going to lead to big trouble
for you to pursue the 'bomb or missile or substitute plane hit
the pentagon theory'- they just swarm against you...

==============


Subject: Re: 9/11 Liars Abound was Re: Dick Eastman Goofs Again

You can't have it both ways. If the mass and velocity was
sufficient to drive one engine through several walls,
then the second one would have behaved in the same manner.

Not if it hit the ground first. [Now follow along as
"Agent 86" tries to make this ridiculus dodge work. --DE ]

But it didn't

Why?

[ Did you get that? AGENT 86 HAS NO COMEBACK -- HE JUST FILLS THE
VOID WITH THE PRETENSE THAT THE BALL IS NOT IN HIS COURT, i.e., asking why
the discussant thinks the engine did not hit the ground first -- when he
himself has introduced only the ungrounded statement "Not if it hit the
ground first." Now keep watching! --DE]

Or is the ground made of something I don't know
about. Flubber?

[TO BAD THIS DISCUSSANT DID NOT HOLD 86 TO THE FIRE AT THIS POINT. --DE]

You don't know about much of anything, troll.

[Agent 86 is again (his trademark) wasting eveyones time (to drive people
off) with a non-response and the ball is STILL in his court in defending the
proposition that the killer jet (whatever he sAYs it was) hit the ground
before going through the building. THIS KNOWINGLY ABSURD ASSERTION LEFT ON
THE TABLE WITH NO DEFENSE -- SHOULD BE ENOUGH TO DISCREDIT "AGENT 86" ON ALL
FORUMS IN THESE GROUPS. THE SECURITY CAMERA SHOWING A HORIZONTAL ATTACK, ALL
WITNESSES, THE PHOTOS OF THE LAWN ALL POINT TO THE FACT THAT THERE WAS NO
HIT ON THE GROUND -- WHAT PEOPLE MISTOOK FOR AN INTIAL CRASH ON THE LAWN
WAS THE SMOKE FROM THE MISSILE THAT WAS FIRED -- WITNESSES IN THAT SHORT
SECOND COULD NOT PROCESS WHAT THEY SAW -- AND SO THE SMOKE BECAME A CRASH
AND BOUNCE. SO, "AGENT 86" WHERE IS YOUR EVIDENCE THAT THE PLANE HIT THE
GROUND FIRST?

Or maybe you can show me an impact point where this massive
projectile "bounced" off of.

[Right on! But will he?]

Just because such a point is not apparent in the available
photographs, doesn't mean that it wasn't there. Lots of things
happened that would have obscured it, like parts of the building fell
on it perhaps.

Agent 86 is saying that he makes this assertion counter to all photographs
we know of on something other than photographs -- but what? I know it is
not what witnesses said. I've been writing to witnesses lately and they
scoff at the idea (see Sgt. Willima Lagasse's statment, for example.) So
if it is not based on witnesses and not based on the security camera
pictures or on the photographs of lawn and hole area taken BEFORE the wall
collapsed how can he assert a crash on the ground to absorb the energy of
the second engine!!

Agent 86 and all the other agents are trying to blow smoke up our
ehinds -- well I'm for pushing it back through their straws and forcing
them to eat it.

=============

Hee is more evidence of the totaly vacuity of the

Now you got 4 choices..
#1 Shut up.
#2 Provide factual proof that flight 77 went into the pentagon

It doesn't work that way. Those who make extraordinary
claims must prove them.

Correct.. Now where is that beyond a shadow of a doubt proof
that flight77 in the form of a 757 hit the pentagon?
I have seen 2 explanations. for 2 versions of reality.. Point
is that Mr Eastman has put more forward to answer questions
regarding 911 pentagon, then the govenment has. (I think it
is possible that Mr Eastman has nothing to hide..)

You're the one agreeing with the extraordinary claim that
Flight 77 didn't hit the Pentagon as part of Al Qaeda's
plot on Sept. 11.

I have to, since so many questions remain open because of
the burka of national security.. "Normal" people would wonder
why the burka of national security is nessecary in the case
of Pentagon 911 .. Common sense dictates "Only people that
are guilty have something to hide".. And whether that comes
in a legal form of a law or a lie, doesn't matter.
What about or what in the truth behind the actual happenings
of 911 can harm the national security of the most powerfull
country in history? Tell me tim.. You have such a vast resevoir
of knowledge, you surely can spill some of the beans?

You're apparently agreeing with Eastman's claim that large
numbers of US Gov. personel were involved in faking an
attack for some nefarious purpose.

Who benefits?

tim gueguen 101867

========

"for some nefarious purpose" you say? -- you mean you don't know the
specifics of the long long list of motivations that have been provided --
motivations involving trillions (oil, laundered opium/heroin revenues,
looting and "globalization plundering" of sovereign Iraq, contracts for
corporations and interest earnings for war-debt merchants etc. -- trillions
of dollars of incentive and the greatest (perceived) gains to power and
"security" of the small insulated ruling coterie led by Perle, Wolfowitz,
Kissinger etc. behind Donald Rumsfeld and President George W. Bush?

Anyway, I hope Tim will comment on this:

Dick Eastman
223 S. 64th Ave.
Yakima, Washington (not Langley, Virginia!)

[Everyman]

9-11 Investigators Compromised

caught! "AGENT FESCADO" & JARED ISRAEL PUTTING OUT MISLEADING DOCTORED
PHOTO DATA REGARDING PENTAGON ATTACK EVIDENCE !!!!



Here is the DOCTORED photo evidence that "Agent Fescado" made and which
Jared Israel prmotes on his website -- DISINFORMATION THAT HE USES TO
JUSTIFY CLOSING THE BOOK ON THE PENTAGON ATTACK IN FAVOR OF THE
ADMINISTRATION ACCOUNT OF THE CRASH:

Loading Image...

Fescado and Jared Israel each know that the piece of debris did not come
from the Boeing's port side -- the side of the killer jets path where the
piece was photographed. But the doctored the picture of the Boeing by
cropping off the nose and cockpit area, giving the mistaken impression that
the photo is of the port side and that, thus, the piece of debris could have
come from the port side.

Here are the photos regarding the true location of the piece of debris on a
757 -- facts which make just the opposite case of that of Fescado's doctored
evidence. This is the truth that F & I have been concealing from their
readers:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pentagon911/message/3



Fescado and Jared Israel have put out doctored information which they
prepared and which they use to close the investigation into the nature of
the attack upon the Pentagon, to discredit, with their phony doctored photo
evidence, strong supporting evidence of true nature of the crash -- and to
assist the government coverup.

So let us add Jared Israel and Agent Fescado to the list of known
disinformation agents masquarading as citizen 9/11 investigators, Mike
Rivero, Joe Vialls (former MI6), Jean-Pierre Desmoulins, Sara Roberts
(a.k.a., "spinner," "anablep," "stjarna," "ccummings," etc. etc.), John
Judge, the "People's Investigation of 9-11" and the National Commission.

You say I bring division to the pro-investigation committee?

I say you can't put an enemy greasy with deceit in your own defense
intelligence teams -- or else you get exactly what Jared Isral, Fescado
and the others have given us -- smoke up the ass.



BUT THERE IS MORE TO THIS UNCOVERED PHONY INVESTIGATOR DECEIT:

MORE DECEIT FROM JARED ISRAEL AND AGENT FESCADO:

ON "HUMANUNDERGROUND" WE FIND A QUOTATION FROM A LETTER OF STEVE RISKUS
RESPONDING WITH NO ATTRIBUTION TO THE INTERVIEWER (HIDING RESPONSIBILITY
THIS DECEIT) -- IN WHICH RISKUS IS QUOTED AS SAYING "IT KNOCKED OVER A FEW
LIGHT POLES" -- BUT THE "COMPILED FROM E-MAIL INTERVIEW" MADE BY FESCADO
AND POSTED BY J. ISRAEL NEGLECTS TO INCLUDE MY OWN FOLLOW-UP TO THAT
INTERVIEW WHICH I IMMEDIATELY SHARED WITH BOTH FESCADO AND ISRAEL IN WHICH
I ASKED RISKUS IF HE ACTUALLY SAW THE POLES BEING KNOCKED DOWN -- TO WHICH
QUESTION HE REPLIED HE HAD NOT SEEN THEM BEING HIT BUT HAD ONLY SEEN THEM
LATER AS HE WAS DRIVING AWAY. IN FACT, RISKUS'S FIRST PHOTOGRAPH ON THE
SCENE AND HIS STATEMENT THAT THE BOEING CROSSED IN FRONT OF HIM ONLY 100
FEET AWAY (WHICH NOW PROVES TO BE ONLY A SLIGHT EXAGERATION NOW THAT WE KNOW
WITHIN VERY TIGHT LIMITS THE ACTUAL PATH OF THE BOEING AS DISTINCT FROM THE
'KILLER JET' THAT IS THE PLANE THAT REALLY BROUGHT DOWN THOSE POLES! --
the path of the Boeing being north of the converging (but lower) path of the
killer jet.)

NOW I PERSONALLY MAILED MY FULL INTERVIEW TO BOTH FASCADO AND JARED ISRAEL
AT THE TIME -- SO THEY KNEW THE FACTS, SINCE WE HAVE BEEN FREQUENTLY IN
TOUCH WITH EACH OTHER --

IS IT POSSIBLE THAT FESCADO AND J. ISRAEL WERE NOT AWARE THAT "IF" THEY
COULD FIND SOMEONE WHO SAW THE ACTUAL BOEING APPROACHING FROM THAT FAR TO
THE SOUTHWEST OF THE CRASH ACTUALLY MOWING DOWN LAMP POSTS THAT THAT WOULD
BE THE END OF THE SMALL-KILLER JET THESIS -- AND THUS WOLFOWITZ, PERLE,
RUMSFELD, MEYER AND OTHER ZIONISTS PERPETRATORS OF THE 9-11 MURDERS WOULD BE
OUT OF THE HOT SEAT?

I ask you, fellows, why the hatchet job on the small plane explanation?
Why this disinformation and distortion of the true story???????

AGAIN: RISKUS DID NOT SEE THE POLES GO DOWN -- HE STATED THAT TO A
QUESTION THAT WAS INCLUDED IN THE VERY INTERVIEW THAT ISRAEL AND FESCADO
HAVE CHOPPED UP, RENDERED TOTALLY MISLEADING ON THE MOST IMPORTANT FACT IN
THE 9-11 EVENT, AND PUT IT OUT TO "CLOSE THE KILLER JET QUESTION " IN FAVOR
OF THE ADMINISTRATION. RISKUS ANSWERED MY SPECIFIC QUESTION ABOUT THE
POLES -- RISKUS ONLY NOTICED DOWN POLES ONLY AS HE WAS LEAVING AND,
HUNDREDS OF FEET FURTHER SOUTH, SAW THEM FROM HIS CAR WHEN DRIVING AWAY
(SOUTH) TO UPLOAD HIS PICTURES WHICH APPEARED AN HOUR LATER.

Jared Israel and Fescado are denying established fact about the 9-11 crime,
about the full truth and implications of the 9/11/01 Pentagon frameup
attack -- the evidence that should have impeached, removed and indicted
the Bush leadership 7 months ago!!!:

Dick Eastman
223 S. 64th Ave.
Yakima, Washington
Every man is responsible to every other man.




1- 34
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/9-11-demonstrative-evidence-of-frameup/message
s/1

35-40
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/9-11-demonstrative-evidence-of-frameup/message
s/35

==========

Just received:

Subject: THE LIMA DECLARATION: de-industrialising the developed countries,
transferring industry to third world countries


(1) The War on Truth, by John Pilger
(2) THE LIMA DECLARATION: de-industrialising the developed countries,
transferring industry to third world countries
(3) TIMELINE OF THE NEW INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC ORDER
(4) Outlining Australia's political path to poverty
(5) Lima agreement merely stated what had already been happening
(6) some folks believe that Israel is a client state of the US

(1) The War on Truth, by John Pilger

Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 11:50:20 EDT From: ***@aol.com

PS: It is important to note that Feith and Bolton are JINSA Zionist
extremists who wanted an invasion of Iraq for years...

In a message dated 8/1/03 4:24:58 AM Pacific Daylight Time, BCornickbabs
writes:

The War on Truth

Studies now put the death toll at as many as 10,000 civilians and 20,000
Iraqi troops. If this does not constitute a "bloodbath", what was the
massacre of 3,000 people at the twin towers?

John Pilger

07/31/03: (Z Net) In Baghdad, the rise and folly of rapacious imperial
power is commemorated in a forgotten cemetery called the North Gate.
Dogs are its visitors; the rusted gates are padlocked, and skeins of
traffic fumes hang over its parade of crumbling headstones and
unchanging historical truth.

Lieutenant-General Sir Stanley Maude is buried here, in a mausoleum
befitting his station, if not the cholera to which he succumbed. In
1917, he declared: "Our armies do not come...as conquerors or enemies,
but as liberators." Within three years, 10,000 had died in an uprising
against the British, who gassed and bombed those they called
"miscreants". It was an adventure from which British imperialism in the
Middle East never recovered.

Every day now, in the United States, the all-pervasive media tell
Americans that their bloodletting in Iraq is well under way, although
the true scale of the attacks is almost certainly concealed. Soon, more
soldiers will have been killed since the "liberation" than during the
invasion. Sustaining the myth of "mission" is becoming difficult, as in
Vietnam. This is not to doubt the real achievement of the invaders'
propaganda, which was the suppression of the truth that most Iraqis
opposed both the regime of Saddam Hussein and the Anglo-American assault
on their homeland. One reason the BBC's Andrew Gilligan angered Downing
Street was that he reported that, for many Iraqis, the bloody invasion
and occupation were at least as bad as the fallen dictatorship.

This is unmentionable here in America. The tens of thousands of Iraqi
dead and maimed do not exist. When I interviewed Douglas Feith, number
three to Donald Rumsfeld at the Pentagon, he shook his head and lectured
me on the "precision" of American weapons. His message was that war had
become a bloodless science in the service of America's unique divinity.
It was like interviewing a priest. Only American "boys" and "girls"
suffer, and at the hands of "Ba'athist remnants", a self-deluding term
in the spirit of General Maude's "miscreants". The media echo this,
barely gesturing at the truth of a popular resistance and publishing
galleries of GI amputees, who are described with a maudlin, down-home
chauvinism which celebrates the victimhood of the invader while casting
the vicious imperialism that they served as benign. At the State
Department, the under-secretary for international security, John Bolton,
suggested to me that, for questioning the fundamentalism of American
policy, I was surely a heretic, "a Communist Party member", as he put
it.

As for the great human catastrophe in Iraq, the bereft hospitals, the
children dying from thirst and gastroenteritis at a rate greater than
before the invasion, with almost 8 per cent of infants suffering extreme
malnutrition, says Unicef; as for a crisis in agriculture which, says
the Food and Agriculture Organisation, is on the verge of collapse:
these do not exist. Like the American-driven, medieval-type siege that
destroyed hundreds of thousands of Iraqi lives over 12 years, there is
no knowledge of this in America: therefore it did not happen. The Iraqis
are, at best, unpeople; at worst, tainted, to be hunted. "For every GI
killed," said a letter given prominence in the New York Daily News late
last month, "20 Iraqis must be executed." In the past week, Task Force
20, an "elite" American unit charged with hunting evildoers, murdered at
least five people as they drove down a street in Baghdad, and that was
typical.

The august New York Times and Washington Post are not, of course, as
crude as the News and Murdoch. However, on 23 July, both papers gave
front-page prominence to the government's carefully manipulated
"homecoming" of 20-year-old Private Jessica Lynch, who was injured in a
traffic accident during the invasion and captured. She was cared for by
Iraqi doctors, who probably saved her life and who risked their own
lives in trying to return her to American forces. The official version,
that she bravely fought off Iraqi attackers, is a pack of lies, like her
"rescue" (from an almost deserted hospital), which was filmed with
night-vision cameras by a Hollywood director. All this is known in
Washington, and much of it has been reported.

This did not deter the best and worst of American journalism uniting to
help stage-manage her beatific return to Elizabeth, West Virginia, with
the Times reporting the Pentagon's denial of "embellishing" and that
"few people seemed to care about the controversy". According to the
Post, the whole affair had been "muddied by conflicting media accounts".
George Orwell described this as "words falling upon the facts like soft
snow, blurring their outlines and covering up all the details". Thanks
to the freest press on earth, most Americans, according to a national
poll, believe Iraq was behind the 11 September attacks. "We have been
the victims of the biggest cover-up manoeuvre of all time," says Jane
Harman, a rare voice in Congress. But that, too, is an illusion.

The verboten truth is that the unprovoked attack on Iraq and the looting
of its resources is America's 73rd colonial intervention. These,
together with hundreds of bloody covert operations, have been covered up
by a system and a veritable tradition of state-sponsored lies that reach
back to the genocidal campaigns against Native Americans and the
attendant frontier myths; and the Spanish-American war, which broke out
after Spain was falsely accused of sinking an American warship, the
Maine, and war fever was whipped up by the Hearst newspapers; and the
non-existent "missile gap" between the US and the Soviet Union, which
was based on fake documents given to journalists in 1960 and served to
accelerate the nuclear arms race; and four years later, the non-existent
Vietnamese attack on two American destroyers in the Gulf of Tonkin for
which the media demanded reprisals, giving President Johnson the pretext
he wanted to bomb North Vietnam.

In the late 1970s, a silent media allowed President Carter to arm
Indonesia as it slaughtered the East Timorese, and to begin secret
support for the mujahedin, from which came the Taliban and al-Qaeda. In
the 1980s, the manufacture of an absurdity, the "threat" to America from
popular movements in Central America, notably the Sandinistas in tiny
Nicaragua, allowed President Reagan to arm and support terrorist groups
such as the Contras, leaving an estimated 70,000 dead. That George W
Bush's America gives refuge to hundreds of Latin American torturers,
favoured murderous dictators and anti-Castro hijackers, terrorists by
any definition, is almost never reported. Neither is the work of a
"training school" at Fort Benning, Georgia, whose graduates would be the
pride of Osama Bin Laden.

Americans, says Time magazine, live in "an eternal present". The point
is, they have no choice. The "mainstream" media are now dominated by
Rupert Murdoch's Fox television network, which had a good war. The
Federal Communications Commission, run by Colin Powell's son Michael, is
finally to deregulate television so that Fox and four other
conglomerates control 90 per cent of the terrestrial and cable audience.
Moreover, the leading 20 internet sites are now owned by the likes of
Fox, Disney, AOL Time Warner and a clutch of other giants. Just 14
companies attract 60 per cent of the time all American web-users spend
online.

The director of Le Monde Diplomatique, Ignacio Ramonet, summed this up
well: "To justify a preventive war that the United Nations and global
public opinion did not want, a machine for propaganda and mystification,
organised by the doctrinaire sect around George Bush, produced
state-sponsored lies with a determination characteristic of the worst
regimes of the 20th century."

Most of the lies were channelled straight to Downing Street from the
24-hour Office of Global Communications in the White House. Many were
the invention of a highly secret unit in the Pentagon, called the Office
of Special Plans, which "sexed up" raw intelligence, much of it uttered
by Tony Blair. It was here that many of the most famous lies about
weapons of mass destruction were "crafted". On 9 July, Donald Rumsfeld
said, with a smile, that America never had "dramatic new evidence" and
his deputy Paul Wolfowitz earlier revealed that the "issue of weapons of
mass destruction" was "for bureaucratic reasons" only, "because it was
the one reason [for invading Iraq] that everyone could agree on."

The Blair government's attacks on the BBC make sense as part of this.
They are not only a distraction from Blair's criminal association with
the Bush gang, though for a less than obvious reason. As the astute
American media commentator Danny Schechter points out, the BBC's
revenues have grown to $5.6bn; more Americans watch the BBC in America
than watch BBC1 in Britain; and what Murdoch and the other ascendant TV
conglomerates have long wanted is the BBC "checked, broken up, even
privatised...All this money and power will likely become the target for
Blair government regulators and the merry men of Ofcom, who want to
contain public enterprises and serve those avaricious private businesses
who would love to slice off some of the BBC's market share." As if on
cue, Tessa Jowell, the British Culture Secretary, questioned the renewal
of the BBC's charter.

The irony of this, says Schechter, is that the BBC was always solidly
pro-war. He cites a comprehensive study by Media Tenor, the non-partisan
institute that he founded, which analysed the war coverage of some of
the world's leading broadcasters and found that the BBC allowed less
dissent than all of them, including the US networks. A study by Cardiff
University found much the same. More often than not, the BBC amplified
the inventions of the lie machine in Washington, such as Iraq's
non-existent attack on Kuwait with scuds. And there was Andrew Marr's
memorable victory speech outside 10 Downing Street: "[Tony Blair] said
that they would be able to take Baghdad without a bloodbath, and that in
the end the Iraqis would be celebrating. And on both those points he has
been proved conclusively right."

Almost every word of that was misleading or nonsense. Studies now put
the death toll at as many as 10,000 civilians and 20,000 Iraqi troops.
If this does not constitute a "bloodbath", what was the massacre of
3,000 people at the twin towers?

In contrast, I was moved and almost relieved by the description of the
heroic Dr David Kelly by his family. "David's professional life," they
wrote, "was characterised by his integrity, honour and dedication to
finding the truth, often in the most difficult circumstances. It is hard
to comprehend the enormity of this tragedy." There is little doubt that
a majority of the British people understand that David Kelly was the
antithesis of those who have shown themselves to be the agents of a
dangerous, rampant foreign power. Stopping this menace is now more
urgent than ever, for Iraqis and us. ==

-------------------------------

-------------------------------


(2) THE LIMA DECLARATION is de-industrialising the developed countries
by transferring industry to the third world countries

with commentary from Noel McDonald interspersed, shown *

http://www.alphalink.com.au/~noelmcd/lima.htm

Second General Conference of the United Nations Industrial Development
Organisation Lima, Peru, 12-26 March 1975

LIMA DECLARATION AND PLAN OF ACTION ON INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AND
CO-OPERATION

A. DECLARATION

1. The Second General Conference of the United Nations Industrial
Development Organisation, convened by General Assembly resolution 3087
(XXVIII) of 6 December 1973, entrusted with establishing the main
principles of industrialisation and defining the means by which the
international community as a whole might take action of a broad nature
in the field of industrial development within the framework of new forms
of international co-operation, with a view to the establishment of a new
international economic order, adopts the LIMA DECLARATION ON INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENT AND CO-OPERATION

* The net result of establishing principles of industrialisation
according to this document, is to de-industrialise the developed
countries by transferring industry to the third world countries

* The New International Economic Order that the Lima Declaration imposes
on member countries of the United Nations is only of benefit to
transnational companies and international financiers including the IMF
and World Bank group, it legalises the power to control world industry
and manufacture in the cheapest and most profitable countries.

4. Bearing in mind resolutions 3201 (S-VI) and 3202 (S-VI), of May
1974, adopted at the sixth special session of the General Assembly on
the Declaration and Programme of Action on the Establishment of a New
International Economic Order, according to which every effort should be
made by the international community to take measures to encourage the
industrialisation of the developing countries with a view to increasing
their share in world industrial production, as envisaged in the
International Development Strategy,

* The actual date of establishing the NIEO at the sixth General Assembly
was the 1st of May 1974, this date represents Communist Mayday, the
significance here is that the Lima Declaration imposes the immediate
goals of communism as spelt out by Stalin in 1942.

5. Recognising the urgent need to bring about the establishment of a
new international economic order based on equity, sovereign equality,
interdependence and co-operation, as has been expressed in the
Declaration and Programme of Action on the Establishment of a New
International Economic Order, in order to transform the present
structure of economic relations.

* The term interdependence is newspeak coined by the Club Of Rome, it
infers the ploy that world war will be prevented by ensuring that no
country may be self sufficient, and therefore will not make war on other
countries that supply essential goods.

* In reality, interdependence forces all countries into economic
servitude to the international banking cartel and transnationals.

25. Their resolve to ensure the speedy and effective implementation of
the principles of industrialisation laid down in the International
Development Strategy for the 1970s which is being adapted to the
Programme of Action on the Establishment of a New International Economic
Order;

* The United Nations had the goal of a New International Economic Order
before it was even formed, the International Development Strategy
commenced in 1961 and has been another venue for espousing the
rhetorical virtues of the NIEO and interdependence.

28. That, in view of the low percentage share of the developing
countries in total world industrial production, recalling General
Assembly resolution 3306 (XXIX), of 14 December 1974, and taking into
account the policy guide-lines and qualitative recommendations made in
the present Declaration, their share should be increased to the maximum
possible extent and as far as possible to at least 25 percent of total
world industrial production by the year 2000, while making every
endeavour to ensure that the industrial growth so achieved is
distributed among developing countries as evenly as possible. This
implies that the developing countries should increase their industrial
growth rate considerably higher than the 8 percent recommended in the
International Development Strategy for the Second United Nations
Development Decade;

* This is the real crunchline that Australia had to prepare and
legislate to transfer Australian industry to the third world by the year
2000.

* This has been happening ever since Whitlam committed Australia in
1975, the two party system followed on preparations with Fraser, Hawke,
Keating and now Howard completing the task that he has been nurturing
since 1979 when he was Treasurer .

* So secretive have been the preparations for the NIEO that even now
most Australians believe that our recession we had to have was an
accident, Franklin Delano Roosevelt once said that if something happens
in the world of politics, you can be sure it was made to happen!

32. That every State has the inalienable right to exercise freely its
sovereignty and permanent control over its natural resources, both
terrestrial and marine, and over all economic activity for the
exploitation of these resources in the manner appropriate to its
circumstances, including nationalisation in accordance with its laws as
an expression of this right and that no State shall be subjected to any
forms of economic, political or other coercion which impedes the full
and free exercise of that inalienable right;

* This is typical Animal Farm rhetoric here!

* The LIMA/NIEO has forced Australia to relinquish all and any economic
sovereignty she once possessed, the conditions of the LIMA/NIEO have
reduced Australia to a debt ridden backwater running at a huge loss,
this guarantees that the International Monetary Fund can and have been
dictating Australian financial policy for some years, look at the IMF
conditions being imposed in Korea, Japan, Russia and Mexico, and realise
that we are no different, only kept uninformed!

59. The developed countries should adopt the following measure:

(a) Progressive elimination or reduction of tariff and non-tariff
barriers and other obstacles to trade, taking into account the special
characteristics of the trade of the developing countries, with a view to
improving the international framework for the conduct of world trade.
Adherence to the fullest extent possible to the principle of the
"standstill" on imports from developing countries and recognition of the
need for prior consultation where feasible and appropriate in the event
that special circumstances warrant a modification of the "standstill";

(b) Adoption of trade measures designed to ensure increased exports of
manufactured and semi-manufactured products including processed
agricultural products from the developing to the developed countries:

(c) Facilitate development of new and strengthen existing policies,
taking into account their economic structure and economic, social and
security objectives, which would encourage their industries which are
less competitive internationally to move progressively into more viable
lines of production or into other sectors of the economy, thus leading
to structural adjustments within the developed countries, and
redeployment of the productive capacities of such industries to
developing countries and promotion of a higher degree of utilisation of
natural resources and people in the latter:

* These are the guidelines that Keating, Button and other key
politicians have been parroting or espousing, the LIMA/NIEO demands the
reduction of tariffs, removal of impediments to free trade, and the
advice that Australia should move into alternatives to manufacturing and
industry.

* This disgraceful, secretive document is the virtual blueprint for
Australia's complete economic makeover, it was the driving force for the
Campbell and Martin reports that preceded the deregulation of the
economy in 1983!

60.

(l) Preference should be given by the more industrialised developing
countries, as far as possible, to imports of goods produced by the less
industrialised countries. Positive policies are needed to increase
intra-regional and inter-regional trade in manufactures:

* Even more instructions to the government to put other countries
interests before the interest and welfare of Australia contrary to the
constitutional requirement of Treasury to provide full employment for
all Australians. ==

-------------------------------

-------------------------------


(3) TIMELINE OF THE NEW INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC ORDER

http://www.alphalink.com.au/~noelmcd/hansard/nieotime.htm

1952

May 24-31 Moscow economic conference to extend world economic ties .
First post war meeting to prepare the groundwork for the future NIEO
Keesing's Archives P.12240 1974

May 1 United Nations general assembly adopts the program of action on
the NIEO May 1 is of course Communist May-day 1975

March 12-26 Release of the U.N.I.D.O. LIMA DECLARATION and plan of
action to establish a NEW INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC ORDER This agrees to
transfer our industry base to the third world countries by the year 2000
1975 Report where Senator D.R. Willesee of the Whitlam government
attended an August meeting of foreign ministers at Lima, Peru. This is
the acceptance of the NIEO by the foreign minister without parliamentary
debate Foreign Affairs page 514 . 1975 D.R. Willesee reports that the
NIEO implies an entirely reshaped economic system. Foreign Affairs p621.
1975 United Nations reports. Page 694 states that developed countries
are asked to restructure their industries in order to deploy production
capacity to developing countries. Foreign Affairs p690. 1978

August Implications for Australia of a NIEO. Hon A. Peacock Economic
Rationalist rhetoric confirming the fact of the NIEO AFAR p396 1979

18 Jan. Treasurer John Howard established a committee to inquire into
the Australian financial system. This report would take three years to
complete. It obviously was not going to matter at the conclusion whether
the Liberals where still empowered This report also runs parallel with
the NIEO inquiry 1979

March 14- June22 Hansard transcript....Senate Inquiry. The New
International Economic Order-Implications for Australia p46 domestic
compensation to the victims here...... rendered unemployed. p71 retrain
displaced workers from the industries losing its protection p220
multinationals policy of transferring manufacturing industries to where
labour is cheap p861 NIEO ...detrimental to the interests of both
developed and developing countries p888 possible adverse effects of NIEO
in practise p893 serious adverse implications for Australia's ...
economic welfare p1320 we can see the number of unemployed in our
manufacturing industries This inquiry in 1979 was four years after the
adoption, it should have preceded the agreement) 1981

September Confirms the 1952 Moscow conference as laying out the NIEO
program. Intelligence Survey p6 1981

29 Sep. Australian Financial System. final report released. Otherwise
known as the Campbell report 1982 A New Financial Revolution? The Centre
For Independent Studies. This book describes the Campbell Report as the
most important blueprint for financial reform in the history of
Australia. 1982 The Australian Financial System after the Campbell
Report. J.O.N. Perkins Adds weight to the fact of the inquiry and it's
importance. 1982

10 March. Incorporation into Hansard of resolutions by the
Inter-Parliamentary Union adopting the NIEO and the LIMA DEC. Hansard
p818 1982

July Australian Labor Party. Platform Constitution and Rules. p70 work
for a new and just world economic order p71...towards realisation of a
New International Economic Order 1983

29 May Australian Financial System. Report of the review group. ( The
Martin Report ) This report was commissioned by Treasurer Keating to
follow on from the Campbell report and provided the blueprint for the
recession we had to have 1983

December Australian dollar floated. 1985

29 Nov Mr A.C. Rocher queries foreign affairs on aspects of the LIMA
DEC. Leaving no doubt of its implementation and effect. Hansard p4256
1986

29 May Mr B.J. Conquest queries some negative aspects of the LIMA DEC.
Barry Jones responds with Economic Rationalist rhetoric Hansard p4325
1987

Jan 5 ALP Platform called for establishment of a NIEO under UN control.
The nation's PM Robert Hawke endorses all the subversion in the
platform, and is also a proud member of the openly socialist Fabian
society. At the 100th anniversary dinner of the Fabians Hawke proclaimed
the entire strategy of his government was based on the Fabian plan.
Australia's independence is being deliberately transferred to a world
government. The NEW AMERICAN p57 1989 The Deregulation of the Australian
Financial System. J.O.N. Perkins. On page five this book directly
attributes the internationalisation of the Australian economy to the
theme of the Campbell report, It also confirms on the same page that the
Martin Report mirrored the Campbell report that Labor had opposed in
opposition. ==

-------------------------------

-------------------------------


(4) Outlining Australia's political path to poverty

http://www.alphalink.com.au/~noelmcd/index.htm

There can be no mistaking the intent and actions of Australian political
parties to remove economic prosperity from the people of Australia. This
was heavily accelerated in 1975 by the Whitlam regime, launching
Australia on it's downward spiral into endemic debt and poverty. The
Lima Declaration was accepted by the Foreign Affairs Minister Senator
D.R.Willessee, without the knowledge of Parliament. Thus ensuring that
Australia would wind down Industry, Manufacturing and Farming. The Lima
Declaration also required that we relinquish Monetary Control over the
Economy & Banking.

Every Government since 1974 has worked steadfastly towards the goals of
the Lima Declaration and the target year of 2000. The secretive 1979
Parliamentary Inquiry into the ramifications of the Lima conditions was
conducted under a "D" Notice. The dire warnings for Australia were
manyfold at this Inquiry. Treasurer John Howard did not even wait for
the Inquiry, setting the Campbell Inquiry in motion before the damning
Inquiry. Treasurer Paul Keating continued the sellout of the Nation of
Australia with his Martin Inquiry (commonly known as Campbell MkII)
Little wonder that Paul Keating knew that it was the recession we had to
have!

Because money is the most powerful medium by which a Nation can be
controlled, many preparations have been implemented over the decades to
achieve total control in this area. What we are talking about here is
the unseen hand behind the scenes, the Money Power. The Money Power

The Money Power is a term that was very much in vogue in the past. It
refers to the collective group of International financiers, investors
and bankers. The very rich and powerful who are able to use politicians
and bureaucrats to their advantage! Loss of the Peoples' Bank in 1923.

The new Federation of Australia made a momentous move towards
independance in 1911. A Bill was introduced into Parliament to establish
a CommonWealth Bank, run by a Governor on behalf of the people of
Australia. This new Bank opened on the 15th July 1912, and did indeed
serve as a Peoples' Bank until the death of the Governor, Sir Denison
Miller in 1923. Agents of the Money Power then ensured that the
CommonWealth became a Bankers' Bank, thus restoring the cruel monopoly
that the Banking Brotherhood enjoyed before 1911. The 1935 Tasmanian
Monetary Inquiry.

The never ending onslought and theft of the wealth of the people
resulted in a Parliamentary Inquiry in 1935. It was time to address the
long standing issue of the Banks versus the people. The select committee
held eighteen meetings to discover why the people were being prevented
from enjoying the increase of wealth that should accrue from the
increase in production over the previous thirty years. They demonstrated
that the faster industry functions...the faster that total debts to the
banking system increases! The committee also proved that new money comes
into existence through new bank loans, thus destroying the myth that
Government creates monies. The 1953 International Taxation Act.

The Money Power achieved another momentous lever over the locals in
1953, when the Double Taxation Bill was enacted into legislation. The
resulting International Taxation Act has meant that Foreign Investment
was no longer compelled to pay their share of the tax burden. This is
one of the main reasons that Foreign Investment has been able to
displace Australian Owned enterprise. The 1975 Lima Declaration.

Getting huge tax advantage was not enough for the greed of the Money
Power. Using the United Nations to advantage meant that the ultra
secretive Lima Declaration could be imposed on the Nation of Australia
with very few of the electorate ever realising. The conditions of the
Lima were imposed without discussion taking place in Parliament for four
more years, by then the conditions of Industry Transfer were well
entrenched. The 1979 NIEO Inquiry.

Buried within the Lima Declaration was the blueprint for future
recession. This was the all encompassing New International Economic
Order [NIEO] This Inquiry outlined many warnings which have now come to
pass. The extent of Foreign Ownership, the dis-employed,and certainly
the adverse implications for Australia's economic welfare. The 1979
Campbell Inquiry.

Announced by Treasurer John Howard on the 18th January 1979, the
Campbell Inquiry produced nothing more than a blueprint for the Money
Power to usurp economic sovereignty over the Nation of Austtralia. The
first criteria listed in the Terms of Reference was that of national
economic prosperity. Of course quite the opposite has occurred, all the
dire warnings poined out by the parralel NIEO Inquiry were conveniently
ignored! The final report was presented by the Treasurer on 29th
September 1981, two years and nine months after commencing. The 1983
Martin Inquiry.

On the 29th May 1983, Treasurer Keating announced a Committee of Inquiry
into the Australian financial system, to be chaired by Mr V Martin of
the Mutual Life and Citizen' Assurance Company. This was little more
than a rubber stamp of the Campbell Inquiry, the Liberal/Labor coalition
demonstrated excellent teamwork in implementing the NIEO. The 1983
De-regulation.

According to J.O.N. Perkins, in his book The Deregulation of the
Australian Financial System, the process of extensive deregulation had
been set in train before the Final Report of the Campbell Committee was
even published. The Martin Report confirmed the broad lines of the
Campbell recommendations, thus confirming the fact that both major
parties merely follow the dictates of the Money Power. The Australian
Dollar was floated in December 1983, just as the same arrangements had
been put into place in Britain in 1979.

-------------------------------

-------------------------------


(5) Lima agreement merely stated what had already been happening

Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 08:23:23 +1000 From: "John Craig"
<***@brisbane.apana.org.au>

The 1975 Lima agreement (see QUOTE below) through UNIDO merely stated
what had already been happening for about a decade - and recommended
that UNIDO be the agency which made it happen. And as far as I know
organising that declaration was all that UNIDO actually did.

XXXXX QUOTE: from http://www.gwb.com.au/gwb/news/lima/

A call for change was made in March 1975 when the Second General
Conference of the United Nations Industrial Development Organisation
(UNIDO), meeting in Lima, issued a Declaration and World Plan of Action.

The Lima Declaration and Plan of Action calls for the redistribution of
world industry so that developing countries would have 25% of it by the
year 2000. To achieve this, radical changes in traditional concepts and
practices are recommended. Economic growth in poorer countries could no
longer be seen as the "trickle down" benefit of growth in rich
countries. To close the gap between richa nd poor nations the developing
countries would have to grow faster than the developed countries. With
this end in mind, the Lima Declaration sets out the "main principles of
industrialisation" and defines the "means by which the international
community as a whole might take broad action to establish a New
International Economic Order".

The Declaration envisages a process of "continuous consultations" in
redeploying world industry and bringing about a new didvision of labour
internationally. To facilitate this, it was recommended that UNIDO
become a specialised agency of the United Nations, with a new Industrial
Development Fund, and undertake the central co-ordinating role in
changing the world industrial map.

The Lima Declaration calls upon the developed countries to eliminate
barriers to trade with developing countries and encourage their
manufactured exports. They are asked to "restructure" their industries
in order to deploy production capacity to developing countries and to
expand technical assistance programmes. They are also asked to
co-operate in ensuring that the activities of transnational corporations
conform to the economic and social aims of developing countries in which
they operate. They are further asked to avoid discriminatory and
aggressive acts against States which exercise sovereign rights over
their own natural resources. All these recommendations are, in differing
degrees, matters of controversy. But encouragingly, there is no question
of the general direction of change recommended - that of industrialising
the poorer countries.

END QUOTE XXXXXXXXXXXXXX

However the spread of industrialization has raised living standards in
many of what were once third world countries [though it did not do so in
countries who did not participate in the globalization process].

Any problems in job numbers and quality in 1st world are (as far as I
can see) partly a consequence of using ineffectual economic development
tactics (see
http://cpds.apana.org.au/Documents/Defects_ETSO/Defects_in_Economic_Tact
ics.htm)

-------------------------------

-------------------------------


(6) some folks believe that Israel is a client state of the US

Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 23:07:39 -0700 From: ***@tucradio.org

There are still some folks who believe that Israel is a client state of
the US and that the humiliation t of every US president since Johnson at
the hands of whoever happens to be Israel's Prime Minister is just an
act. While America stands astride the planet as the world's only
superpower, Israel, now in the person of Sharon, sits on its shoulders,
giving orders re the Middle East. That 50 members of the US Congress are
about to go to Israel on a trip led by AIPAC may give those willing to
go beyond the "conventional wisdom" concerning the US-Israel
relationship, some idea of where the source of Israel's power
originates.

Jeff B

[n***@columbus.rr.com]

Everyman, your suffering from some psychopathic delusion. I've told you that
before. See a doctor.

Post by Everyman
9-11 Investigators Compromised
caught! "AGENT FESCADO" & JARED ISRAEL PUTTING OUT MISLEADING DOCTORED
PHOTO DATA REGARDING PENTAGON ATTACK EVIDENCE !!!!
Here is the DOCTORED photo evidence that "Agent Fescado" made and which
Jared Israel prmotes on his website -- DISINFORMATION THAT HE USES TO
JUSTIFY CLOSING THE BOOK ON THE PENTAGON ATTACK IN FAVOR OF THE
http://www.humanunderground.com/11september/s11-media/et7.jpg
Fescado and Jared Israel each know that the piece of debris did not come
from the Boeing's port side -- the side of the killer jets path where the
piece was photographed. But the doctored the picture of the Boeing by
cropping off the nose and cockpit area, giving the mistaken impression that
the photo is of the port side and that, thus, the piece of debris could have
come from the port side.
Here are the photos regarding the true location of the piece of debris on a
757 -- facts which make just the opposite case of that of Fescado's doctored
evidence. This is the truth that F & I have been concealing from their
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pentagon911/message/3
Fescado and Jared Israel have put out doctored information which they
prepared and which they use to close the investigation into the nature of
the attack upon the Pentagon, to discredit, with their phony doctored photo
evidence, strong supporting evidence of true nature of the crash -- and to
assist the government coverup.
So let us add Jared Israel and Agent Fescado to the list of known
disinformation agents masquarading as citizen 9/11 investigators, Mike
Rivero, Joe Vialls (former MI6), Jean-Pierre Desmoulins, Sara Roberts
(a.k.a., "spinner," "anablep," "stjarna," "ccummings," etc. etc.), John
Judge, the "People's Investigation of 9-11" and the National Commission.
You say I bring division to the pro-investigation committee?
I say you can't put an enemy greasy with deceit in your own defense
intelligence teams -- or else you get exactly what Jared Isral, Fescado
and the others have given us -- smoke up the ass.
ON "HUMANUNDERGROUND" WE FIND A QUOTATION FROM A LETTER OF STEVE RISKUS
RESPONDING WITH NO ATTRIBUTION TO THE INTERVIEWER (HIDING RESPONSIBILITY
THIS DECEIT) -- IN WHICH RISKUS IS QUOTED AS SAYING "IT KNOCKED OVER A FEW
LIGHT POLES" -- BUT THE "COMPILED FROM E-MAIL INTERVIEW" MADE BY FESCADO
AND POSTED BY J. ISRAEL NEGLECTS TO INCLUDE MY OWN FOLLOW-UP TO THAT
INTERVIEW WHICH I IMMEDIATELY SHARED WITH BOTH FESCADO AND ISRAEL IN WHICH
I ASKED RISKUS IF HE ACTUALLY SAW THE POLES BEING KNOCKED DOWN -- TO WHICH
QUESTION HE REPLIED HE HAD NOT SEEN THEM BEING HIT BUT HAD ONLY SEEN THEM
LATER AS HE WAS DRIVING AWAY. IN FACT, RISKUS'S FIRST PHOTOGRAPH ON THE
SCENE AND HIS STATEMENT THAT THE BOEING CROSSED IN FRONT OF HIM ONLY 100
FEET AWAY (WHICH NOW PROVES TO BE ONLY A SLIGHT EXAGERATION NOW THAT WE KNOW
WITHIN VERY TIGHT LIMITS THE ACTUAL PATH OF THE BOEING AS DISTINCT FROM THE
'KILLER JET' THAT IS THE PLANE THAT REALLY BROUGHT DOWN THOSE POLES! --
the path of the Boeing being north of the converging (but lower) path of the
killer jet.)
NOW I PERSONALLY MAILED MY FULL INTERVIEW TO BOTH FASCADO AND JARED ISRAEL
AT THE TIME -- SO THEY KNEW THE FACTS, SINCE WE HAVE BEEN FREQUENTLY IN
TOUCH WITH EACH OTHER --
IS IT POSSIBLE THAT FESCADO AND J. ISRAEL WERE NOT AWARE THAT "IF"

THEY

Post by Everyman
COULD FIND SOMEONE WHO SAW THE ACTUAL BOEING APPROACHING FROM THAT FAR TO
THE SOUTHWEST OF THE CRASH ACTUALLY MOWING DOWN LAMP POSTS THAT THAT WOULD
BE THE END OF THE SMALL-KILLER JET THESIS -- AND THUS WOLFOWITZ, PERLE,
RUMSFELD, MEYER AND OTHER ZIONISTS PERPETRATORS OF THE 9-11 MURDERS WOULD BE
OUT OF THE HOT SEAT?
I ask you, fellows, why the hatchet job on the small plane explanation?
Why this disinformation and distortion of the true story???????
AGAIN: RISKUS DID NOT SEE THE POLES GO DOWN -- HE STATED THAT TO A
QUESTION THAT WAS INCLUDED IN THE VERY INTERVIEW THAT ISRAEL AND FESCADO
HAVE CHOPPED UP, RENDERED TOTALLY MISLEADING ON THE MOST IMPORTANT FACT IN
THE 9-11 EVENT, AND PUT IT OUT TO "CLOSE THE KILLER JET QUESTION " IN FAVOR
OF THE ADMINISTRATION. RISKUS ANSWERED MY SPECIFIC QUESTION ABOUT THE
POLES -- RISKUS ONLY NOTICED DOWN POLES ONLY AS HE WAS LEAVING AND,
HUNDREDS OF FEET FURTHER SOUTH, SAW THEM FROM HIS CAR WHEN DRIVING AWAY
(SOUTH) TO UPLOAD HIS PICTURES WHICH APPEARED AN HOUR LATER.
Jared Israel and Fescado are denying established fact about the 9-11 crime,
about the full truth and implications of the 9/11/01 Pentagon frameup
attack -- the evidence that should have impeached, removed and indicted
Dick Eastman
223 S. 64th Ave.
Yakima, Washington
Every man is responsible to every other man.
1- 34

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/9-11-demonstrative-evidence-of-frameup/message

Post by Everyman
s/1
35-40

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/9-11-demonstrative-evidence-of-frameup/message

Post by Everyman
s/35
==========
Subject: THE LIMA DECLARATION: de-industrialising the developed countries,
transferring industry to third world countries
(1) The War on Truth, by John Pilger
(2) THE LIMA DECLARATION: de-industrialising the developed countries,
transferring industry to third world countries
(3) TIMELINE OF THE NEW INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC ORDER
(4) Outlining Australia's political path to poverty
(5) Lima agreement merely stated what had already been happening
(6) some folks believe that Israel is a client state of the US
(1) The War on Truth, by John Pilger
PS: It is important to note that Feith and Bolton are JINSA Zionist
extremists who wanted an invasion of Iraq for years...
In a message dated 8/1/03 4:24:58 AM Pacific Daylight Time, BCornickbabs
The War on Truth
Studies now put the death toll at as many as 10,000 civilians and 20,000
Iraqi troops. If this does not constitute a "bloodbath", what was the
massacre of 3,000 people at the twin towers?
John Pilger
07/31/03: (Z Net) In Baghdad, the rise and folly of rapacious imperial
power is commemorated in a forgotten cemetery called the North Gate.
Dogs are its visitors; the rusted gates are padlocked, and skeins of
traffic fumes hang over its parade of crumbling headstones and
unchanging historical truth.
Lieutenant-General Sir Stanley Maude is buried here, in a mausoleum
befitting his station, if not the cholera to which he succumbed. In
1917, he declared: "Our armies do not come...as conquerors or enemies,
but as liberators." Within three years, 10,000 had died in an uprising
against the British, who gassed and bombed those they called
"miscreants". It was an adventure from which British imperialism in the
Middle East never recovered.
Every day now, in the United States, the all-pervasive media tell
Americans that their bloodletting in Iraq is well under way, although
the true scale of the attacks is almost certainly concealed. Soon, more
soldiers will have been killed since the "liberation" than during the
invasion. Sustaining the myth of "mission" is becoming difficult, as in
Vietnam. This is not to doubt the real achievement of the invaders'
propaganda, which was the suppression of the truth that most Iraqis
opposed both the regime of Saddam Hussein and the Anglo-American assault
on their homeland. One reason the BBC's Andrew Gilligan angered Downing
Street was that he reported that, for many Iraqis, the bloody invasion
and occupation were at least as bad as the fallen dictatorship.
This is unmentionable here in America. The tens of thousands of Iraqi
dead and maimed do not exist. When I interviewed Douglas Feith, number
three to Donald Rumsfeld at the Pentagon, he shook his head and lectured
me on the "precision" of American weapons. His message was that war had
become a bloodless science in the service of America's unique divinity.
It was like interviewing a priest. Only American "boys" and "girls"
suffer, and at the hands of "Ba'athist remnants", a self-deluding term
in the spirit of General Maude's "miscreants". The media echo this,
barely gesturing at the truth of a popular resistance and publishing
galleries of GI amputees, who are described with a maudlin, down-home
chauvinism which celebrates the victimhood of the invader while casting
the vicious imperialism that they served as benign. At the State
Department, the under-secretary for international security, John Bolton,
suggested to me that, for questioning the fundamentalism of American
policy, I was surely a heretic, "a Communist Party member", as he put
it.
As for the great human catastrophe in Iraq, the bereft hospitals, the
children dying from thirst and gastroenteritis at a rate greater than
before the invasion, with almost 8 per cent of infants suffering extreme
malnutrition, says Unicef; as for a crisis in agriculture which, says
these do not exist. Like the American-driven, medieval-type siege that
destroyed hundreds of thousands of Iraqi lives over 12 years, there is
no knowledge of this in America: therefore it did not happen. The Iraqis
are, at best, unpeople; at worst, tainted, to be hunted. "For every GI
killed," said a letter given prominence in the New York Daily News late
last month, "20 Iraqis must be executed." In the past week, Task Force
20, an "elite" American unit charged with hunting evildoers, murdered at
least five people as they drove down a street in Baghdad, and that was
typical.
The august New York Times and Washington Post are not, of course, as
crude as the News and Murdoch. However, on 23 July, both papers gave
front-page prominence to the government's carefully manipulated
"homecoming" of 20-year-old Private Jessica Lynch, who was injured in a
traffic accident during the invasion and captured. She was cared for by
Iraqi doctors, who probably saved her life and who risked their own
lives in trying to return her to American forces. The official version,
that she bravely fought off Iraqi attackers, is a pack of lies, like her
"rescue" (from an almost deserted hospital), which was filmed with
night-vision cameras by a Hollywood director. All this is known in
Washington, and much of it has been reported.
This did not deter the best and worst of American journalism uniting to
help stage-manage her beatific return to Elizabeth, West Virginia, with
the Times reporting the Pentagon's denial of "embellishing" and that
"few people seemed to care about the controversy". According to the
Post, the whole affair had been "muddied by conflicting media accounts".
George Orwell described this as "words falling upon the facts like soft
snow, blurring their outlines and covering up all the details". Thanks
to the freest press on earth, most Americans, according to a national
poll, believe Iraq was behind the 11 September attacks. "We have been
the victims of the biggest cover-up manoeuvre of all time," says Jane
Harman, a rare voice in Congress. But that, too, is an illusion.
The verboten truth is that the unprovoked attack on Iraq and the looting
of its resources is America's 73rd colonial intervention. These,
together with hundreds of bloody covert operations, have been covered up
by a system and a veritable tradition of state-sponsored lies that reach
back to the genocidal campaigns against Native Americans and the
attendant frontier myths; and the Spanish-American war, which broke out
after Spain was falsely accused of sinking an American warship, the
Maine, and war fever was whipped up by the Hearst newspapers; and the
non-existent "missile gap" between the US and the Soviet Union, which
was based on fake documents given to journalists in 1960 and served to
accelerate the nuclear arms race; and four years later, the non-existent
Vietnamese attack on two American destroyers in the Gulf of Tonkin for
which the media demanded reprisals, giving President Johnson the pretext
he wanted to bomb North Vietnam.
In the late 1970s, a silent media allowed President Carter to arm
Indonesia as it slaughtered the East Timorese, and to begin secret
support for the mujahedin, from which came the Taliban and al-Qaeda. In
the 1980s, the manufacture of an absurdity, the "threat" to America from
popular movements in Central America, notably the Sandinistas in tiny
Nicaragua, allowed President Reagan to arm and support terrorist groups
such as the Contras, leaving an estimated 70,000 dead. That George W
Bush's America gives refuge to hundreds of Latin American torturers,
favoured murderous dictators and anti-Castro hijackers, terrorists by
any definition, is almost never reported. Neither is the work of a
"training school" at Fort Benning, Georgia, whose graduates would be the
pride of Osama Bin Laden.
Americans, says Time magazine, live in "an eternal present". The point
is, they have no choice. The "mainstream" media are now dominated by
Rupert Murdoch's Fox television network, which had a good war. The
Federal Communications Commission, run by Colin Powell's son Michael, is
finally to deregulate television so that Fox and four other
conglomerates control 90 per cent of the terrestrial and cable audience.
Moreover, the leading 20 internet sites are now owned by the likes of
Fox, Disney, AOL Time Warner and a clutch of other giants. Just 14
companies attract 60 per cent of the time all American web-users spend
online.
The director of Le Monde Diplomatique, Ignacio Ramonet, summed this up
well: "To justify a preventive war that the United Nations and global
public opinion did not want, a machine for propaganda and mystification,
organised by the doctrinaire sect around George Bush, produced
state-sponsored lies with a determination characteristic of the worst
regimes of the 20th century."
Most of the lies were channelled straight to Downing Street from the
24-hour Office of Global Communications in the White House. Many were
the invention of a highly secret unit in the Pentagon, called the Office
of Special Plans, which "sexed up" raw intelligence, much of it uttered
by Tony Blair. It was here that many of the most famous lies about
weapons of mass destruction were "crafted". On 9 July, Donald Rumsfeld
said, with a smile, that America never had "dramatic new evidence" and
his deputy Paul Wolfowitz earlier revealed that the "issue of weapons of
mass destruction" was "for bureaucratic reasons" only, "because it was
the one reason [for invading Iraq] that everyone could agree on."
The Blair government's attacks on the BBC make sense as part of this.
They are not only a distraction from Blair's criminal association with
the Bush gang, though for a less than obvious reason. As the astute
American media commentator Danny Schechter points out, the BBC's
revenues have grown to $5.6bn; more Americans watch the BBC in America
than watch BBC1 in Britain; and what Murdoch and the other ascendant TV
conglomerates have long wanted is the BBC "checked, broken up, even
privatised...All this money and power will likely become the target for
Blair government regulators and the merry men of Ofcom, who want to
contain public enterprises and serve those avaricious private businesses
who would love to slice off some of the BBC's market share." As if on
cue, Tessa Jowell, the British Culture Secretary, questioned the renewal
of the BBC's charter.
The irony of this, says Schechter, is that the BBC was always solidly
pro-war. He cites a comprehensive study by Media Tenor, the non-partisan
institute that he founded, which analysed the war coverage of some of
the world's leading broadcasters and found that the BBC allowed less
dissent than all of them, including the US networks. A study by Cardiff
University found much the same. More often than not, the BBC amplified
the inventions of the lie machine in Washington, such as Iraq's
non-existent attack on Kuwait with scuds. And there was Andrew Marr's
memorable victory speech outside 10 Downing Street: "[Tony Blair] said
that they would be able to take Baghdad without a bloodbath, and that in
the end the Iraqis would be celebrating. And on both those points he has
been proved conclusively right."
Almost every word of that was misleading or nonsense. Studies now put
the death toll at as many as 10,000 civilians and 20,000 Iraqi troops.
If this does not constitute a "bloodbath", what was the massacre of
3,000 people at the twin towers?
In contrast, I was moved and almost relieved by the description of the
heroic Dr David Kelly by his family. "David's professional life," they
wrote, "was characterised by his integrity, honour and dedication to
finding the truth, often in the most difficult circumstances. It is hard
to comprehend the enormity of this tragedy." There is little doubt that
a majority of the British people understand that David Kelly was the
antithesis of those who have shown themselves to be the agents of a
dangerous, rampant foreign power. Stopping this menace is now more
urgent than ever, for Iraqis and us. ==
-------------------------------
-------------------------------
(2) THE LIMA DECLARATION is de-industrialising the developed countries
by transferring industry to the third world countries
with commentary from Noel McDonald interspersed, shown *
http://www.alphalink.com.au/~noelmcd/lima.htm
Second General Conference of the United Nations Industrial Development
Organisation Lima, Peru, 12-26 March 1975
LIMA DECLARATION AND PLAN OF ACTION ON INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AND
CO-OPERATION
A. DECLARATION
1. The Second General Conference of the United Nations Industrial
Development Organisation, convened by General Assembly resolution 3087
(XXVIII) of 6 December 1973, entrusted with establishing the main
principles of industrialisation and defining the means by which the
international community as a whole might take action of a broad nature
in the field of industrial development within the framework of new forms
of international co-operation, with a view to the establishment of a new
international economic order, adopts the LIMA DECLARATION ON INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENT AND CO-OPERATION
* The net result of establishing principles of industrialisation
according to this document, is to de-industrialise the developed
countries by transferring industry to the third world countries
* The New International Economic Order that the Lima Declaration imposes
on member countries of the United Nations is only of benefit to
transnational companies and international financiers including the IMF
and World Bank group, it legalises the power to control world industry
and manufacture in the cheapest and most profitable countries.
4. Bearing in mind resolutions 3201 (S-VI) and 3202 (S-VI), of May
1974, adopted at the sixth special session of the General Assembly on
the Declaration and Programme of Action on the Establishment of a New
International Economic Order, according to which every effort should be
made by the international community to take measures to encourage the
industrialisation of the developing countries with a view to increasing
their share in world industrial production, as envisaged in the
International Development Strategy,
* The actual date of establishing the NIEO at the sixth General Assembly
was the 1st of May 1974, this date represents Communist Mayday, the
significance here is that the Lima Declaration imposes the immediate
goals of communism as spelt out by Stalin in 1942.
5. Recognising the urgent need to bring about the establishment of a
new international economic order based on equity, sovereign equality,
interdependence and co-operation, as has been expressed in the
Declaration and Programme of Action on the Establishment of a New
International Economic Order, in order to transform the present
structure of economic relations.
* The term interdependence is newspeak coined by the Club Of Rome, it
infers the ploy that world war will be prevented by ensuring that no
country may be self sufficient, and therefore will not make war on other
countries that supply essential goods.
* In reality, interdependence forces all countries into economic
servitude to the international banking cartel and transnationals.
25. Their resolve to ensure the speedy and effective implementation of
the principles of industrialisation laid down in the International
Development Strategy for the 1970s which is being adapted to the
Programme of Action on the Establishment of a New International Economic
Order;
* The United Nations had the goal of a New International Economic Order
before it was even formed, the International Development Strategy
commenced in 1961 and has been another venue for espousing the
rhetorical virtues of the NIEO and interdependence.
28. That, in view of the low percentage share of the developing
countries in total world industrial production, recalling General
Assembly resolution 3306 (XXIX), of 14 December 1974, and taking into
account the policy guide-lines and qualitative recommendations made in
the present Declaration, their share should be increased to the maximum
possible extent and as far as possible to at least 25 percent of total
world industrial production by the year 2000, while making every
endeavour to ensure that the industrial growth so achieved is
distributed among developing countries as evenly as possible. This
implies that the developing countries should increase their industrial
growth rate considerably higher than the 8 percent recommended in the
International Development Strategy for the Second United Nations
Development Decade;
* This is the real crunchline that Australia had to prepare and
legislate to transfer Australian industry to the third world by the year
2000.
* This has been happening ever since Whitlam committed Australia in
1975, the two party system followed on preparations with Fraser, Hawke,
Keating and now Howard completing the task that he has been nurturing
since 1979 when he was Treasurer .
* So secretive have been the preparations for the NIEO that even now
most Australians believe that our recession we had to have was an
accident, Franklin Delano Roosevelt once said that if something happens
in the world of politics, you can be sure it was made to happen!
32. That every State has the inalienable right to exercise freely its
sovereignty and permanent control over its natural resources, both
terrestrial and marine, and over all economic activity for the
exploitation of these resources in the manner appropriate to its
circumstances, including nationalisation in accordance with its laws as
an expression of this right and that no State shall be subjected to any
forms of economic, political or other coercion which impedes the full
and free exercise of that inalienable right;
* This is typical Animal Farm rhetoric here!
* The LIMA/NIEO has forced Australia to relinquish all and any economic
sovereignty she once possessed, the conditions of the LIMA/NIEO have
reduced Australia to a debt ridden backwater running at a huge loss,
this guarantees that the International Monetary Fund can and have been
dictating Australian financial policy for some years, look at the IMF
conditions being imposed in Korea, Japan, Russia and Mexico, and realise
that we are no different, only kept uninformed!
(a) Progressive elimination or reduction of tariff and non-tariff
barriers and other obstacles to trade, taking into account the special
characteristics of the trade of the developing countries, with a view to
improving the international framework for the conduct of world trade.
Adherence to the fullest extent possible to the principle of the
"standstill" on imports from developing countries and recognition of the
need for prior consultation where feasible and appropriate in the event
that special circumstances warrant a modification of the "standstill";
(b) Adoption of trade measures designed to ensure increased exports of
manufactured and semi-manufactured products including processed
(c) Facilitate development of new and strengthen existing policies,
taking into account their economic structure and economic, social and
security objectives, which would encourage their industries which are
less competitive internationally to move progressively into more viable
lines of production or into other sectors of the economy, thus leading
to structural adjustments within the developed countries, and
redeployment of the productive capacities of such industries to
developing countries and promotion of a higher degree of utilisation of
* These are the guidelines that Keating, Button and other key
politicians have been parroting or espousing, the LIMA/NIEO demands the
reduction of tariffs, removal of impediments to free trade, and the
advice that Australia should move into alternatives to manufacturing and
industry.
* This disgraceful, secretive document is the virtual blueprint for
Australia's complete economic makeover, it was the driving force for the
Campbell and Martin reports that preceded the deregulation of the
economy in 1983!
60.
(l) Preference should be given by the more industrialised developing
countries, as far as possible, to imports of goods produced by the less
industrialised countries. Positive policies are needed to increase
* Even more instructions to the government to put other countries
interests before the interest and welfare of Australia contrary to the
constitutional requirement of Treasury to provide full employment for
all Australians. ==
-------------------------------
-------------------------------
(3) TIMELINE OF THE NEW INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC ORDER
http://www.alphalink.com.au/~noelmcd/hansard/nieotime.htm
1952
May 24-31 Moscow economic conference to extend world economic ties .
First post war meeting to prepare the groundwork for the future NIEO
Keesing's Archives P.12240 1974
May 1 United Nations general assembly adopts the program of action on
the NIEO May 1 is of course Communist May-day 1975
March 12-26 Release of the U.N.I.D.O. LIMA DECLARATION and plan of
action to establish a NEW INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC ORDER This agrees to
transfer our industry base to the third world countries by the year 2000
1975 Report where Senator D.R. Willesee of the Whitlam government
attended an August meeting of foreign ministers at Lima, Peru. This is
the acceptance of the NIEO by the foreign minister without parliamentary
debate Foreign Affairs page 514 . 1975 D.R. Willesee reports that the
NIEO implies an entirely reshaped economic system. Foreign Affairs p621.
1975 United Nations reports. Page 694 states that developed countries
are asked to restructure their industries in order to deploy production
capacity to developing countries. Foreign Affairs p690. 1978
August Implications for Australia of a NIEO. Hon A. Peacock Economic
Rationalist rhetoric confirming the fact of the NIEO AFAR p396 1979
18 Jan. Treasurer John Howard established a committee to inquire into
the Australian financial system. This report would take three years to
complete. It obviously was not going to matter at the conclusion whether
the Liberals where still empowered This report also runs parallel with
the NIEO inquiry 1979
March 14- June22 Hansard transcript....Senate Inquiry. The New
International Economic Order-Implications for Australia p46 domestic
compensation to the victims here...... rendered unemployed. p71 retrain
displaced workers from the industries losing its protection p220
multinationals policy of transferring manufacturing industries to where
labour is cheap p861 NIEO ...detrimental to the interests of both
developed and developing countries p888 possible adverse effects of NIEO
in practise p893 serious adverse implications for Australia's ...
economic welfare p1320 we can see the number of unemployed in our
manufacturing industries This inquiry in 1979 was four years after the
adoption, it should have preceded the agreement) 1981
September Confirms the 1952 Moscow conference as laying out the NIEO
program. Intelligence Survey p6 1981
29 Sep. Australian Financial System. final report released. Otherwise
known as the Campbell report 1982 A New Financial Revolution? The Centre
For Independent Studies. This book describes the Campbell Report as the
most important blueprint for financial reform in the history of
Australia. 1982 The Australian Financial System after the Campbell
Report. J.O.N. Perkins Adds weight to the fact of the inquiry and it's
importance. 1982
10 March. Incorporation into Hansard of resolutions by the
Inter-Parliamentary Union adopting the NIEO and the LIMA DEC. Hansard
p818 1982
July Australian Labor Party. Platform Constitution and Rules. p70 work
for a new and just world economic order p71...towards realisation of a
New International Economic Order 1983
29 May Australian Financial System. Report of the review group. ( The
Martin Report ) This report was commissioned by Treasurer Keating to
follow on from the Campbell report and provided the blueprint for the
recession we had to have 1983
December Australian dollar floated. 1985
29 Nov Mr A.C. Rocher queries foreign affairs on aspects of the LIMA
DEC. Leaving no doubt of its implementation and effect. Hansard p4256
1986
29 May Mr B.J. Conquest queries some negative aspects of the LIMA DEC.
Barry Jones responds with Economic Rationalist rhetoric Hansard p4325
1987
Jan 5 ALP Platform called for establishment of a NIEO under UN control.
The nation's PM Robert Hawke endorses all the subversion in the
platform, and is also a proud member of the openly socialist Fabian
society. At the 100th anniversary dinner of the Fabians Hawke proclaimed
the entire strategy of his government was based on the Fabian plan.
Australia's independence is being deliberately transferred to a world
government. The NEW AMERICAN p57 1989 The Deregulation of the Australian
Financial System. J.O.N. Perkins. On page five this book directly
attributes the internationalisation of the Australian economy to the
theme of the Campbell report, It also confirms on the same page that the
Martin Report mirrored the Campbell report that Labor had opposed in
opposition. ==
-------------------------------
-------------------------------
(4) Outlining Australia's political path to poverty
http://www.alphalink.com.au/~noelmcd/index.htm
There can be no mistaking the intent and actions of Australian political
parties to remove economic prosperity from the people of Australia. This
was heavily accelerated in 1975 by the Whitlam regime, launching
Australia on it's downward spiral into endemic debt and poverty. The
Lima Declaration was accepted by the Foreign Affairs Minister Senator
D.R.Willessee, without the knowledge of Parliament. Thus ensuring that
Australia would wind down Industry, Manufacturing and Farming. The Lima
Declaration also required that we relinquish Monetary Control over the
Economy & Banking.
Every Government since 1974 has worked steadfastly towards the goals of
the Lima Declaration and the target year of 2000. The secretive 1979
Parliamentary Inquiry into the ramifications of the Lima conditions was
conducted under a "D" Notice. The dire warnings for Australia were
manyfold at this Inquiry. Treasurer John Howard did not even wait for
the Inquiry, setting the Campbell Inquiry in motion before the damning
Inquiry. Treasurer Paul Keating continued the sellout of the Nation of
Australia with his Martin Inquiry (commonly known as Campbell MkII)
Little wonder that Paul Keating knew that it was the recession we had to
have!
Because money is the most powerful medium by which a Nation can be
controlled, many preparations have been implemented over the decades to
achieve total control in this area. What we are talking about here is
the unseen hand behind the scenes, the Money Power. The Money Power
The Money Power is a term that was very much in vogue in the past. It
refers to the collective group of International financiers, investors
and bankers. The very rich and powerful who are able to use politicians
and bureaucrats to their advantage! Loss of the Peoples' Bank in 1923.
The new Federation of Australia made a momentous move towards
independance in 1911. A Bill was introduced into Parliament to establish
a CommonWealth Bank, run by a Governor on behalf of the people of
Australia. This new Bank opened on the 15th July 1912, and did indeed
serve as a Peoples' Bank until the death of the Governor, Sir Denison
Miller in 1923. Agents of the Money Power then ensured that the
CommonWealth became a Bankers' Bank, thus restoring the cruel monopoly
that the Banking Brotherhood enjoyed before 1911. The 1935 Tasmanian
Monetary Inquiry.
The never ending onslought and theft of the wealth of the people
resulted in a Parliamentary Inquiry in 1935. It was time to address the
long standing issue of the Banks versus the people. The select committee
held eighteen meetings to discover why the people were being prevented
from enjoying the increase of wealth that should accrue from the
increase in production over the previous thirty years. They demonstrated
that the faster industry functions...the faster that total debts to the
banking system increases! The committee also proved that new money comes
into existence through new bank loans, thus destroying the myth that
Government creates monies. The 1953 International Taxation Act.
The Money Power achieved another momentous lever over the locals in
1953, when the Double Taxation Bill was enacted into legislation. The
resulting International Taxation Act has meant that Foreign Investment
was no longer compelled to pay their share of the tax burden. This is
one of the main reasons that Foreign Investment has been able to
displace Australian Owned enterprise. The 1975 Lima Declaration.
Getting huge tax advantage was not enough for the greed of the Money
Power. Using the United Nations to advantage meant that the ultra
secretive Lima Declaration could be imposed on the Nation of Australia
with very few of the electorate ever realising. The conditions of the
Lima were imposed without discussion taking place in Parliament for four
more years, by then the conditions of Industry Transfer were well
entrenched. The 1979 NIEO Inquiry.
Buried within the Lima Declaration was the blueprint for future
recession. This was the all encompassing New International Economic
Order [NIEO] This Inquiry outlined many warnings which have now come to
pass. The extent of Foreign Ownership, the dis-employed,and certainly
the adverse implications for Australia's economic welfare. The 1979
Campbell Inquiry.
Announced by Treasurer John Howard on the 18th January 1979, the
Campbell Inquiry produced nothing more than a blueprint for the Money
Power to usurp economic sovereignty over the Nation of Austtralia. The
first criteria listed in the Terms of Reference was that of national
economic prosperity. Of course quite the opposite has occurred, all the
dire warnings poined out by the parralel NIEO Inquiry were conveniently
ignored! The final report was presented by the Treasurer on 29th
September 1981, two years and nine months after commencing. The 1983
Martin Inquiry.
On the 29th May 1983, Treasurer Keating announced a Committee of Inquiry
into the Australian financial system, to be chaired by Mr V Martin of
the Mutual Life and Citizen' Assurance Company. This was little more
than a rubber stamp of the Campbell Inquiry, the Liberal/Labor coalition
demonstrated excellent teamwork in implementing the NIEO. The 1983
De-regulation.
According to J.O.N. Perkins, in his book The Deregulation of the
Australian Financial System, the process of extensive deregulation had
been set in train before the Final Report of the Campbell Committee was
even published. The Martin Report confirmed the broad lines of the
Campbell recommendations, thus confirming the fact that both major
parties merely follow the dictates of the Money Power. The Australian
Dollar was floated in December 1983, just as the same arrangements had
been put into place in Britain in 1979.
-------------------------------
-------------------------------
(5) Lima agreement merely stated what had already been happening
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 08:23:23 +1000 From: "John Craig"
The 1975 Lima agreement (see QUOTE below) through UNIDO merely stated
what had already been happening for about a decade - and recommended
that UNIDO be the agency which made it happen. And as far as I know
organising that declaration was all that UNIDO actually did.
XXXXX QUOTE: from http://www.gwb.com.au/gwb/news/lima/
A call for change was made in March 1975 when the Second General
Conference of the United Nations Industrial Development Organisation
(UNIDO), meeting in Lima, issued a Declaration and World Plan of Action.
The Lima Declaration and Plan of Action calls for the redistribution of
world industry so that developing countries would have 25% of it by the
year 2000. To achieve this, radical changes in traditional concepts and
practices are recommended. Economic growth in poorer countries could no
longer be seen as the "trickle down" benefit of growth in rich
countries. To close the gap between richa nd poor nations the developing
countries would have to grow faster than the developed countries. With
this end in mind, the Lima Declaration sets out the "main principles of
industrialisation" and defines the "means by which the international
community as a whole might take broad action to establish a New
International Economic Order".
The Declaration envisages a process of "continuous consultations" in
redeploying world industry and bringing about a new didvision of labour
internationally. To facilitate this, it was recommended that UNIDO
become a specialised agency of the United Nations, with a new Industrial
Development Fund, and undertake the central co-ordinating role in
changing the world industrial map.
The Lima Declaration calls upon the developed countries to eliminate
barriers to trade with developing countries and encourage their
manufactured exports. They are asked to "restructure" their industries
in order to deploy production capacity to developing countries and to
expand technical assistance programmes. They are also asked to
co-operate in ensuring that the activities of transnational corporations
conform to the economic and social aims of developing countries in which
they operate. They are further asked to avoid discriminatory and
aggressive acts against States which exercise sovereign rights over
their own natural resources. All these recommendations are, in differing
degrees, matters of controversy. But encouragingly, there is no question
of the general direction of change recommended - that of industrialising
the poorer countries.
END QUOTE XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
However the spread of industrialization has raised living standards in
many of what were once third world countries [though it did not do so in
countries who did not participate in the globalization process].
Any problems in job numbers and quality in 1st world are (as far as I
can see) partly a consequence of using ineffectual economic development
tactics (see
http://cpds.apana.org.au/Documents/Defects_ETSO/Defects_in_Economic_Tact
ics.htm)
-------------------------------
-------------------------------
(6) some folks believe that Israel is a client state of the US
There are still some folks who believe that Israel is a client state of
the US and that the humiliation t of every US president since Johnson at
the hands of whoever happens to be Israel's Prime Minister is just an
act. While America stands astride the planet as the world's only
superpower, Israel, now in the person of Sharon, sits on its shoulders,
giving orders re the Middle East. That 50 members of the US Congress are
about to go to Israel on a trip led by AIPAC may give those willing to
go beyond the "conventional wisdom" concerning the US-Israel
relationship, some idea of where the source of Israel's power
originates.
Jeff B

[Everyman]

Calling all microbiologists! 2 deaths, 14 serious (requiring ventilators to
stay alive); 100
cases among troops in Iraq
http://tinyurl.com/ityy
http://www.islamonline.net/English/News/2003-08/03/article01.shtml

911 Report-The Saudi Ties are U.S. ties
http://news.globalfreepress.com/article.pl?sid=03/07/30/229223


Mossad posing as "Palestinian Terrorists"
http://users.cyberone.com.au/myers/vanunu.html


Now We Pay the Warlords to Tyrannise the Afghan People
http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1009416,00.html


The "Planted" Pentagon Debris -fights among 9/11 Skeptics continue
http://news.globalfreepress.com/article.pl?sid=03/08/02/2333220


US Homelessness and Poverty Rates Skyrocket While Billions are Spent
Overseas on Occupation
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article4305.htm



Anti-globalization leader Ayman al-Zawahri warned the United States on
Sunday it would pay a high price if it harmed any of the detainees at the
U.S. base at Guantanamo Bay
http://tinyurl.com/ivyj


Their Master's Voice -- Every intelligence chief has a political boss
http://www.gush-shalom.org/archives/article260.html

"Regime Changes" -- How US infiltrates "civil society" to overthrow
governments -- [What is a CIA agent but a government informant, assassin,
agitator, theif and saboteur, organized crime figure, prostitute with a
government pension plan and James Bond license to commit crime? --DE]
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article4332.htm


Q: What do you call people (citizen or foreigner)your government imprisons,
denies of all national and international legal, consititutional, charter and
convention protections; and kills kills after a trial by
Wolfowitz-appointed non-peers despite the fact that there is no evidence?
a) Enemy combatant detainees (a term including merely "suspected"
and "potential")
b) "Guantanamo meat"
c) British Subjects (Whithall officials say Bush told by UK during
Blair visit that UK does NOT want its detainees returned for
trial under British law hard to mount a successful prosecution
in Britain because of the difficulty in obtaining evidence that is
admissible in court and because it would force disclosure of the
state of British intelligence.
http://tinyurl.com/ivvw

Who are you calling evil?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1011038,00.html

UK zionist-globalization government creating their own version of US
"Christian Right" for "moral cover"
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/blair/story/0,11964,1011478,00.html

Got oil? Israel behind accusations of financing and supporting terrorism
leveled at Saudi Arabia
http://www.islamonline.net/English/News/2003-08/02/article09.shtml


Stray bullet kills US soldier in Iraq
http://www.theadvertiser.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5936,6851381%255E25
777,00.html


Saddam 'betrayed by friends'
http://www.theadvertiser.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5936,6850844%255E25
777,00.html

Britons unconvinced on Iraq: Blair
http://www.theadvertiser.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5936,6840095%255E25
777,00.html

US troops miss Saddam
http://www.theadvertiser.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5936,6823687%255E25
777,00.html


Bait and Switch: The Neocon Case for War in Iraq
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/080303F.shtml


"Shallow Throat" Advises Democrats to Bring It On Big-Time
http://www.crisispapers.org/Editorials/bring-it-on.htm


China is modifying short-range mobile missiles to target American forces in
Okinawa and is sharply increasing the number of missiles aimed at Taiwan
http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/181_326132,00050001.htm


The Prisoner of Ramallah -- He is the most admired and beloved leader of his
own people, and apparently the leader most admired by the masses throughout
the Arab and Muslim world. Not bad for a person who is turning 74.
http://www.avnery-news.co.il/english/

Israeli army confiscates three hectares in Gaza Strip
http://tinyurl.com/ivyo

Liberia
http://www.sundayherald.com/35721
http://www.sundayherald.com/35731

"We did not invite you here - and we are not in your country."
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/fisk/

Bush renews for one year the "national emergency" suspension of national and
international law protections (elections, free political speech, free
political participation, freedom of press, freedom of assembly etc) ue to
the continuing threat of terrorism in Iraq. Former President George Bush
first imposed sanctions on Iraq on August 2, 1990. See: CONTINUATION OF THE
NATIONAL EMERGENCY WITH RESPECT TO IRAQ -- Distributed by the Bureau of
International Information Programs, U.S.
Department of State. Web site: http://usinfo.state.gov)
uly&x=20030731181136namfuaks0.694668&t=usinfo/wf-latest.html

Wall makes Palestinian farmers refugees on their own land
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/story.jsp?story=429797


China Readying for Blitzkrieg on Korean Peninsula
http://english.pravda.ru/author/_79.htmld


John Pilger | War on Truth
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/080303G.shtml


Rumsfeld's Polish Mercenaries Come Under Fire in Iraq
http://tinyurl.com/isdn


Saddam Hussein's daughters, in interviews Friday, expressed deep affection
for their father but said they don't know where he is and last saw him a
week before the Iraq war started.
http://tinyurl.com/isbf

Bush's High Crimes Against the Nation
http://disc.server.com/discussion.cgi?id=149495;article=42826;title=APFN

Organized Crime in the Administration did 9-11 (34 photo articles)
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/9-11-demonstrative-evidence-of-frameup/


Norman Solomon | U.S. Media Are Too Soft on the White House
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/080303H.shtml


Saboteurs blew up part of a key oil pipeline
http://sg.news.yahoo.com/030801/1/3d295.html


Ali Ismaeel Abbas, an 11-year-old who lost his arms in a Baghdad bomb
attack. ...Nakhoul, for her part, had resolved to try to persuade the
International Red Cross to help Ali, but then her own tragedy struck: on
April 8 she was badly injured when an American missile was fired at the
Palestine Hotel, an attack in which three journalists, including one of her
Reuters colleagues, were killed. With a piece of shrapnel embedded in her
brain, Nakhoul was evacuated to Kuwait. ...
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1010170,00.html

Walter Williams | Bush's High Crimes Against the Nation
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/080303I.shtml

The Bush Administration's Top 40 Lies About War and Terrorism
http://disc.server.com/discussion.cgi?id=149495;article=42825;title=APFN


Mel Gibson's Christ Movie, Offensive to Zionists, Isn't that Bad
http://www.newsmaxstore.com/nms/showdetl.cfm?&DID=6&Product_ID=1419


Senator Clinton Says Supreme Court Still Merits Mistrust
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/080303J.shtml

Uh, no, Dick(head). You do not create reality by writing it. I'm here to
expose lying sacks of shit like you, the guy who used to post that the
government is controlling the weather and thereby manipulating the

markets.

The weather is being affected by secret weather modification.

I have never stated that the government is doing the modifying -- it could
be corporations, and NGO or an international body.

Weather modification exists certainly. Israel gets 22 percent of its
rainfall from weather modification, but they do so quietly, because those
parcels of wet air must be diverted from going someplace else.

You talk as if it is insane to think that weather modification is possible.
You talk as if it is insane that governments would want to control it. You
talk as if it is insane to say that diverting heat, cold, moisture, dryness
from one region or country to another is not frought will overwhelming
political and liability issues? You talk as it it is insane to suggest that
secrecy would be resorted to to skirt those political and liability issues.
You talk as if it insane to think that once secret weather modification was
underway that was unaccountable to anyone by power-elite figures behind
closed doors that it would not be used to affect economic events in
agriculture, in futures markets, in dervivatives, in disaster funding, in
"national emergency" politics, in geopolitical conflicts, and in "regime
change."

That's it, Dick. People need to know that, so that they might properly
judge the crap that you post.

And in doing so you display such a degree of inhumanity to people you
do not know, people simply seeking the truth out of concern for the
good of people

Oh, fuck off, Dick. You slander people all the time in your piece-of-shit
posts. Seeking truth?
You haven't posted a truthful thing in all the time I've seen your work.
Y2K was going to result in food riots, according to you. Remember?

I spoke for preparedness in case the predictions, which no average citizen
was in a position to evaluate -- I also feared that the US was the target
of some kind of operation built around the scare -- no one knew what was
happening -- I was worried about Y2K which I did not understand. ANd of
course I was the only one worried about Y2K and I started the scares right?
Wrong! I was only posting to a few groups back then and was specializing in
the CHina threat and clandestine weathermodification. I had rice, 4 new
plastic garbage cans filled with water, candles, propane camp stove, extra
toilet paper -- and I will tell you that under Clinton I had no trust that I
was getting the straight truth -- in short: I would do and say the same
thing again in a similar situation today.

However, with the Pentagon attack, I have had time to investigate and I have
found the problem much more tractable than second-guessing the weaknesses of
the country's cyber infrastructure on December 31, 1999.

Did I really have to answer Arizona retired Cowboy's accusation about my
response to the unknowns, to the non-verifyable warnings by assorted experts
who were filling the media of that day? I think readers will cut me some
slack for having shared my speculative thoughts about possible dangers to
prepare for in a dangerous situation where we did not know what was really
going on or what would happen. All I said about enemies exploiting or
possibly the collapse of the infrastructure being perhaps a deliberatly
planned time bomb to make us vulnerable was not unreasonable to be thinking
about (testing, exploring the possibility) given what little we knew at the
time and what all dire possibilities that "experts" were discussing around
us.

See how KC has -- by his accusations -- gotten us away from

THE BUSINESS AT HAND:



Organized Crime in the Administration did 9-11 (34 photo articles)
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/9-11-demonstrative-evidence-of-frameup/


Proof that the Defense Department attacked their own Headquarters on
9-11-01
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pentagon911/message/1
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pentagon911/message/2
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pentagon911/message/3

What convinced me 9-11 was a frameup
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/77_deastman1.htm
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/77_deastman2.htm
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/77_deastman3.htm
Leading investigators of the 9-11 mass-murder inside-job black op
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/ericbart/index.html
http://www.freedomfiles.org/war
http://www.freedomfiles.org/war/pentagon.htm
http://www.911dossier.co.uk/

More on the 9-11 frameup:
http://earth-citizens.net
http://www.ifrance.fr/silentbutdeadly/
http://www.the-movement.com/Hijackers/Agents.htm
http://www.communitycurrency.org/pi.html

[Everyman]

Contents:

US soldiers doing zionism 'Red Dawn' against Iraqi Bravehearts are now
inflicted with second deadly disease -- two die from sudden organ failure
virus amid spike in pneumonia cases

Career officer does eye-opening stint inside Pentagon


NeoConservatism - Where Trotsky Meets Stalin & Hitler


========================

US soldiers doing zionism 'Red Dawn' against Iraqi Bravehearts are now
inflicted with second deadly disease -- two die from sudden organ failure
virus amid spike in pneumonia cases

----------

THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
updated: 07/28/2003 11:29 PM
St Louis Dispatch
http://tinyurl.com/ilvs
SPRINGFIELD, Mo. - Epidemiologists are investigating two unusual deaths from
illness among troops in the Middle East to see whether they are related to
10 cases of severe pneumonia, The Springfield News Leader reported.

A Missourian, Spc. Joshua Neusche, 20, of Montreal, Mo., died of an illness
July 12. His parents said the disease caused various organs to break down.

Two researchers have already been sent to the Landstuhl Regional Medical
Center in Germany, where Neusche was treated before his death.

The U.S. Army surgeon general's office told The News Leader an additional
team of six researchers is preparing to fly to Iraq to investigate.

The cases under investigation have occurred since March 1. Another soldier
whose name wasn't released died about a month before Neusche, on June 17.

Col. Robert DeFraites, the surgeon general's senior preventative-medicine
physician, said officials have not yet been able to identify a specific
bacterium or virus that could have caused such severe cases of pneumonia.

"It's not entirely unheard of for this to happen," said DeFraites. He said
that in the past five years, 17 soldiers have died of acute respiratory
distress syndrome.

However, he said it is uncommon for pneumonia to cause a breakdown in organs
other than the lungs.

Neusche's parents said that's what happened to their son. Mark and Cynthia
Neusche said they were told their son's kidneys, liver and muscles began to
deteriorate after he contracted the illness.

"The doctor said (Josh) got into some type of toxin that began degenerating
his muscles," Mark Neusche said Friday.

The investigation comes at a time of overall concern about pneumonia.
DeFraites said there has been a noticeable increase in pneumonia cases among
soldiers since the war in Iraq began. He didn't release specific numbers but
said the incidence of pneumonia is exceeding military expectations of 10 to
20 cases among deployed soldiers each month. Most of the patients have
served in Kuwait and Iraq.

Besides bacteria and viruses, he said, pneumonia also can be brought on by
fungus, parasites and noninfectious causes such as exposure to metal dust.

DeFraites said preliminary tests show the illness is not passed from person
to person and is not related to severe acute respiratory syndrome, or SARS.

During the investigation, the teams of epidemiologists will study everything
from the soldiers' medical records and tissue samples to soil, water and air
samples.

DeFraites said infectious agents such as anthrax and smallpox also will be
investigated.

"Nothing's going to be ruled out," DeFraites said. "When you go into one of
these things, you keep an open mind. ... There's enough concern about these
two fatal cases (occurring) in such a short period of time" to warrant the
investigation.

Montreal, Mo., is just south of Camdenton, near the Lake of the Ozarks.

============================

http://www.ohio.com/mld/beaconjournal/6424570.htm

Career officer does eye-opening stint inside Pentagon
By Karen Kwiatkowski, a recently retired Air Force Lieutenant colonel.

After eight years of Bill Clinton, many military officers breathed a sigh of
relief when George W. Bush was named president. I was in that plurality. At
one time, I would have believed the administration's accusations of
anti-Americanism against anyone who questioned the integrity and good faith
of President Bush, Vice President Cheney or Defense Secretary Donald
Rumsfeld.

However, while working from May 2002 through February 2003 in the office of
the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, Near East South Asia and Special
Plans (USDP/NESA and SP) in the Pentagon, I observed the environment in
which decisions about post-war Iraq were made.

Those observations changed everything.

What I saw was aberrant, pervasive and contrary to good order and
discipline. If one is seeking the answers to why peculiar bits of
``intelligence'' found sanctity in a presidential speech, or why the
post-Hussein occupation has been distinguished by confusion and false steps,
one need look no further than the process inside the Office of the Secretary
of Defense. I can identify three prevailing themes.

. Functional isolation of the professional corps. Civil service and
active-duty military professionals assigned to the USDP/NESA and SP were
noticeably uninvolved in key areas of interest to Undersecretary for Policy
Douglas Feith, Deputy Secretary Paul Wolfowitz and Rumsfeld. These included
Israel, Iraq and to a lesser extent, Saudi Arabia.

When the New York Times broke the story last summer of Richard Perle's
invitation of Laurent Muraviec to brief the Defense Policy Board on Saudi
Arabia as the next enemy of the United States, this briefing was news to the
Saudi desk officer. He even had some difficulty getting a copy of it, while
receiving assignments related to it.

In terms of Israel and Iraq, all primary staff work was conducted by
political appointees, in the case of Israel a desk officer appointee from
the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, and in the case of Iraq, Abe
Shulsky and several other appointees. These personnel may be exceptionally
qualified; Shulsky authored a 1993 textbook Silent Warfare: Understanding
the World of Intelligence.

But the human resource depth made possible through broad-based teamwork with
the professional policy and intelligence corps was never established, and
apparently, never wanted by the Bush-Cheney-Rumsfeld organization.

. Cross-agency cliques: Much has been written about the role of the founding
members of the Project for a New American Century, the Center for Security
Policy and the American Enterprise Institute and their new positions in the
Bush administration. Certainly, appointees sharing particular viewpoints are
expected to congregate, and an overwhelming number of these appointees
having such organizational ties is neither conspiratorial nor unusual. What
is unusual is the way this network operates solely with its membership
across the various agencies -- in particular the State Department, the
National Security Council and the Office of the Vice President.

Within the Central Intelligence Agency, it was less clear to me who the
appointees were, if any. This might explain the level of interest in the CIA
taken by the Office of the Vice President. In any case, I personally
witnessed several cases of staff officers being told not to contact their
counterparts at State or the National Security Council because that
particular decision would be processed through a different channel. This
cliquishness is cause for amusement in such movies as Never Been Kissed or
The Hot Chick. In the development and implementation of war planning it is
neither amusing nor beneficial for American security because opposing points
of view and information that doesn't ``fit'' aren't considered.

. Groupthink. Defined as ``reasoning or decision-making by a group, often
characterized by uncritical acceptance or conformity to prevailing points of
view,'' groupthink was, and probably remains, the predominant characteristic
of Pentagon Middle East policy development. The result of groupthink is the
elevation of opinion into a kind of accepted ``fact,'' and uncritical
acceptance of extremely narrow and isolated points of view.

The result of groupthink has been extensively studied in the history of
American foreign policy, and it will have a prominent role when the history
of the Bush administration is written. Groupthink, in this most recent case
leading to the invasion and occupation of Iraq, will be found, I believe, to
have caused a subversion of constitutional limits on executive power and a
co-optation through deceit of a large segment of the Congress.

I am now retired. Shortly before my retirement I was allowed to return to my
primary office of assignment, having served in NESA as a desk officer
backfill for 10 months. The transfer was something I had sought, but my wish
was granted only after I made a particular comment to my superior, in
response to my reading of a February Secretary of State cable answering a
long list of questions from a Middle Eastern country regarding U.S. planning
for the aftermath in Iraq. The answers had been heavily crafted by the
Pentagon, and to me, they were remarkably inadequate, given the late stage
of the game. I suggested to my boss that if this was as good as it got, some
folks on the Pentagon's E-ring may be sitting beside Hussein in the war
crimes tribunals.

Hussein is not yet sitting before a war crimes tribunal. Nor have the key
decision-makers in the Pentagon been forced to account for the odd set of
circumstances that placed us as a long-term occupying force in the world's
nastiest rat's nest, without a nation-building plan, without significant
international support and without an exit plan. Neither may ever be required
to answer their accusers, thanks to this administration's military as well
as publicity machine, and the disgraceful political compromises already made
by most of the Congress. Ironically, only Saddam Hussein, buried under tons
of rubble or in hiding, has a good excuse.


=====================================


NeoConservatism - Where
Trotsky Meets Stalin & Hitler
By Srdja Trifkovic
Chronicles Magazine
8-3-3



The neoconservatives are often depicted as former Trotskyites who have
morphed into a new, closely related life form. It is pointed out that many
early neocons -- including The Public Interest founder Irving Kristol and
coeditor Nathan Glazer, Sidney Hook, and Albert Wohlstetter -- belonged to
the anti-Stalinist far left in the late 1930s and early 1940s, and that
their successors, including Joshua Muravchik, and Carl Gershman, came to
neoconservatism through the Socialist Party at a time when it was Trotskyite
in outlook and politics. As early as 1963 Richard Hofstadter commented on
the progression of many ex-Communists from the paranoid left to the paranoid
right, clinging all the while to the fundamentally Manichean psychology that
underlies both. Four decades later the dominant strain of neoconservatism is
declared to be a mixture of geopolitical militarism and "inverted socialist
internationalism."

Blanket depictions of neoconservatives as redesigned Trotskyites need to be
corrected in favor of a more nuanced analysis. In several important respects
the neoconservative world outlook has diverged from the Trotskyite one and
acquired some striking similarities with Stalinism and German National
Socialism. Today's neoconservatives share with Stalin and Hitler an ideology
of nationalist socialism and internationalist imperialism. The similarities
deserve closer scrutiny and may contribute to a better understanding of the
most influential group in the U.S. foreign policy-making community.


Certain important differences remain, notably the neoconservatives'
hostility not only to Nazi race-theory but even to the most benign
understanding of national or ethnic coherence. On the surface, there are
also glaring differences in economics. However, the neoconservative
glorification of the free market is more rhetoric, designed to placate the
businessmen who fund them, than reality. In fact, the neoconservatives favor
not free enterprise but a kind of state capitalism -- within the context of
the global apparatus of the World Bank and the IMF -- that Hitler would have
appreciated.


Some form of gradual but irreversible and desirable withering away of the
state is a key tenet of the Trotskyite theoretical outlook. The
neoconservatives, by contrast, are statists par excellence. Their core
belief -- that society can be managed by the state in both its political and
economic life -- is equally at odds with the traditional conservative
outlook and with the non-Stalinist Left. In this important respect the
neoconservatives are much closer to Stalinism and National Socialism.


They do not want to abolish the state; they want to control it -- especially
if the state they control is capable of controlling all others. They are not
"patriotic" in any conventional sense of the term and do not identify
themselves with the real and historic America but see the United States
merely as the host organism for the exercise of their Will to Power. Whereas
the American political tradition has been fixated on the dangers of
centralized state power, on the desirability of limited government and
non-intervention in foreign affairs, the neoconservatives exalt and worship
state power, and want America to become a hyper-state in order to be an
effective global hegemon. Even when they support local government it is on
the grounds that it is more efficient and responsive to the demands of the
Empire, not on Constitutional grounds.


The neoconservative view of America as a hybrid, "imagined" nation had an
ardent supporter eight decades ago: in Mein Kampf Adolf Hitler argued for a
new, tightly centralized Germany by invoking the example of the United
States and the triumph of the Union over states' rights.


He concluded that "National Socialism, as a matter of principle, must lay
claim to the right to force its principles on the whole German nation
without consideration of previous federated state boundaries."

Hitler was going to make a new Germany the way he imagined it, or else
destroy it. In the same vein the Weekly Standard writers are "patriots" only
insofar as the America they imagine is a pliable tool of their global
design. Their relentless pursuit of an American Empire overseas is coupled
by their deliberate domestic transformation of the United States' federal
government into a Leviathan unbound by constitutional restraints. The lines
they inserted into President Bush's State of the Union address last January
aptly summarized their Messianic obsessions: the call of history has come to
the right country, we exercise power without conquest, and sacrifice for the
liberty of strangers, we know that freedom is the right of every person and
the future of every nation: "The liberty we prize is not America's gift to
the world, it is God's gift to humanity."

Such megalomania is light years away from a patriotic appreciation of one's
nation. A psychotic quest for power and dominance is the driving force, and
the "nationalist" discourse its justification. The reality is visible in
ultimate distress: Towards the end of the Second World War Josef Goebbels
welcomed the Allied bombing for its destruction of the old bourgeois
cuckoo-clock and marzipan Germany of the feudal principalities. Driven by
the same impulse, Bill Kristol's "national greatness" psychosis seeks to
sweep away the old localized, decentralized America of bingo parlors and
little league games.


Most heirs of the Trotskyite Left are internationalists and one-world
globalists, whereas all neoconservatives are unabashed imperialists.


The former advocate "multilateralism," in the form of an emerging
"international community" controlled by the United Nations or through a
gradual transfer of sovereign prerogatives to regional groupings exemplified
by the European Union. By contrast the neoconservative urge for uninhibited
physical control of other lands and peoples bears resemblance to the New
European Order of six decades ago, or to the "Socialist Community" that
succeeded it in Eastern Europe. Even when they demand wars to export
democracy, the term "democracy" is used as an ideological concept. It does
not signify broad participation of informed citizens in the business of
governance, but it denotes the desirable social and political content of
ostensibly popular decisions. The process likely to produce undesirable
outcomes --an Islamic government in Iraq, say -- is a priori "undemocratic."
Whereas the Trotskyite Left is predominantly anti-militarist, the
neoconservatives are enthusiastically militarist in a manner reminiscent of
German and Soviet totalitarianism. Their strategic doctrine, promulgated
into official policy last September, calls for an indefinite and massive
military build-up unconnected to any identifiable military threat to the
United States. Their scribes demand 'citizen involvement,' in effect,
militarization of the populace, but the traditional 'citizen soldier'
concept is reversed.


Their goal is to get suitably indoctrinated young Americans to go and risk
their lives not for the honor and security of their own country, but for the
missions that have to be misrepresented to the public (e.g. the non-existant
Iraqi WMDs) in order to be made politically acceptable. As Gary North has
pointed out, neoconservative foreign policy is guns before butter: "Butter
always follows guns, but this is regarded as the inescapable price of
American regional presence abroad." The neoconservatives' deep-seated
distaste for the traditional societies, regimes, and religion of the
European continent, particularly Russia and East European Slavs, is
positively Hitlerian.


The sentiment was most glaringly manifested in the 1999 NATO war against the
Serbs: William Kristol's urge to vicariously "crush Serb skulls" went way
beyond the 1914 Viennese slogan "Serbien muss sterbien." In terms of
strategic significance for the United States, however, the neocons' visceral
Russophobia is mush more significant.

In the aftermath of the Cold War the neoconservatives have continued to
regard Moscow as the enemy, enthusiastically supporting Chechen separatists
as "freedom fighters" and advocating NATO expansion. Their atavism is
comparable to Hitler's obsession with Russia, an animosity that was equally
unrelated to the nature of its regime. It is only a matter of time before
some neocons start advocating a new Drang nach Osten, in the form of an
American-led scramble for Siberia.


The neoconservative mindset is apocalyptic (which is a Nazi and Stalinist
trait), rather than utopian (which characterizes the Trotskyite Left). The
replacement of the Soviet threat with the more amorphous "terrorism"
reflects the doomsday revolutionary mentality that can never rest. New
missions and new wars will have to be engineered, and pretexts manufactured,
with the same subtlety that characterized the "attack" on the German radio
station at Gleiwitz on August 31, 1939. Even the tools for the enforcement
of domestic acquiescence are not dissimilar: the Patriot Act followed 9-11
as smoothly as the suspension of the Weimar constitution followed the
Reichstag fire. Echoing the revolutionary dynamism and the historicist
Messianism equally common to fascists and communists, Michael Ledeen wrote
that "creative destruction" is America's eternal mission, both at home and
abroad, and the reason America's "enemies" hate it: "They cannot feel secure
so long as we are there, for our very existence -- our existence, not our
politics -- threatens their legitimacy. They must attack us in order to
survive, just as we must destroy them to advance our historic mission." The
neoconservatives' mendacity apparent in the misrepresentation of the Iraqi
crisis to the American people recalls the Goebbelsian "hypodermic needle
approach" to communication, in which the communicator's objective was to
"inject" his ideas into the minds of the target population. "Why, of course,
the people don't want war," Goering said when it was all over, in his prison
cell in Nuremberg in 1946:

"Why would some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the
best that he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece?
But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy
and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a
democracy or a fascist dictatorship or a communist dictatorship ... That is
easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce
the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It
works the same way in any country."

It does indeed. Goering's observation is echoed in our time by the
Straussian dictum that perpetual deception of the citizens by those in power
is necessary because they need to be led, and they need to be told what is
good for them. On this, at least, Trotsky, Stalin, and Hitler would all
agree. (As Hitler had said, "The receptive powers of the masses are very
restricted, and their understanding is feeble.") In the
Straussian-neoconservative mindset, those who are fit to rule are those who
realize there is no morality and that there is only one natural right, the
right of the superior to rule over the inferior.


That mindset is America's enemy. It is the greatest threat to the
constitutional order, identity, and way of life of the United States, in
existence today. Its adherents have only modified the paradigm of
dialectical materialism in order to continue pursuing the same
eschatological dream, the End of History devoid of God. They are in pursuit
of Power for its own sake -- thus sinning against God and man -- and the end
of that insane quest will be the same as the end of the Soviet empire and of
the Thousand-Year Reich.

http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/News/Trifkovic/NewsST072303.html

[Everyman]

Ressurrected Mahdi, as fortold, gathers braveheart Shia faithful to purge
their land of Zionist Imperial Your-Tax-Dollars-and-Children Stormtroopers
murdering innocent people under orders of Darth "Chinese" Wolfowitz



Can you say Praise Allah! No? Then can you at least say Bring our children
home and bring down these mass-murdering mother's-child-mutilating 9-11
perpetrating zionist false-christianity-from-hell psychomaniacs now leading
the US into penury, despotism, dishonor and destruction?

End the treason that has made us satan on earth.

==================

[List of new news articles and the URLs follows this story

==================]


Iraqis flock to Mahdi's Shia army
(Filed: 06/08/2003)
http://tinyurl.com/j59h

A militia of mostly Shia men is growing in response to a call to arms made
by a maverick young cleric. Harry de Quetteville in Baghdad reports on
Muqtader al-Sadr's army against US occupation.

As evening falls in the poor Shia suburb of Baghdad once known as Saddam
City, dozens of volunteers queue under the watchful gaze of a local imam to
sign up for the army.

But this is not the new Iraqi army sponsored and approved by the
American-led administration. These soldiers will receive no monthly salary
of £40. Here, prospective warriors are ready to serve, and die, for nothing.

This is "Mahdi's army", a growing militia of mostly Shia men who have
responded to the fiery call to arms made by a maverick young cleric,
Muqtader al-Sadr, two weeks ago in the Shia holy city of Najaf.

Since then al-Sadr has led anti-US demonstrations and encouraged worshippers
to resist the US "invaders" and Iraq's "Zionist" governing council,
appointed by the coalition.

Now the ranks of this religious army, named after an ancient imam who Shias
believe will return to save the world, have swollen into tens of thousands,
perhaps more.

"On the very first day after the call, up to 1 million people signed,"
claimed Sheikh Hassan al-Zurgani, a Baghdad representative of the Hawza, a
Shia seminary based in Najaf.

"The official Iraqi army is the puppet of the USA," he added. "Now our
people are willing to be martyrs and the USA must fear us."

For the moment Muqtader al-Sadr, the son of a revered Shia ayatollah
murdered four years ago by Saddam Hussein, has not issued any order for
mobilisation against the United States.

But there is no doubt that Mahdi's army has the potential to be a heavily
armed force. "We do not need to issue weapons," said Sheikh Qais
al-Kaza'ali, who oversees Baghdad's main rallying point for signatures from
a religious centre in Saddam City. "Everybody has their own gun."

The US administration has dismissed al-Sadr and his Mahdi army as nothing
more than a nuisance. But on the rundown streets of Saddam City, Shia who
were despised and oppressed by the former regime believe they have found a
new oppressor.

From their crumbling concrete tenements, they have come in droves to Sheikh

al-Kaza'ali's office every night between 6 and 8 pm since al-Sadr's Najaf
sermon.

"We are not scared of the Americans," said Ali Hadi, a 13-year-old boy who
signed up yesterday evening. "Iraq is our country and we must fight to
protect it and our religion."

Everyone in this district of Baghdad claims to have signed up for the army,
encouraged by their friends and by community leaders.

"My friends told me about this 10 days ago," said Salah Hassan. "They have
all signed, so I came down this evening to sign up too."

The process of volunteering is simple. A signature on a neatly printed form
is enough to commit a volunteer to service.

As pen is repeatedly put to paper outside his office, Sheikh al-Kaza'ali
insisted that it did amount to a real army.

"Most of the former Iraqi army were Shias," he said. "They have enormous
experience of battle. And we are already sorting the names we have into army
divisions. This is not a symbolic army. You would be astonished how ready
people are to die.

"One man came with his five-year-old son to put both their names on the list
and we said that his son was too young. The man said, 'No, I am ready to
sacrifice him for this army'."

Such is the fervour boiling in this shabby neighbourhood that some may be
willing to carry out their boastful threats of self-sacrifice and take an
American life too.

But for the moment the only army patrolling the streets around what was once
called Saddam City is under the control of President George W Bush, not
Muqtader al-Sadr.

Even the Americans admit however, that this poor Shia district will never be
known again as Saddam City. Now it is known to one and all as Sadr City
instead.


------------

War is costing US citizens $1,000 per household -- that is, those
households that do not also have dead soldiers [ I wonder what the figure
for Syria, Iran, Saudi Arabia, North Korea and the American Midwest will add
to this?]
http://news.ft.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=FT.com/StoryFT/FullStory&c
=StoryFT&cid=1059478727995


The price of restoring Iraq's oil and gas industry is about 1.14 billion
dollars and rising amid sabotage and looting, according to a detailed,
official plan received Tuesday.
http://www.prolog.net/webnews/wed/be/Qus-iraq-oil.Rqh2_Da5.html



Dollar May Fall; Economic Growth may Be Limited by Job Losses
http://quote.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000101&sid=aliOsvAEGgoo&refer=jap
an





Israel detains 47 protesters at West Bank barrier
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/08/05/1060064182996.html



Human rights abuses in Afghanistan are being committed by gunmen and
warlords who were propelled into power by the United States and its
coalition partners after the Taliban fell in 2001.



It's a land gripped by warlords, with terror, rape and
murder rife . but you wouldn't know it from Kabul's
new decadence.
http://www.sundayherald.com/35712

"Democracy Is Under Attack - Let's Take it Back" A Speech by the Honorable
Cynthia McKinney
http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/080503_take_it_back.html


Muslim Scholar Refutes Newsweek Qur'an Article stating that the original
language of the Qur'an was not Arabic but "something closer to Aramaic."
http://www.islam-online.net/English/News/2003-08/05/article03.shtml


105 Latvian soldiers headed for Iraq to bolster Rumsfeld's Polish
firght-for-us-or-we-call-in-our-loans=and-bankrupt-your-country mercenary
forces
http://www.ptd.net/webnews/wed/ao/Qiraq-latvia.RVeU_Da5.html


Top Federal Reserve Historian Re: G. Edward Griffin on American Radio
Saturday, 8/09/03 American Radio
http://www.americanradioshow.us
About G. Edward Griffin
http://www.vitaminb17.org/ed_griffin.htm




"At sunset, when all the people had gone, the soldiers came back and took
the two flags off the graves of Saddam's sons. Then they stayed on to watch
anyone who came here afterwards.
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/fisk/


Collaborationist new "Murdoch" buying up all newspapers in southern
raq -- Headline: "Coalition Forces Celebrate the Security and Stability
of Southern Iraq" Robert Fisk meets the Murdoch of southern Iraq
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/fisk/



Muqtada al-Sadr, a charismatic 30-year-old cleric from the holy Shi'ite city
of Najaf, and who also comes from a powerful clerical dynasty. He is the son
of Grand Ayatollah Mohammad al-Sadr, who was killed in 1999 by agents
presumed to be working for Saddam.
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/EH06Ak02.html


Arab Group Won't Recognize Iraqi Council (Zionist Occupation figureheads)
http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,1280,-2991485,00.html


Officials confirm dropping firebombs on Iraqi troops Results are 'remarkably
similar' to using napalm
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/military/20030805-9999_1n5bomb.html


So, if there is nothing new in the information reported by Foreign Report,
why did the "Israeli sources" find it necessary just now to present
seemingly new, dangerous Syrian threats? Well, from the perspective of the
Israeli defense establishment there is a very good reason to magnify the
threat of the Syrian missiles.



U.S. Marks Hiroshima Anniversary By Holding Top Secret Summit to Discuss
Expanding Nation's Nuclear Arsenal
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=03/08/05/1455235

[Everyman]

Tell us what you really think?

Then can you at least say Bring our children home and bring
down these mass-murdering mother's-child-mutilating 9-11
perpetrating zionist false-christianity-from-hell psychomaniacs
now leading the US into penury, despotism, dishonor, debt
and destruction?

I always send out what I think as fast as it occurs to me. And having let
the idea fly in political speech, I never call back the arrows for editing,
proofing etc. (That is how you know I am honest -- no liar can be this
careless and this vociferous.)

BUT IT ISN'T WHAT WE THINK THAT COUNTS, IT IS WHAT WE PROPOSE BASED ON WHAT
WE HAVE THOUGHT AND WHAT WE KNOW:


I propose bringing down organized crime leadership by following up on
proof that 9-11 was a mass-murder frameup done by Administration Zionist
neo-con agents of Big (Defense) Business and Big (War Debt) Finance.

I propose new leadership hand picked by an emergency triumvatate of
political kingmakers backed by the masses, Buchanan, Nader, Harry
Browne -- who will select the candidate and write the platform and share
the
cabinet and (unavoidable) political spoils appointments -- in this
emergency.

I propose applying anti-trust to corporations, especially mass media.

I propose re-regulating international commerce so that goods and services
are traded but investment capital is not allowed to cross boarders

I propose that the Federal Reserve be nationalized and integrated with the
Treasury department

I propose that the US Senate be returned to being selected by members of the
respective state legislatures

I propose going back to the original constitutional design -- scrubbed when
political parties emerged (unanticipated by the framers) -- that people
not elect presidents at all, but that they vote for the smartest and most
honest and public-welfare minded persons among them to be the "electors"
who in turn are free to consider and select any persons for the Presideny
and to choose the two best they can find, with the number two choice
becoming Vice President -- the system worked, except that larceny in the
hearts of the original "establishment" did not want the system to work --
now electors are merely the automaton servitors of the "party" whose
"ticket" wins. MAN, THINK OF WHAT THIS CHANGE WOULD MEAN!!!!!!!

I propose that world debt be renegotiated on the understanding that
organized crime has been manipulating the system and that the trillions owed
to the world super rich is the result of a "rigged game" requiring immediate
restitution, ill-gotten debt be elimated in a manner that maximizes
decentralization of capital and control of capital

I propose the breakup of all corporations that operate in more than one
state -- that holding companies be outlawed -- that the incentive
structure be realigned to bring the speedy return of local small business.

That tariffs be introduced on goods and services that will erase the
advangtage of totalitarian slave states like Triad-Princeling-controlled
CHina -- so that the those willing and forced to be wage slaves over there
will no longer be competing directly against middle-class workers over here


That education be returned entirely to the states, encouraging them to
return control to the local school boards -- and the teachers unions be
broken up as a grotesque mockery of justice and regard for our nations youth


THat the US withdraw its military from every foreign nation

That the US join other nations of the world in declaring Zionism as racism
and organized white collar crime and mass-murder piracy

The modification of the international currency system eliminating the
insidious tools of finace capitalism like the World Bank and IMF which
operate to maximize the wealth of international currency speculators and
lenders, while ruining nations, ruining, espiecially, the middle classes of
the world for the benefit of the elite criminal classes.

And a Huey Long wealth redistribution that would be more interested in
Rockefellers and Morgans and Soros etc. than the
Henry-Ford-Edison-Bill-Gates non-speculation non-government privilege based
entrepreneurial-inventor-innovator-organizer-of-the-better-mousetrap-variety
. ANTI-TRUST MUST NOT BE USED, AS BI-PARTISANS HAVE USED IT (WHEN THEY USE
IT AT ALL), FOR CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION SHAKEDOWNS AND TO KNOWCK OUT THE
COMPETITIORS OF THEIR FRIENDS.

Also, the vast tracts of government lands, which are held as collateral by
the Rothschilds and other lenders on the national debt, will be taken back
by force (repudiation backed my public opinion and federal power) and
opened up to LaRouche-Buckminster-Fuller-Jeffersonian national development
that will empty out the slums of stagnant urban areas -- merely holding
pens for voters controlled by vice dangled on a stick by the billionaires
corrupt political machinery

Legalize drugs merely to undercut the economic engine of globalization

Break up Hollywood monopoly on movie production -- everyone wants to make
pictures and there is no reason why entertainment can't be a decentralized
product in the computer age.

Having ended the export of industrial/investment capital, we must create
incentives for a new generation of cheap and versatile machines -- that
can make parts for any purpose -- so that people can design products on
their computers, look up the specialty producers on the net, and start
production as soon as they convince people, also on the net, to bankroll the
proto-type or first run etc.

Also, do everything to make paper and printing presses cheap and
plentiful -- never allowing a corrupt political union to close down
newspapers again -- making news once more answerable to the public
demand for information and not the deviant corporation and government
elite's demand for mass-mind control. Decentralization is the key.

This is sure fun. I wish more would play at this with me.

Dick Eastman
Yakima

[Everyman]

Corrupt US courts awarding upper crust WTC victim's family tens of millions
each with Iraqi's money -- which buys their shut mouths over the 9-11
black -ops mass-murder frameup.



Here is how it works:


Judge rules: Iraqis will pay $104 million to family of senior managing
director and partner of WTC firm Cantor Fitzgerald and another. (see below)
Deviant ruling elite may have had to have killed daddy for effect, but they
know how to make it up to you if you were born right.

Yes, the ruling-class judge knew all about Iraqi involvement in al Qe-ada,
even if no one else does -- and so this rich family, already flush with
life insurance cash, gets further settlement on the backs of the poor
Iraqis.

See we've got legal protection made to order, if you have the lawyer and
the connections.

I guess this means that the real (and proven) perpetrators (Rumsfeld,
Wolfowitz, Perle, Cheney, Rice etc. don't have to feel guilty about the
family of this rich victim family any more -- that is, if they ever did.)

Is America a great country or what?

Dick, they're out of control. They can do anything they please now.

A federal judge awarded nearly US$104m in damages to the families of two
victims of 9/11.
The cases were brought by the estate of George Eric Smith, a senior business
analyst for SunGard Asset Management and Timothy Soulas, a senior managing
director and partner at Cantor Fitzgerald Securities.

The plaintiffs had provided some evidence that Iraq provided support to
Osama bin Laden and al-Qaida.

James Easley, the lawyer who brought the case said it was unclear how much
in frozen Iraqi and al-Qaida assets could be available to satisfy the
judgement.

Obviously James Easley should have been asked to provide the dossier to
support Bush's war in Iraq. Did anyone ask him? On the otherhand the amount
of evidence required in the US court when the elite are plaintiffs may only
need to be circumstantial. It might even have been the meeting in Prague
between Atta and an Iraqi intelligence officer. Since the administration
doesn't take much notice of what the CIA tell them about Iraq perhaps US
judges over looked their intelligence that said Atta was in the US when this
meeting took place. If there was a meeting that is with the Iraqi in
attendance.

I wonder how the judge split the proportions to be paid by Iraq and
al-Qaida. Was Iraqs support weighed up at 20%; 50% or 80%? How much will
al-Qaida have to pay? Of course they were found liable for 9/11 minutes
after the event. Presumably Mr Easley didn't have to submit much evidence
against them before the judge found them liable. I suspect that the legal
costs were reasonably small for a big shot US lawyer because the judge
couldn't have taken too long to reach his decision since the US
administration had done all the work for both him and the lawyer. Was the
court case ex parte? Who acted for the Respondents? Were Saudi Arabia a
respondent too (and found innocent)? Of course their guilt, if any has not
yet been revealed by the US administration.

===============



Related news:



CALLING COURT RELIANCE ON THE CONSTITUTION "PLAYING LONE RANGER" JUSTICE
RUTH GINSBERG DECLARES THE SUPREME COURT NOW UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAWS AND
LAWS OF OTHER NATIONS MORE TO BILLIONAIRES' AND THIS BELOVED JURIST'S
LIKING



(Ruling elite had to go there, in case the people tried to alter the laws to
unseat rule of organized crime. That's how it looks to me.)



Justice Ginsburg Says Supreme Court Is No Longer "lone-Ranger" in
Decision-Making
By Gina Holland Associated Press Writer
Published: Aug 2, 2003

WASHINGTON (AP) - The Supreme Court is looking beyond America's borders for
guidance in handling cases on issues like the death penalty and gay rights,
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said Saturday.
The justices referred to the findings of foreign courts this summer in their
own ruling that states may not punish gay couples for having sex.

And in 2002, the court said that executing mentally retarded people is
unconstitutionally cruel. That ruling noted that the practice was opposed
internationally.

"Our island or lone ranger mentality is beginning to change," Ginsburg said
during a speech to the American Constitution Society, a liberal lawyers
group holding its first convention.

Justices "are becoming more open to comparative and international law
perspectives," said Ginsburg, who has supported a more global view of
judicial decision making.

Ginsburg cited an international treaty in her vote in June to uphold the use
of race in college admissions.

The shift has angered some conservatives. Justice Antonin Scalia, in the gay
sex case, wrote with two colleagues that the court should not "impose
foreign moods, fads, or fashions on Americans."

David Rivkin Jr., a conservative Washington attorney, said foreign trends
can be helpful to legislators in setting policy, but not to judges in
interpreting the U.S. Constitution.

Last month, Ginsburg and Justices Sandra Day O'Connor and Stephen Breyer
discussed the death penalty and terrorism with French President Jacques
Chirac during a European tour. France outlawed the death penalty in 1981.
Ginsburg was one of five justices who attended a conference on the European
constitution.

Ginsburg said Saturday that the Internet is making decisions of courts in
other countries more readily available in America, and they should not be
ignored.

"While you are the American Constitution Society, your perspective on
constitutional law should encompass the world," she told the group of
judges, lawyers and students. "We are the losers if we do not both share our
experiences with and learn from others."

[Everyman]

LIE ABOUT DISCOVERED MASS-GRAVES OF SADDAM'S ALLEGED VICTIMS EXPOSED AS
UNFOUNDED

First this article takes you part of the way into the deceit:

First we see the "sexed-up story" (a British euphemism for "lie") of
WMD's, then the sexed-up story of Saddam links to al Qa'eda, and now the
icing on the cake, the stories of Saddam's "attrocities" have been sexed-up
too.

Mr. Blair has said at least three times - including once on the floor of the
House of Commons - that the United Nations is claiming that some 300,000
bodies lie in mass graves in Iraq, and that this alone justifies the US-UK
invasion. First, the figure does not come from the United Nations. But the
real source is a private non-governmental organisation in America called
Human Rights. Nor is it an official Red Cross figure: "We would not say
that there are 300,000 people missing in Iraq," ... Human Rights Watch
currently has just two staff in Iraq. ... The International Committee of
the Red Cross is the body which is responsible in international law for
establishing the names of people missing in conflict. It is not the role of
a private, unaccountable organisation like Human Rights
http://www.antiwar.com/rep/laughland18.html



But the author above is just being tractful and polite.

Visit the the Human Rights Watch site -- they call for safeguards on aerial
anti-drug programs (calling off the dogs interfering with
Bush-etc.-Columbia drug links) and I looked for their report on Saddam's
attrocities that every ADL heckler on the newsgroups has been shoving down
my throat -- only to find that in their article on the subject they give
their sources and damn me to hell if this little piddly shit is all they
have to back this claim that became the basis of Blair, Bush and other
assholes proclamations. Note especially the source of the claim of mass
graves with "at least 2,000 bodies" I have marked in red.


http://hrw.org/reports/2003/iraq0503/5.htm#_Toc41888361

IV. Discovery of the Mass Graves at al-Mahawil
For twelve years the fate and whereabouts of those who

"disappeared" in custody in 1991 remained unresolved.
Witnesses to the killings inside Iraq were afraid to speak
out, and human rights investigators were barred from Iraq.
Families of the "disappeared" also were too afraid to
search for their relatives. When they did ask questions,
Iraqi officials told them that their relatives remained alive
in detention or simply refused to provide information.

That all changed with the collapse of the Iraqi government
in early April 2003. Almost immediately, across Iraq,
people began to locate mass graves. The first mass grave
near al-Hilla in the village of Imam Bakr was discovered
on May 2, 2003, and contained the remains of between
forty and fifty victims of the 1991 crackdown.

Two much larger mass graves were discovered around
May 13 near the village of al-Mahawil, the site of a major
Iraqi military base where many of those arrested in 1991
had been detained. The first site, located in the clay pits
behind an abandoned brick factory on the main
Baghdad- al-Hilla highway, contained the bodies of
some six hundred victims, according to local (municipal
and religious) officials. A second site, located just a few
kilometers north in an open field in an agricultural area,
contained the bodies of at least two thousand people,
according to local officials.
http://hrw.org/reports/2003/iraq0503/5.htm#_Toc41888361

Did you notice? This is a third-hand rumor, no names, no names of
interviewers, no time it was said, no description of the conditions under
which the information was elicited, e.g., was it coercion and bribery or
fear or a possible political incentive?

And what of the subsequent efforts to verify these rumors? Human Rights
Watch has an article about that too. Read this:

Failure of the U.S. and Coalition Forces to Support Exhumations


The U.S. government soon became aware of the
possible existence of much larger mass graves in
the al-Hilla area. By May 7, intelligence information
gathered by the U.S. concluded that mass graves
containing perhaps tens of thousands of bodies
existed in the greater al-Hilla area. Despite this
information, the U.S. and coalition forces as of
this writing failed to come up with a strategy to
assist with the exhumations of the large mass graves

....
"When asked about the lack of forensic assistance
at the al-Mahawil mass grave site, Lt. Col. Rick Long
of the U.S. Marines explained to Human Rights Watch
that his orders were to classify mass graves as ones
relating to suspected war crimes-a category he
defined as crimes committed during international
hostilities or involving the executions of prisoners
of war-and ones involving suspected crimes against
the Iraqi people. If the mass grave was classified as
involving suspected war crimes, he explained, his
orders were to secure it. If the mass grave involved
suspected crimes against the Iraqi people, he was to
"assist" the local authorities.8

The U.S. Marines at the site-who, it must be noted,
do not have any forensic experience-provided water
and shelter for the local authorities, and brought in
some U.S. Marine counterintelligence officers to
interview witnesses and gather testimonial evidence.
With their limited resources, the U.S. forces on the
ground mobilized military photographers to videotape
and photograph the remains.
...
... U.S. and coalition forces have yet to define a
comprehensive strategy to assist with the exhumation
of mass graves in Iraq-in sharp contrast with the
international efforts made in the Balkans to assist with
the exhumation and identification of remains."



In other words, the Pentagon is not taking numbers, it is not doing the
forensic analysis on cause of death, but they are sending
"counterintelligence officers" to quote the local rumor, legend etc. -- as
if these "informants" saw the executions and saw the bodies (however many
and however they came to get there)being buried -- which is not likely.

One must ask why Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Hoon and Straw have bypassed a careful
verification, a count, a forensic demonstration of what happened etc. --
all earthshaking information which, if true and if substantiated, would
pull the Bush-Blair war coalition's nuts out of the fire?

They didn't because they knew they couldn't.

And so the rumor that someone told someone as filtered through Human Rights
Watch with two men in Iraq and picked up by Blair where suddenly it became
the UN and the Red Cross giving hard figures.

So why are these monsters, Bush and Blair, and the sociopathic masterminds
and moneymen behind them still in power?

What is wrong with the general public? You take in news like this and take
in some more the next day and more the next and the next and you never look
back on all you have taken in and come to a conclusion about who is a
mass-murderer and a horrendous liar and theif and you never start getting
together with each other to do something about it. Yes, Blair and Bush are
wrong to kill thousands and blame it on others so they can kill tens of
thousands more while grabbing the wealth of the Arab peoples and enslaving
them under zionist puppet rule -- but can you say that, given your response
as Americans and subjects of the UK that you deserve anything else?


--------------





Israeli government leaves Palestinian child detainees out of prisoner
release



Dysfunction: When the Bully Whines -- Whenever hard line Israelis and their
American apologists decide to discredit and discount Palestinian suffering
while exonerating the abuses and oppressive measures of the Israeli
occupation, the first charge levied against Palestinian spokespersons is
that of "whining." -- How often have Palestinians seen Israeli and
American officials alike sigh in obvious exasperation, roll their eyes in
sheer ennui, and indulge in an obvious stage whisper: "The Palestinians are
whining again."
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article4386.htm


Iraq authority requests bids on new AK-47s made in Poland and China
http://www.startribune.com/stories/484/4031409.html


Halliburton, the firm formerly run by American vice-president Dick Cheney,
swallows up more and more of the British army. The Ministry of Defence
(MoD) has confirmed that part-time soldiers hired by Halliburton may well
be driving British tanks in Iraq before the end of the year.
(This info from discredited 9-11 debunker Tom Hay and therefore
questionable -- although the story has the ring of truth.)



Military Warns Soldiers Against Public Criticism
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A31317-2003Aug7.html
(but they sure could get their absentee votes in to Florida in the 2000
election)


New, improved and more lethal: son of napalm
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/08/08/1060145828249.html



Cheney firm's rival, Bechtel, is forced to drop oil bid amid concerns that
the tender process
unfairly favours Halliburton and the growing disquiet over cronyism in
George Bush's administration was further stirred yesterday when it emerged
that a friend of the president who helped his election campaign had been
hired as the director of private development in Iraq. Thomas Foley, 51,
befriended Mr Bush when they attended Harvard. He will be in charge of 200
state-owned enterprises including mining, chemical, cement and tobacco
production, and report directly to the top US administrator in Iraq, Paul
Bremer.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1015229,00.html

We Used To Impeach Liars (6/3/03)
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/060303A.shtml



Americans don't give a damn what Iraqis say about their "liberation" and the
"100 days of peace" since President Bush declared the war over. "Many bad
things have happened, such as the looting. There is no electricity, the
security situation is unstable. If you compare them with Saddam Hussein, the
Americans have done nothing for us. They came to Iraq and said, 'We came to
protect you' but the only place they protected from the looters was the
Ministry of Oil." more
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/story.jsp?story=431945




More justice for Jewry -- Zundel gets what's coming to him for challenging
the Speilberg interpretation of holocaust history -- or is something else
going on here?
The purpose of the demonstration is to demand humane treatment for political
prisoner Ernst Zundel. He's kept in solitary confinement without a pillow, a
chair, pen, post-it notes, hardcover books or highlighters. His personal
toiletries are kept in a public hall outside his cell. The strip searches,
the denial of regular phone calls, sometimes the denial of the use of a
razor, all of these humiliations are efforts to break Ernst Zundel and to
punish him for his ideas. Perpetually stalled application for bail. --
Zundel, 64-year old publisher, pacifist and artist, convicted of nothing,
merely detained by a Canadian ruling class under the sway of fanatical,
vengeful Zionists had been stripped searched twice on Wednesday. Once, on
his way back from the trial. Why? Were the prison authorities worried that
Judge Blais had slipped him a candy bar along with a little bit of sympathy
about his "mediaeval" -- Mr. Justice Blais's words -- prison conditions?
After his son's visit, and as, I have since discovered, after my private
visit with him on July 25, Mr. Zundel was strip searched. He explained to
me what that means. He has to remove his orange prison jump suit and stand
naked in front of a young guard. Then, he has to open his mouth and show the
soles of his feet. Finally, this successful businessman and artist has to
bend over and expose his rear end for further inspection. The procedure is
nothing but vengeful degradation.
http://www.canadianfreespeech.com



In pictures: Iraq uncensored
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/in_pictures/3122169.stm


Bush says war has helped Iraqis, Americans alike
The White House yesterday mounted a spirited defense of US operations in
Iraq since President Bush declared an end to major operations there, saying
that the defeat of Saddam Hussein's regime has benefited Iraqis and
Americans alike.
http://www.boston.com/dailyglobe2/221/nation/Bush_says_war_has_helped_Iraqis
_Americans_alike+.shtml

The Dog Ate My WMDs (6/13/03)
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/061303A.shtml


Slaughtergate (6/23/03)
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/062303A.shtml


Interview with 27-Year CIA Veteran Ray McGovern (6/26/03)
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/062603B.shtml



US shoots two dead at start of softer rule
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1015317,00.html



Violence in Iraq puts kids under house arrest --Watching television the only
option for shut-in children
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2003/08/07/MN294780.DTL


US forces used napalm-like MK-77 firebombs against Iraqi forces in their
drive toward Baghdad last spring, a Pentagon official confirmed today
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/08/08/1060145827920.html



The Insiders Are Coming Out (7/8/03)
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/070803A.shtml


Mr. Bush, You Are A Liar (7/11/03)
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/071103A.shtml


The Dubious Suicide of George Tenet (7/14/03)
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/071403A.shtml




View the NAFTA related job loss for your town or state
To view the complete list, click on the Search Now button without entering
anything.
http://www.citizen.org/trade/forms/Taa_action.cfm

Right now these US Congressmen are junketing in Israel where they are being
briefed on the Middle East by the Sharon government.

l) Alexander + spouse (LA)
2) Berkeley + spouse (NV)
3) Cardoza (CA)
4) Case + spouse (HI)
5) Hill (IN)
6) Israel + spouse (NY)
7) Sheila Jackson Lee (TX)
8) John + spouse (LA)
9) Langevin + two (RI)
10) Larsen (WA)
11) Lucas + spouse (KY)
12) Brad Miller (NC)
13) Nadler + spouse (NY)
14) Hoyer (MD)
15) David Scott + spouse (GA)
16) Gene Green + spouse (TX)
17) Baldwin (WI)
18) Bordallo (Guam)
19) Crowley (NY)
20) Linda Sanchez (CA)
21) Maloney + one (NY)
22) Pallone (NJ)
23) Chris Bell (TX)
24) Kendrick Meek + wife (FL)
25) Jim Marshall + wife (GA)
26) Bud Cramer (AL)
27) Denise Majette + spouse (GA)
28) Artur Davis (AL)
29) Susan Davis + spouse (CA)


Iraqi violence has been a deliberate strategy to slow down the killer hunt
for Baath Party functionaries to ensure they will never return the economy
and infrastructure back to order. But the US hunter squads have been much
too timid and shy of snipers and bombs to carry out their orders. And now,
seeing the writing on the wall, of big cost in casualties versus no dead
Baathists, the Pentagon has given up.
http://www.news.scotsman.com/international.cfm?id=859022003



Jewish father of terrorism victim caught transporting explosives for another
falsified "suicide-bombing" frameup. Yitzhak Pas and Matityahu Shabo were
indicted Friday for carrying and
transporting explosive material in mid-July. Pas, who was best known as the
father of 10-month-old terror victim Shalhevet Pas until he became a suspect
in Jewish terror, and Shabo, his brother-in-law, are charged with
transporting four kilograms of explosive material on July 17. They were
caught with the explosives while traveling in Pas' car from the West Bank
toward Jerusalem.


Israeli government leaves Palestinian child detainees out of prisoner
release.
All together, only 13 children will be released out of a total of 443
prisoners (including criminal prisoners), while around 350 Palestinian
children will remain in Israeli prisons and detention centers.


"If you keep them hungry, they'll do anything for us."



BREAKING A NATION II
William Rivers Pitt

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----



Here's the second half of the William Pitt article. It gives a first hand
acount of what the Zionist administration there is doing to break a proud
Arab nation--with chaos-- "If you keep them hungry, they'll do anything for
us."

Henry
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/072103A.shtml

I spoke last week with a woman named Jodie Evans, long-time peace activist
and organizer of a group called the International Occupation Watch Center,
or IOWC. The purpose of the IOWC is to stand as watchdogs in Iraq over the
corporate contracts being doled out, and to view in person what is happening
to the Iraqi people. "I think that if you were against the war, then you
need to be there," said Evans, "because there is no one in Iraq who is for
the Iraqi people,
and the people know it. They know it."

Evans had just returned from Baghdad. Upon her arrival to the city, she saw
the demonstrable chaos caused by the war, and by the abject failure to
repair the country in the aftermath. "It was 120 degrees, it was dusty, the
air had a haze that makes everything gray," said Evans. "The buildings you
see on the road are bombed out. In some, you can see the fire coming up. In
some, you only see the scaffolding of contorted metal. We got across our
bridge and turned right onto the street we know so well, the one we've
stayed on, and every building was either boarded up or bombed out, including
the United
Nations DP. It was all bombed in, the windows were black from the fire."

"Immediately after we arrived," said Evans, "we hear that it is not only
worse than before the war. It is worse than during the war. People are
upset, people are angry. There were lots of stories about how the Americans
are doing this on purpose. A month after the '91 war, which was much worse
than this one, everything was back and working. Now, the people live in this
chaos they can't even imagine. People can't go outside. Women haven't left
their homes. Lots of people haven't come back from Syria or Kuwait or
wherever they fled to get away from the bombing, because life in Iraq is
unlivable.
There is 65% unemployment, and even the doctors and nurses and teachers who
are going to work don't get paid, so there's no money."

Evans met a number of Americans in Iraq who are part of
the 'rebuilding process.' One such person was in the Compound, a guarded
palace that is now home to Bremer's office and staff along with a number of
other groups. The overall organization is called the Iraqi Assistance
Center, or IAC. The man Evans met was a professor of religion and political
theory at a religious college in America. He
explained that his job was to collect intelligence for Bremer.

"That professor I spoke to, the one doing intelligence for Bremer, I told
him that I had spoken to countless Iraqis and all of them felt this chaos
was happening on purpose," said Evans. "He basically said this was true,
that chaos was good, and out of chaos comes order. So what the Iraqis were
saying - that this madness was all on purpose - this intelligence guy didn't
discredit. He said, 'If you keep them hungry, they'll do anything for us.'"

"I met the man who was hired to create a new civil government in Baghdad, to
bring Baghdad back to order," said Evans. "His name was Gerald Lawson. I
asked him what his background was that allowed him to get this job. He said
he was in the Atlanta Police for 30 years. I
asked how this gave him the ability to create a stable, civil government. He
said he was a manager. I asked him what he knew about Iraqis. He knew
nothing, and didn't care to know anything. He didn't know their history,
their government, didn't speak a word of Arabic and didn't care to learn.
This guy doesn't work for the American government, doesn't work for the
State Department, and doesn't work for the CPA. He works for a corporation
created by ex-Generals. Their job is to create the new Iraqi government
structure."

"We met the man whose job is to make sure the hospitals have what they
need," said Evans. "He is a veterinarian. We met a British guy who showed up
at the Compound gates one day and said he was a volunteer who wanted to
help. The next day he was named the head of
rubbish control in Baghdad, which is a huge problem there because there is
garbage all over the street. I asked him what he had been doing with his
time. He said he'd been hanging out at Odai's palace playing with the lions
and the cheetahs. I met the guy in charge of designing the airport, where
major jumbo jets are supposed to land. He had never designed an airport
before."

"Another man I spoke to associated with this process is named Don Munson,"
said Evans. "His job is civilian affairs policy. He said to me, 'We are
replacing one dictatorship with another.' He's there for two years, and he
works in the palace on the first floor."

"Remember," said Evans, "that the first thing America did was to fire 80,000
police officers. These guys weren't associated with the Hussein regime.
That's like connecting a cop in LA to the Bush administration. All the
people I've talked to over there, the ambassadors and others, said they
warned Bremer not to do that. The cops knew who the criminals were, and
80,000 cops are gone. So now there are these little mafias that run
neighborhoods. With no other work and no way to survive, people are going to
become criminals. The borders are wide open - we didn't even get stopped
when we came in - so everything is just flowing into Iraq."

"A friend of mine's husband is an ambassador," said Evans. "I asked him if
this was normal operating procedure. He said that, basically, no one will
work on this Iraq project who has any respect for their work or career,
because it is so clearly a farce. He said that later we will go in after
these guys have blown it, but right now with Bremer there it is a farce.
Even the press is over there are just shaking their heads and asking, can
anyone fail so badly? Can anybody make so many mistakes? You can't imagine
they can be so dumb."

"One Iraqi woman I spoke to," said Evans, "said she feels like Iraq is a
wounded animal, and everyone is coming in to take their piece of flesh."

The cover-up is one thing, the crime is another. The Bush administration,
mainly in the form of Rumsfeld's Office of Special Plans, disregarded any
and all intelligence which said Iraq was no threat. They supplanted reliable
data with a slew of lies and exaggerations that were fed daily to the
American people and Congress, and got their war. In the aftermath, nothing
is being done for the millions of Iraqi civilians who suffer daily under
their newfound 'liberty.'

American soldiers continue to die. Two more, men from the 101st Airborne,
were killed early Sunday when their convoy was attacked with
rocket-propelled grenades and small arms fire. "You have these young
American soldiers sitting in turrets," said Jodie Evans, "just sitting ducks
for the rage and frustration and vengeance that is coming out."

This is a crime without peer in the annals of American history. The cover-up
currently underway must not be allowed to succeed.

When the American government gets hijacked by extremists like the men
staffing the Office of Special Plans, when intelligence data stating flatly
that Iraq presents no threat to America is disregarded or exaggerated
because the truth does not fit ideological desires, when Congress is lied
to, when the American people are lied to, when innocent civilians at the
sharp end of these lies are left to rot in the dust and the bomb craters on
purpose, when American soldiers are shot down in the street because of these
lies, no kind of cover-up can be allowed to succeed.

The time has indeed come for a reckoning. Let it begin, and let it begin
soon.

The data surrounding this developing story is voluminous, and seems to
change every time an administration representative opens his or her mouth. I
have collected below the last few stories I have written on this subject in
chronological order. Please utilize this data to further your understanding
of this matter.

William Rivers Pitt is the Managing Editor of truthout.org. He is a the
author of two books - "War On Iraq" and "The Greatest Sedition is Silence."



-----

Water! In the sun-scorched compounds occupied by 130,000 Army troops in
Iraq, soldiers have two potential sources of water -- the 400-gallon steel
tank sitting on a trailer in the desert sun or bottled -- or thousands, tens
of thousands - millions of bottles. In Iraq alone, 45 million 1.5-liter
bottles a month, drained and tossed aside -- that runs counter to Defense
Secretary Donald Rumsfeld's drive to make the military lighter and more
agile -- "Spoon-feeding troops bottled water - a mistake, We want them to
have mental toughness" says Army vice chief of staff at the Pentagon,
General Johnathan Keane III.

----

George W. Bush is generally regarded as a 'mangler' of the English
language. What is overlooked is his mastery
of emotional language - especially negatively charged emotional language -
as a political tool. Take a closer look at his speeches and public
utterances, and his political success turns out to be no surprise. It is
the predictable result of the intentional use of language to dominate
others.


President Bush, like many dominant personality types, uses
dependency-creating language. He employs language of contempt and
intimidation to shame others into submission and desperate admiration.


While we tend to think of the dominator as using physical force, in fact
most dominators use verbal abuse to control others. Abusive language has
been a major theme of psychological researchers on marital problems, such
as John Gottman, and of philosophers and theologians, such as Josef
Pieper. But little has been said about the key role it has come to play in
political discourse, and in such "hot media" as talk radio and television.


Bush uses several dominating linguistic techniques to induce surrender to
his will. The first is empty language. This term refers to broad statements
that are so abstract and mean so little that they are virtually impossible
to oppose. Empty language is the emotional equivalent of empty calories.


Just as we seldom question the content of potato chips while enjoying their
pleasurable taste, recipients of empty language are usually distracted from
examining the content of what they are hearing. Dominators use empty
language to conceal faulty generalizations; to ridicule viable
alternatives; to attribute negative motivations to others, thus making them
appear contemptible; and to rename and "reframe" opposing viewpoints.


Bush's 2003 State of the Union speech contained thirty-nine examples of
empty language. He used it to reduce complex problems to images that left
the listener relieved that George W Bush was in charge. Rather than
explaining the relationship between malpractice insurance and skyrocketing
healthcare costs, Bush summed up: "No one has ever been healed by a
frivolous lawsuit."

The multiple fiscal and monetary policy tools that can be used to stimulate
an economy were downsized to: "The best and fairest way to make sure
Americans have that money is not to tax it away in the first place." The
controversial plan to wage another war on Iraq was simplified to: "We will
answer every danger and every enemy that threatens the American people."
In an earlier study, I found that in the 2000 presidential debates Bush
used at least four times as many phrases containing empty language as
Carter, Reagan, Clinton, Bush Senior or Gore had used in their debates.


Another of Bush's dominant-language techniques is personalization. By
personalization I mean localizing the attention of the listener on the
speaker's personality. Bush projects himself as the only person capable of
producing results. In his post- 9/11 speech to Congress he said, "I will
not forget this wound to our country or those who inflicted it. I will not
yield; I will not rest; I will not relent in waging this struggle for
freedom and security for the American people." He substitutes his
determination for that of the nation's.


In the 2003 State of the Union speech he vowed, "I will defend the freedom
and security of the American people." Contrast Bush's "I will not yield"
etc. with John F: Kennedy's "Ask not what your country can do for you, ask
what you can do for your country."


The word "you" rarely appears in Bush's speeches. Instead, there are
numerous statements referring to himself or his personal characteristics -
folksiness, confidence, righteous anger or determination - as the answer to
the problems of the country. Even when Bush uses "we," as he did many
times in the State of the Union speech, he does it in a way that focuses
attention on himself. For example, he stated: "Once again, we are called to
defend the safety of our people, and the hopes of all mankind. And we
accept this responsibility."


In an article in the Jan.16 New York Review of Books, Joan Didion
highlighted Bush's high degree of personalization and contempt for
argumentation in presenting his case for going to war in Iraq. As Didion
writes: "'I made up my mind,' he had said in April, 'that Saddam needs to
go.' This was one of many curious, almost petulant statements offered in
lieu of actually presenting a case. I've made up my mind, I've said in
speech after speech, I've made myself clear. The repeated statements
became their own reason."


Poll after poll demonstrates that Bush's political agenda is out of step
with most Americans' core beliefs. Yet the public, their electoral
resistance broken down by empty language and persuaded by personalization,
is susceptible to Bush's most frequently used linguistic technique:
negative framework. A negative framework is a pessimistic image of the
world. Bush creates and maintains negative frameworks in his listeners'
minds with a number of linguistic techniques borrowed from advertising and
hypnosis to instill the image of a dark and evil world around us.
Catastrophic words and phrases are repeatedly drilled into the listener's
head until the opposition feels such a high level of anxiety that it
appears pointless to do anything other than cower.


Psychologist Martin Seligman, in his extensive studies of "learned
helplessness," showed that people's motivation to respond to outside
threats and problems is undermined by a belief that they have no control
over their environment. Learned helplessness is exacerbated by beliefs that
problems caused by negative events are permanent; and when the underlying
causes are perceived to apply to many other events, the condition becomes
pervasive and paralyzing.


Bush is a master at inducing learned helplessness in the electorate. He
uses pessimistic language that creates fear and disables people from
feeling they can solve their problems.


In his September 20, 2001, speech to Congress on the 9/11 attacks, he chose
to increase people's sense of vulnerability: "Americans should not expect
one battle, but a lengthy campaign, unlike any other we have ever seen ....
I ask you to live your lives, and hug your children. I know many citizens
have fears tonight .... Be calm and resolute, even in the face of a
continuing threat." (Subsequent terror alerts by the FBI, CIA and
Department of Homeland Security have maintained and expanded this fear of
unknown, sinister enemies.) Contrast this rhetoric with Franklin
Roosevelt's speech delivered the day after the Japanese attack on Pearl
Harbor. He said: "No matter how long it may take us to overcome this
premeditated invasion, the American people in their righteous might will
win through to absolute victory .... There is no blinking at the fact that
our people, our territory and our interests are in grave danger. With
confidence in our armed forces - with the 'unbounding' determination of
our people - we will gain the inevitable triumph - so help us God."
Roosevelt focuses on an optimistic future rather than an ongoing threat to
Americans' personal survival.


All political leaders must define the present threats and problems faced by
the country before describing their approach to a solution, but the ratio
of negative to optimistic statements in Bush's speeches and policy
declarations is much higher, more pervasive and more long-lasting than that
of any other President.


Let's compare "crisis" speeches by Bush and Ronald Reagan, the President
with whom he most identifies himself. In Reagan's October 27, 1983,
televised address to the nation on the bombing of the US Marine barracks in
Beirut,he used nineteen images of crisis and twenty-one images of optimism,
evenly balancing optimistic and negative depictions. He limited his
evaluation of the problems to the past and present tense, saying only that
"with patience and firmness we can bring peace to that strife-torn region
and make our own lives more secure."


George W. Bush's October 7, 2002, major policy speech on Iraq, on the other
hand, began with forty-four consecutive statements referring to the crisis
and citing a multitude of possible catastrophic repercussions. The vast
majority of these statements (for example: "Some ask how urgent this
danger is to America and the world. The danger is already significant, and
it only grows worse with time"; "Iraq could decide on any given day to
provide a biological or chemical weapon to a terrorist group or individual
terrorists") imply that the crisis will last into the indeterminate future.
There is also no specific plan of action. The absence of plans is typical
of a negative framework, and leaves the listener without hope that the
crisis will ever end.


Contrast this with Reagan, who, a third of the way into his explanation of
the crisis in Lebanon, asked the following: "Where do we go from here?
What can we do now to help Lebanon gain greater stability so that our
Marines can come home? Well, I believe we can take three steps now that
will
make a difference."

To create a dependency dynamic between him and the electorate, Bush
describes the nation as being in a perpetual state of crisis and then
attempts to convince the electorate that it is powerless and that he is the
only one with the strength to deal with it. He attempts to persuade people
they must transfer power to him, thus crushing the power of the citizen,
the Congress, the Democratic Party, even constitutional liberties, to
concentrate all power in the imperial presidency and the Republican Party.


Bush's political opponents are caught in a fantasy that they can win
against him simply by proving the superiority of their ideas. However,
people do not support Bush for the power of his ideas, but out of the
despair and desperation in their hearts. Whenever people are in the grip of
a desperate dependency, they won't respond to rational criticisms of the
people they are dependent on. They will respond to plausible and forceful
statements and alternatives that put the American electorate back in touch
with their core optimism.


Bush's opponents must combat his dark imagery with hope and restore
American vigor and optimism in the coming years. They should heed the
example of Reagan, who used optimism against
Carter and the "national malaise"; Franklin Roosevelt, who used it against
Hoover and the pessimism induced by the Depression ("the only thing we have
to fear is fear itself"); and Clinton (the "Man from Hope"), who used
positive language against the senior Bush's lack of vision.


This is the linguistic prescription for those who wish to retire Bush in
2004.


Renana Brooks, PhD

[Everyman]

With the downfall of Baghdad and ensuing U.S. occupation, markets for arms,
prostitution and drugs have come out of the dark with the involvement of
children.
http://www.islamonline.net/English/News/2003-08/11/article01.shtml


Noam Chomsky: Preventive War 'the Supreme Crime' Iraq: invasion that will
live in infamy
http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=40&ItemID=4030


The new contingent of Spanish troops being sent to Iraq are wearing the Cruz
de Santiago de Compostela (Cross of St. James of Compostela) on their arm
badgeThe triangular top and arrow-like arms of the cross have become a
symbol of the liquidation of the Muslims who were finally driven out of
Spain after 800 years of fighting by the reconquest in 1492. This was also
the start of the period of colonialist expansion by Spain's Catholic
monarchy. The soldiers are the first batch of 1,300 combat troops that the
Spanish government is sending to Iraq to join the international occupation
force patrolling the Al Qadisija and An Najaf areas, whose population is
overwhelmingly Shiite. They are joining a force of 900 Spanish soldiers
already in Iraq and which, due to anti-war feeling in Spain, were supposedly
sent strictly for humanitarian purposes. The 2,000-strong brigade of which
they will form part, made up of Spanish and Latin American soldiers, will
wear the cross on the arm of their uniforms.
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2003/aug2003/spai-a12.shtml


Iraqi exiles recruited by the Pentagon to help rebuild their homeland are
pressing for a bigger role in reconstruction, saying they have been
sidelined by Americans who view them as foot soldiers, not partners.
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/08/11/1060588320240.html


What would you say to escape Guantanamo? -- Yesterday, quoting unnamed US
officials, The Wall Street Journal said the two Britons were expected to
confess to war crimes, denounce terrorism and assist investigators in
exchange for a firm release date. Officials told the newspaper that they
hoped the deal would show that the tribunals could be used to gain
co-operation from prisoners.
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/story.jsp?story=432887


The promise of oil revenues which US officials had counted on as an
essential component of their plan to rebuild Iraq has not materialized, and
it is beginning to look like it won't for at least two or three more years
at best, even if continuing sabotage can be foiled.
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/EH12Ak02.html


A retired schoolteacher who went to Iraq to serve as a "human shield"
against the U.S. invasion is facing thousands of dollars in U.S. government
fines, which she is refusing to pay.
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines03/0811-08.htm


You might think that reading about a Podunk University's English teacher's
attempt to connect the dots between the poverty of American education and
the gullibility of the American public may be a little trivial, considering
we've embarked on the first, openly-confessed imperial adventure of
senescent capitalism in the US, but bear with me. The question my
experiences in the classroom raise is why have these young people been
educated to such abysmal depths of ignorance. "I don't read," says a junior
without the slightest self-consciousness.
http://www.marchforjustice.com/awarenessforum.php


A specter of the Iran-Contra affair is haunting Washington. Even some of
the people and countries are the same. And the methods - particularly the
pursuit by a network of well-placed individuals of a covert, parallel
foreign policy that is at odds with official policy - are definitely the
same.
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/EH12Ak03.html



British Gurkha mercenary shot dead and British soldiers face wrath of Iraqis
as hatred festers on streets of Basra. Use of Gurkha mercenaries who kill
without blinking and hold all hold life very cheap shows true nature of
British occupation.
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/story.jsp?story=432843


Downing Street's Iraq weapons dossier caused such deep concern among senior
intelligence officers that they formally complained to their superiors, the
Hutton inquiry into the death of David Kelly heard yesterday.
http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/story.jsp?story=432872




Hutton Inquiry into Kelly death at once resembles the US 9-11 National
Commission. ON THE evidence of its first day there seems to be no chance
that the Hutton
inquiry will dare to ask the right questions. But what other recourse
exists?
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,7813-775160,00.html


Each dead scientist had a "piece of the puzzle" in regard to a "target
specific" bio-weapon. Was SARS developed in China, or Israel based on their
compartmentalized contributions? Two American scientists had been engaged
in DNA sequencing that could provide "a genetic marker based on genetic
profiling" needed for weaponized pathogens to hit selected groups of humans"
http://www.rense.com/general40/dead.htm


Communist protestors -- "unemployment activists" -- in Iraq arrested
http://www.wpiraq.org/english


Battle between Likud and the CFR for the minds of the American Jews
http://members.tripod.com/~VaAm/Jul2398.html


US Army Col David Hackworth (Ret) critical of Rumsfeld
http://www.hackworth.com/


A historian credited with predicting the downfall of the Soviet Union in the
1970s now says that the US has been on its way out for the last decade
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article4381.htm


Rice Explains Why You Should Support the Occupation
http://www.lewrockwell.com/rockwell/rice.html


In the early primary polls, leading up to the 2004 presidential election,
Iowa, New Hampshire and California surveys have "Hawk" Joseph Lieberman
running very poorly.
http://www.mediamonitors.net/index.html


Did Condoleeza Rice Warn Willie Brown Not To Fly on Week of 9-11-01?
http://www.sf.indymedia.org/news/2003/08/1634286.php


'Bring us home': GIs flood US with war-weary emails
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1015711,00.html



Bush's 9-11 Secrets
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/081203A.shtml

Shortages Ignite Violence In Iraq
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/081203B.shtml

Officials Warn of Turmoil on Election Night
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/081203C.shtml

Support the troops: Send them home
http://www.unknownnews.net/a080311lf.html


Under Ashcroft, Justice Is Blind and Handcuffed
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/081203D.shtml

Jim Lobe | Iran-Contra, Amplified
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/081203E.shtml

Jimmy Breslin | Limited War In Iraq Is Illusion
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/081203F.shtml

A Debate Over U.S. 'Empire' Builds in Unexpected Circles
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/081203G.shtml


Diplomatic relations between the Bush Administration and China can best
be described as frosty. I'm sure you recall the EP-3 spy plane fiasco
off China's Hainan Island. That EP-3 plane intentionally flew from an
Airbase in Japan instead of using other US Navy Aircraft Carrier spy
planes. According to noted East Asia expert Chalmers Johnson, the
intention is to play Japan and India against China. I'm not sure that
the EP-3 collision with the J-8 fighter jet was really an accident.
However, the Japanese are smart enough not to fall into Washington's
trap and quickly dis-associated themselves by denying any participation
with the EP-3 spy plane flight. Washington has been attempting a divide
and conquer strategy by fomenting divisions between East Asian nations.

Perhaps the Bush Administration should be more relaxed given the huge
potential market of China, but the Bush Administration is primarily composed
of rightwing ideologues closely associated with the Zionist settler movement
in Israel. Several years ago, Paul Wolfowitz and other current
administration insiders composed a document entitled "A Project for a New
American Century (PNAC)". In the document, they called for the establishment
of absolute global hegemony utilizing unilateral American military power.
The overthrow of Iraq was to be followed by Iran, Syria, Saudia Arabia,
Egypt, Libya, Cuba, North Korea and eventually China. As a matter of public
record, Paul Wolfowitz refers to China as "Nazi Germany". The Zionist
movement can be best described as ultra-nationalist fascism. In the Middle
East, PNAC proposes that the United States and Israel jointly share hegemony
over Middle East oil reserves. Assuming Bush's relection, Iran is the next
nation scheduled for regime change according to my friends in Washington. -
Dave C.



But if you understand what neoconservatism is-a brand of liberalism that
likes to masquerade as a phony conservatism, mainly so it can wheedle
influence in the Republican Party-the puzzle is solved. What's especially
interesting about the neo con onslaught against Miss Coulter is that it's
virtually indistinguishable from the liberal one. Nevertheless, if she's
seriously arguing that liberalism is inherently prone to treason, she's
right. Decades ago Whittaker Chambers expressed much the same insight, one
that explains why liberals of his time were so cuddly with Alger Hiss and
almost as mean to Chambers as neo-conservatives today are toward Miss
Coulter. Perceiving that Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal "was only
superficially a reform movement" and really "was a genuine revolution, whose
deepest purpose was not simply reform within existing traditions, but a
basic change in the social, and, above all, the power relationships within
the nation," Chambers also grasped that both the liberals who pushed the New
Deal revolution and the communists who piggybacked on it shared a common
goal, even if they differed on methods. "At the basic point of the
revolution," he wrote, "the two kinds of revolutionists were at one; and
they shared many other views and hopes. For men who could not see that what
they firmly believed was liberalism added up to socialism could scarcely be
expected to see what added up to Communism."
http://www.vdare.com/francis/coulterkampf.htm



The Fraud of Neoconservative "Anti-Communism", by Max Shpak, May 15,
2002:

{quote} Stalin's purges of many of his former Bolshevik colleagues
(including Trotsky, who was assassinated while in exile), his 1939 pact with
Hitler, and rumors of Stalin's own anti-Jewish prejudices gave many would-be
supporters pause. When Hitler invaded the Soviet Union, it became clear the
Russian masses would not fight for the sake of Bolshevism, an ideology that
brought them so much misery, but rather for the sake of Russian blood and
soil. From then on, the Soviet leadership had to court the very Russian
nationalist elements that the early Bolsheviks had worked so hard to stamp
out. This lead to an increasing tolerance towards the Russian Orthodox
Church and a decreased Jewish presence in the Soviet politburo and KGB.
Thus, the USSR was "betraying" the very elements that made it attractive to
the Jewish establishment to begin with.
Perhaps even more significant a factor in the origins of
neoconservatism was the emergence of an independent Israeli state. While
many Jewish Marxists eagerly supported the Zionist state, the more
intellectually consistent Left opposed Zionism on the grounds that all
nationalisms, including Jewish ones, are enemies of global proletarian
revolution. Thus, Jewish leftists who once advocated internationalism for
gentile nations were forced to come to terms with the implications of this
ideology for their own nationalist sentiments. Thus, they needed an ideology
which would let them have their cake (opposing gentile nationalism) and eat
it too (by supporting Israel), and they found just such a worldview with
neoconservatism. ...
http://users.cyberone.com.au/myers/cia-infiltrating-left.html
http://users.cyberone.com.au/myers/toolkit3.html



Techies, Politics Now Click
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/081203H.shtml

Soldiers Emails | Bring Us Home
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/081103A.shtml

Family Shot Dead by Panicking US Troops
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/081103B.shtml

When it was reported that the attempted sale of uranium from Niger to Iraq,
which found its way in a shortened version into the President's State of the
Union speech, was a forgery, the question immediately arose in my mind: who
had done the forging? In all civilized societies forgery is a crime, and
when committed by a private person leads to jail sentences of varying
durations. Afficionados of mystery stories also know that crimes are solved
by considering three factors: Motive, Means, and Opportunity. Remarkably
enough the question of who forged the documents, to the best of my
knowledge, never been raised in our country by the media.
http://www.globe-intel.net/


Basra Protests Continue for Second Day
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/081103C.shtml

Terror Group Seen as Back Inside Iraq
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/081103D.shtml

Powell's Battle Cry Fails Test of Time
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/081103E.shtml

Depiction of Threat Outgrew Supporting Evidence
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/081103F.shtml

Pentagon Office Home to Neo-Con Network
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/081103G.shtml

Protest Groups Planning for Republican Convention
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/081103H.shtml

The Niger Time Bomb
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/081103I.shtml

Tongue-tied Arnie Takes Hits From Left and Right
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/081103J.shtml

https://www.truthout.org/membership/sub_mgmt.php
http://www.truthout.org

William Rivers Pitt | We Stand Our Ground
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/081003A.shtml

Pentagon Officials Met With Discredited Iran/Contra Arms Figure
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/081003B.shtml

US Troops Wounded in Iraq, Attacked in Afghanistan
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/081003C.shtml

Banks Hid Billions to Aviod Taxes
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/081003D.shtml

Belva Ann Prycel | Impeachable Offenses
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/081003E.shtml

Pentagon Plans War in North Korea
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/081003F.shtml

Britain's Iraq Inquiry to Keep Heat on Blair
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/081003G.shtml

Le Monde | Beaten Women
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/081003H.shtml

Iraq Mobile Labs Another Red Herring
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/081003I.shtml

Who Exposed the Whistleblowers Wife?
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/081003J.shtml


Bechtel Accuses Halliburton of Iraqi Oil Monopoly
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/080903A.shtml

U.S. Soldier Killed in Iraq and Embassy Death Toll Rises
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/080903B.shtml

Bush Team Kept Airing Iraq Allegation
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/080903C.shtml

Congressman Henry Waxman | Bush Misuses Science
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/080903D.shtml

Iraq Arms Critic Reacts to Report on Wife
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/080903E.shtml


Washington Pushes the Nuclear Taboo
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/080903I.shtml


High Ranking Pentagon Official Turns Whistle Blower
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/080803B.shtml

Immunity for Iraqi Oil Dealings Raises Alarm
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/080803C.shtml

Bomb Kills 7 at Jordan's Baghdad Embassy
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/080803D.shtml

'Dr Strangeloves' Meet to Plan New Nuclear Era
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/080803E.shtml

Ashcroft Accused of Blacklisting Judges
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/080803F.shtml

Bob Herbert| Despair of the Jobless
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/080803G.shtml

Bert Sacks | Sanctions in Iraq Hurt the Innocent
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/080803H.shtml

Robert Kuttner| The Fruits of Bushonomics
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/080803I.shtml


William Rivers Pitt | The Road Diary, Part I
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/080703A.shtml

Rumsfeld Cautious on Increasing Size of U.S. Military
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/080703B.shtml

Maureen Dowd | Neocon Coup at the Department d'État
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/080703C.shtml

US Soldier Dies in Iraq
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/080703D.shtml

Patriot Act Faces New Challenge In Court
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/080703E.shtml

Ray McGovern | Intelligence Shouldn't Exist Just to Serve Policy
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/080703F.shtml

Voice of Free Iraq Walks Out on US
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/080703G.shtml

Hiroshima Mayor Lashes Bush on Atomic Bomb Anniversary
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/080703H.shtml

The Senegalese Chicken is Debated at the WTO
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/080703I.shtml

Argentina Didn't Fall on Its Own
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/080703J.shtml



PFC Isaac Kindblade | 'We Don't Feel Like Heroes Anymore'
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/080603A.shtml

US Officials Confirm Dropping Firebombs on Iraqi Troops
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/080603B.shtml

14 Killed in Jakarta Hotel Blast
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/080603C.shtml

Eric Margolis | U.S. Wants Saddam, But Dead Not Alive
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/080603D.shtml

U.S. Civilian Contractor Killed in Iraq
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/080603E.shtml

Nicholas D. Kristof | Blood on Our Hands?
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/080603F.shtml

Labor Backs Davis, Urging Democrats Not to Run in Recall
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/080603G.shtml

Paul Krugman | Everything Is Political
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/080603H.shtml

Post by Everyman
Organized Crime in the Administration did 9-11
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/9-11-demonstrative-evidence-of-frameup/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pentagon911/
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/ericbart/index.html
http://www.freedomfiles.org/war
http://www.freedomfiles.org/war/pentagon.htm
http://www.911dossier.co.uk/
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/77_deastman1.htm
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/77_deastman2.htm
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/77_deastman3.htm
http://earth-citizens.net
http://www.ifrance.fr/silentbutdeadly/
http://www.the-movement.com/Hijackers/Agents.htm
http://www.communitycurrency.org/pi.html
http://www.the-movement.com

[Everyman]

So you doubt Flight 77 was a spook plane?


contents:

1) (new) The Moussaoui-Tenet-Boren Connection in Oaklahoma


2) Why were 5 "hijackers" together in an apartment right next door to
National Security Agency Headquarters for several weeks



I T E M 1 :

Clearly the author of the following doesn't realize what he's got --
he is missing too much of the Flight 77 story, too much of the
Oaklahoma City Bombing story, and too much of the spook bin Laden
story for that matter. The older and very brief article, item "2,"
that follows Wright's below, will put things in proper perspecive
within the big picture.

From: APFN (Ken Varden)
To: 9-11 Commission ; APFN Yahoogroups ; APFN SMARTGROUP
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 7:15 AM
Subject: [Quigs_Fight] There Was a 9/11 Terror Cell in Oklahoma


http://disc.server.com/discussion.cgi?id=149495;article=43225;title=APFN



There Was a 9/11 Terror Cell in Oklahoma

Wed Aug 13 11:05:25 2003
64.140.158.58


The Moussaoui-Tenet-Boren Connection
By Michael Phillip Wright (Norman, Oklahoma)

The 9/11 terror cell in Oklahoma
Incredible ! How Dumb Do They Think We Are?

Spin Doctors Now Expect Us to Believe That Al Qaeda Terrorists
Planned to Crash Aircraft Into the White House on Two Separate Days!

How Do We Account for This Madness? Read This for Answers

We have all heard the proverb: "Oh what a tangled web we weave, when
we practice to deceive."

There Was a 9/11 Terror Cell in Oklahoma

http://news.globalfreepress.com/article.pl?sid=03/08/13/0454239

During 2001 Zacarias Moussaoui was an Al Qaeda operative in Norman and
also spent time on the University of Oklahoma campus. He wasn't the
only one. Rohan Gunaratna recognized that there was an Al-Qaeda cell
in the state, when he reported that 9/11 hijacker Nawaf Al Hazmi was
in Oklahoma "to consult with his cell colleagues on April 1, 2001." 15
Other evidence discussed in this document indicates that the cell was
centered in Norman and on the OU campus.

Al Hazmi was also in Oklahoma on April 11, 2001. On that day he was
given a speeding ticket while traveling east on I-40. He was in
Washita county in western Oklahoma driving toward Oklahoma City, which
is 20 miles north of Norman. A copy of the speeding ticket was
published by Newsweek on June 10, 2002. Along with Khalid Almihdhar,
Al Hazmi was one of the two hijackers known by the CIA to have
attended the January 2000 Al Qaeda meeting in Malaysai. 16

Zacarias Moussaoui's Activity in Oklahoma Not Fully Investigated and
Disclosed

Norman is the home of the University of Oklahoma, where Boren is
president. In August 2001, Zacarias Moussaoui, who had attended flight
school in Norman that year before his move to another flight school in
Minneapolis, was detained in Minnesota under suspicion of immigration
violations. He had arrived at the Minnesota school on August 13, for
simulator training on a Boeing 707. Time reported that he expressed a
desire to learn how to fly the 747 in four or five days and did not
want it known that he was a Muslim. 17 Moussaoui triggered suspicion
by announcing his ambition to learn to fly only in mid-air with no
interest in learning how to land or take off.

In December 2001, Moussaoui was indicted by federal authorities and
accused of the following:

1) Conspiracy to commit acts of terrorism
2) Conspiracy to commit air piracy
3) Conspiracy to destroy aircraft
4) Conspiracy to use weapons of mass destruction
5) Conspiracy to commit murder
6) Conspiracy to destroy property

Why Tenet Must Be Held Accountable

On May 17 it was reported that on August 6, 2001, President Bush
received a CIA briefing, approved by Tenet, and indicating that bin
Laden was interested in hijacking aircraft.



National Security advisor Condoleeza Rice stated that the briefing
"mentioned hijacking" but led to the expectation that the terrorists
would "take over an airliner holding passengers and demand the release
of one of their operatives." On May 19, Vice-President Cheney told NBC
News that there was nothing in the August 6 memo which amounted to
"actionable intelligence." He added that the information was only that
"Al-Qaida has a desire to strike us and one possibility is they might
hijack an aircraft." The report did not prepare the President for the
possibility of using American aircraft as suicide bombers to destroy
buildings and kill thousands of people in the U.S.

In addition to the information surfacing on June 3 and June 4, the
failure on the part of the CIA is inexcusable, for these reasons:

1. It was publicly known as early as December 2000 that suicide
airplane crashes were within the reportoire of terror tactics. An AP
story distributed on 12/30/2000 reported a 27-year-old Kenyan having
forced his way into the cockpit of a British Airways jet with the
intention of seizing control of the plane and crashing it.10
Fortunately, he was physically overwhelmed and the aircraft was saved.
The news article reported his motive to be suicide, but obviously he
simultaneously intended to kill everyone on board.

2. On May 17, 2002, the Associated Press described a 1999 federal
report warning the executive branch that Osama bin Laden's terrorists
might hijack an airliner and dive bomb it into the Pentagon or other
government buildings. The report, entitled Sociology-Psychology of
Terrorism, was prepared for the National Intelligence Council and
shared with other federal agencies. The report noted that a terrorist
associated with Al-Qaeda and convicted in the 1993 World Trade Center
bombing had suggested such a suicide jetliner mission. It was the duty
of CIA boss George Tenet to deal with this.

3. The FBI knew for several years before Sept. 11 that al-Qaeda was
training pilots in flight schools in the United States and elsewhere
around the world, according to court records and interviews at flight
schools and with federal law enforcement officials. 11

4. Five months before Sept. 11, the Federal Aviation Administration
warned airlines that Middle Eastern terrorists could try to hijack or
blow up a U.S. plane and that carriers should "demonstrate a high
degree of alertness." 12

5. On July 5, 2001, a Phoenix FBI agent warned the main office in
Washington that Bin Laden could be sending terrorists to flight
schools to use them as pilots on hijacked aircraft. 5

Not long after the 9/11 attack, USA Today ran a feature article
summarizing various failures of the CIA during the time of Tenet's
leadership. Tenet declined to be interviewed for the article, which
called attention to the fact that his "mentor" Boren had urged Bush to
keep him as CIA director after taking office in 2001. USA Today also
described Boren as "Tenet's patron as he rose to the top of the
intelligence community."

Le Figaro Says CIA Let Bin Laden Slip Away in July 2001

GO HERE AND READ THE WHOLE STORY (OUTSTANDING)
http://news.globalfreepress.com/article.pl?sid=03/08/13/0454239


http://www.apfn.org/apfn/OKC_motel.htm


APFN: 9/11 INFO AND LINKS: (BOOKMARK)
Without Justice, their is JUST_US!
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/wtc.htm


=========================

I T E M 2 :

Here is an article that must go hand-in-hand with the above. --DE

Tom Carver of the BBC discovered that five of the hijackers lived in a
motel directly outside the front gates of the NSA, a place which
doesn't officially exist and doesn't even appear on most maps. The
chances of that being a coincidence are astronomical x 10 power
astronomical. Only a handful of people in the entire world would have
any chance ofrecognising Al Queda terrorists, so they find a motel
next door to where they work, the United States National Security
Agency !!!!! These guys were being put up by the NSA, no question in
my mind at all, the smokiest of smoking guns

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/from_our_own_correspondent/2033791.stm

"Nineteen men armed only with box-cutters and their fanaticism
successfully hatched a plot totally unnoticed by America's $40bn a
year intelligence-gathering machine. They succeeded because they
lived and worked, not in the shadows where spies operate, but in full
view. In fact, one of the most bizarre ironies of all this is that
five of the hijackers lived in a motel right outside the gates of the
NSA. Early on the morning of 11 September, when Hani Hanjour and his
four accomplices left the Valencia Motel on US route 1 on their way to
Washington's Dulles airport, they joined the stream of NSA employees
heading to work. Three hours later, they had turned flight 77 around
and slammed it into the Pentagon."

Now doesn't it make sense that Flight 77 had to overfly the Pentagon
and that Flight 77 itself as a spook plane. Whether it makes sense to
you or not, of course, it has been proven beyond reasonable doubt that
that is what happened:

Organized Crime in the Administration did 9-11

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/9-11-demonstrative-evidence-of-frameup/

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pentagon911/


http://perso.wanadoo.fr/ericbart/index.html
http://www.freedomfiles.org/war
http://www.freedomfiles.org/war/pentagon.htm
http://www.911dossier.co.uk/

http://www.apfn.org/apfn/77_deastman1.htm
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/77_deastman2.htm
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/77_deastman3.htm

http://earth-citizens.net
http://www.ifrance.fr/silentbutdeadly/
http://www.the-movement.com/Hijackers/Agents.htm
http://www.communitycurrency.org/pi.html
http://www.the-movement.com

-----------------------





Boom for the merchants of death, Bust for us

by Dick Eastman


Did I ever tell you that I taught microeconomics, macroeconomics,
money and banking, labor economics, and current issues at a four-year
college in washington state in the 90's? During those years I made a
basic discovery that it is once again time to put out on the internet.

It is wrong to say that GDP (the retail value of everything made and
sold or added to inventory that year and services (repairing,
brokering, cutting hair etc.) is a measure in any sense of the well
being or standard of life of the nation.

I would disprove the value of GDP as an indicator of social well being
with this reducto ad absurdum thought demonstration.

Suppose, on the first day of the year everyone but Congress and the
President could died of pneumonia, and suppose Congress then
authorized and the President wrote the check or a company in Mexico to
come in, and bury all the bodies in the Grand Canyon, and say that the
check written as for $6 trillion dollars and that the Mexicans
finished the work in one year. Then, according to national income
accounting, the GDP would be $6 trillion and of course, that means
we'd be doing fine.

Every year the people make an economic pie of goods and serivces. The
standard of life, the quality of the culture, depends on what
particular goods and services go into that pie. Some goods benefit us
now. Some goods add to our producivity in the future. Some "goods"
serve our lusts and actually destroy us. Some are nothing but the
engines of wholesale death.

Since September 11 the master bakers in washingon have been putting a
lot of death into the pie -- because they get first priority on
buying with tax money or with increased national debt etc.

And the fact is that the producers of death are very happy right now
because they are getting a lot of money thrown at them -- the same
way the Mexicans in my ad absurdum got money to bury us all in the
Grand Canyon -- to bankroll a lot of killing. It was only a few
months before the famous (although somewhat cooked) "Surplus" was gone
and big time national debt-financing took over. Remember, lending
money to government is one of those service industries that have been
doing so well, pulling up the average somewhat more than the burger
flippers and telemarketers have done, as you may well suspect.

But if so much of the economic pie is death products that leaves
thinner slices of really good "goods" to pass around. But that is
only have of the bad deal. There is less economic pie of true "good
goods" -- but remember, the economy is not a church picnic where
everyone gets an equal size piece -- rather it is the amount of money
in your pocket that determines how big a slice you will get -- and
who is getting the income flow of money? The producers of death of
course. They are getting rich because although the amount of pie
containing really good goods has diminished, being crowded out by
death production, those being paid top dollar from Uncle Sams purse
of our taxes and more national debt are still able to afford bigger
pieces from a smaller good-goods pie than before.

In short we are making a lot more death products than life products
and more of the life products that are made are going to the producers
of death rather than the common people who are only interested in
better life and the opportunity to create it.

I always have this reality in the back of my mind. It puts in context
the equally horrendous reality that the merchants of death were the
ones who did 9-11.

Dick Eastman
Yakima, Washington
Every man is responsible to every other man.

Remember: Zionism triumphs over Jeffersonianism the only way it can:
in the back. Remember, the US must become exactly the colonial imperialist
power that China hates before the Triad princelings criminals who secretly
control China can move that peace-inclined population to attack the
exhausted and vulnerable Bush-Clinton-Bush weakened and sabotaged US.

Visibly resist this imperialist colonial policy.

Demand justice and an extreme cleaning out of treason and murderous
corruption, of the bi-partisan perpetrators of the 9-11 black-op false-flag
inside-job mass-murder frameup and subsequent fraudulently justified wars
against innocent frameu-victim peoples of Afganistan, Iraq and whoever is
next.

[Everyman]

From: Dick Eastman
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 12:20 PM
Subject: other important items


New evidence from 9/11/01 crashbombing of the Pentagon proves on entirely
new grounds that Flight 77 was not the killer jet. ( see attachment showing
the conclusive evidence of the damage to column #15 and the equally
decisive evidence of interior wall shown still standing between columns 16
and 17 where the offical version of events requires a Boeing engine to have
smashed through.) http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pentagon911/message/10




Imperial wars, then & now Patrick J. Buchanan
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=34063


1000 9/11 victims 'never identified'
http://www.news.com.au/common/story_page/0%2C4057%2C6949759%255E1702%2C00.ht
ml


The Unravelling of Tony Blair -- John Pilger -- Such a high crime does not,
and will not, melt away; the facts cannot be changed. Tony Blair took
Britain to war against Iraq illegally. He mounted an unprovoked attack on a
country that offered no threat, and he helped cause the deaths of thousands
of innocent people. The judges at the Nuremberg Tribunal following world war
two, who inspired much of international law, called this "the gravest of all
war crimes".
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=1004


Hutton's WMD hearings: transcripts available at this website:
http://www.the-hutton-inquiry.org.uk/




Citizens' Indictment can lead to the full investigation and prosecution of
officials in the Bush/Cheney government from Dick Cheney on down. And if
the President is not impeached and tried while in office, he can be indicted
when he leaves the White House.
http://www.IndictBushCheney.org


A company that provided security at the World Trade Center, Washington
D.C.'s Dulles International Airport and United Airlines between 1995 and
2001 was backed by a private Kuwaiti-American investment firm whose records
were not open to full public disclosure, with ties to the Bush family.
http://www.friendsofliberty.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1199


Human shields face 12 years' jail for visiting Iraq
http://www.guardian.co.uk/antiwar/story/0,12809,1017347,00.html
Comment: Right at this moment there are hundreds, if not thousands of
Americans touristing in Cuba against sanctions. Go round them up,
Assholecroft! The country can use the money!
-- Dick Eastman

Two more US troops have come down with pneumonia in the US Central Command's
region, raising to 17 the number severely sickened in the mysterious
outbreak since March, an army spokesman said Tuesday.
http://www.prolog.net/webnews/wed/dr/Qus-iraq-pneumonia.RbnC_DaC.html

Jewish UK national Hemant Lakhani, appeared today in federal court in
Newark, N.J., and was ordered held without bond on charges of attempting to
provide material support and material resources to terrorists and acting as
an arms broker without a license. He will not be going to Guantanamo. Why
not?
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/329224.html
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/wnt/World/missile030813_sting.html


Gangs Of America - The Rise Of Corporate Power and Disabling Of Democracy
http://www.gangsofamerica.com/

Download the book for free[pdf] at:
http://www.gangsofamerica.com/gangsofamerica.pdf


Bush knew Iraq had no WMDs but was so intent on overthrowing Saddam's
regime, setting up a U.S. Puppet government and taking complete control of
the Iraqi oil nothing was going to stop him.
http://g0lem.net/PHP/phpnuke/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=115


William Rivers Pitt | Address to Veterans for Peace (audio)
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/081403A.shtml



Americans Killed as Coalition Faces Fresh Attacks in Iraq
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/081403B.shtml


Flames Shooting From Iraqi Oil Pipeline
http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,1280,-3018303,00.html


Violence Spreads Through Afghanistan, Killing Dozens
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/081403C.shtml


Another odd soldier death -- A soldier attached to the 3rd Armored Cavalry
Regiment
died while sleeping at a base camp in Ar Ramadi on Aug. 12.
http://www.centcom.mil/CENTCOMNews/news_release.asp?NewsRelease=20030828.txt



Families Want U.S. Troops Home From Iraq
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/081403D.shtml



Over objections from some Muslim American groups, President Bush plans to
sidestep Congress and appoint a Middle East scholar who has been derided by
critics as anti-Muslim to a federally funded think tank, congressional
sources said on Tuesday.
http://tinyurl.com/jynl


Three resistance fighters talk about their group and its role in the
developing struggle against the American military presence
http://www.msnbc.com/news/950529.asp?cp1=1



support for the troops who want out of iraq
http://www.bringthemhomenow.org/

The US military is investigating claims that American troops have mistakenly
shot dead at least six Iraqi civilians and two local police officers in
recent days.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/s922112.htm


On April 10, during a pro-war demonstration in New York, Gov. Pataki told a
cheering crowd: "The war started here on Sept. 11, 2001." Like President
Bush, Pataki is just one of countless US officials busy justifying the
invasion of Iraq and promoting the lie that the Iraqis were responsible for
the death of 3,000 people in the World Trade Center. Nobody mentions Osama
Bin Laden anymore. Nobody mentions the fact that half the population of
southern Iraq will die from cancers linked to the use of US uranium-tipped
shells and missiles. Nobody mentions the chaos, lawlessness, looting and
torching prevalent in postwar Iraq under US leadership and occupation. ---
In effect, the ongoing looting and torching of museums, libraries,
universities, schools, hospitals and other cultural and civic institutions
in Iraq is not an attempt at regime change but at culture change.
http://www.arabview.com/article.asp?artid=242


U.S. forces ended a search of an isolated corner of Iraq Tuesday after
troops backed by helicopters and tanks seized stockpiles of weapons army
equipment but no trace of fugitive Iraqi president Saddam Hussein.
http://asia.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&storyID=3263002


Fuel's arrival helps pacify Basra while Bomb leaves 1 U.S. soldier dead, 2
hurt; ambush injures 3
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2003/08/12/MN304311.DTL

The United States officially announced Monday that it is removing all
opposition to Israel's sale of the Phalcon airborne radar system to India.
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/328342.html



'Extremism' in defense of peace is no vice by Justin Raimondo
http://www.antiwar.com/justin/j080603.html






A war fought under false pretences ---The Hutton inquiry has already
answered the crucial question
http://politics.guardian.co.uk/kelly/comment/0,13747,1017450,00.html


Poindexter Resigns
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/081403E.shtml

Five Reported Dead in Fighting in Saudi Capital
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/081403I.shtml


Study of Bush's Psyche Touches a Nerve
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/081403F.shtml


Dead soldiers' families want outside probe
http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20030813-041249-8246r


U.S. Soldiers Discover Islam In Iraq -- "The soldiers came to realize that
the teachings of Islam are absolutely different from fabricated information
propagated by the western media."
http://www.islamonline.net/English/News/2003-08/13/article08.shtml



BAGHDAD, Iraq -- A Shiite Muslim group demanded Thursday that U.S. troops
withdraw from a Baghdad neighborhood within 24 hours, a day after American
forces fired on thousands of protesters in the Shiite enclave and killed at
least one person.

A statement distributed in Sadr City said American forces "deeply regret"
what happened and described it as a mistake. Later, Lt. Gen. Ricardo
Sanchez, commander of coalition forces in Iraq, said troops try to keep
Iraqi culture in mind but must remain aggressive.

In the southern city of Basra, a roadside bomb killed one British army medic
and wounded three others riding in an ambulance, British military spokesman
Capt. Hisham Halawi said. The killing was the first British combat death in
nearly two months.

British troops controlling the south have seen little of the guerrilla
insurgency that has plagued American forces in central Iraq -- though there
has been some unrest: Basra residents rioted over the weekend over
electricity cuts and gas shortages.

Eight Britons have been killed in combat since May 1, President Bush
declared major fighting over. In the same period, 60 American soldiers have
died in guerrilla attacks, blamed on mainly Sunni followers of Saddam
Hussein.

The protest in Baghdad on Wednesday erupted when thousands of Shiites in the
neighbhorhood of Sadr City gathered around a telecommunications tower where
they said American forces in a helicopter tried to tear down an Islamic
banner.

U.S. military spokesman Sgt. Danny Martin said Wednesday the banner was
apparently blown down by rotor wash from a Black Hawk helicopter. He said
American troops killed one person and wounded four after a rocket-propelled
grenade was fired at them. No U.S. soldiers were reported hurt.

"What occurred was a mistake and was not directed against the people of Sadr
City," said a statement signed by Lt. Col. Christopher K. Hoffman of the 2nd
Squadron, 2nd Armored Cavalry Regiment. The document, in English, was being
distributed in the sprawling slum Thursday. "I am personally investigating
this incident and will punish those that are responsible."

Amateur video obtained by Associated Press Television News showed a Black
Hawk helicopter hovering a few feet from the top of the telecommunications
tower and apparently trying to tear down the banner. Later, U.S. Humvees
drove by and the crowd threw stones at them. Heavy gunfire could be heard
and demonstrators were seen diving to the ground.

Sanchez, commander of coalition forces in Iraq, insisted the rotor wash blew
down the banner, and said coalition troops try to keep Iraqis' "culture and
sensitivities" in mind.

"There is no policy on our part to fly helicopters to communication towers
to take down flags," he told reporters. "Tearing down implies the physical
act of the part of the soldier."

He said investigators would try to figure out what happened.

"What I will tell you is, we've got a mission that we've got to accomplish
here in the country," he said. "We'll let the investigation ... run its
course, and then if it was a mistake, I'll come back and tell you whether it
was or not."

Al-Sadr, a Shiite religious group, demanded that the U.S forces halt all
helicopter flights over the neighborhood, give an official apology and
provide compensation to victims of the shooting, said Qais al-Khaz'ali, a
representative of the group in Sadr City.

Al-Khaz'ali said in a statement the group was giving U.S. forces a one-day
ultimatum to meet the demands, "otherwise we are not responsible for
whatever reactions the U.S. soldiers might face if they entered the city."

"We urge you (the people of the city) to resort to peace until our demands
are met. ... Nobody is allowed to carry weapons," the statement said,
calling the Americans tyrants and troublemakers.

Al-Sadr is led by Muqtada al-Sadr, the son of a revered Shiite ayatollah who
was killed by Saddam's regime in 1999. Al-Sadr, who is based in the holy
city of Najaf, has strong influence in Sadr City, particularly among poor
and unemployed young men.

"We're peaceful people, but one edict (from the imams) and the entire
American army will become our prisoner," said Hassan Azab, a member of the
local district council.

Hoffman's statement said the number of U.S. helicopters flying over the slum
and the number of patrols in the eastern Baghdad neighborhood, formerly
known as Saddam City, would be reduced.

Also Thursday, Sanchez said that U.S. forces had discovered three major
ammunition caches in the previous 24 hours.

He also told of a growing problem of oil smuggling. He said about $200,000
worth of oil was being stolen each day and smuggled across the southern
border. He said some of the 15 breaches of oil pipelines since late May had
been done by smugglers trying to tap into the flow.

Iraq began pumping crude oil from its northern oil fields Wednesday for the
first time since the war.

Iraq sits atop the world's second-largest proven crude reserves, and oil
exports are vital to its postwar reconstruction and the success of U.S.
efforts to implant democracy in the country. Before the war halted Iraq's
oil production, the country pumped around 2.1 million barrels a day, most of
it for export.

Analysts said it was unclear how reliable the flow of oil from fields near
the northern Iraqi city of Kirkuk might prove to be.

Saboteurs and looters have dogged efforts to rehabilitate the 600-mile
pipeline from Kirkuk to the Turkish city of Ceyhan. The lack of storage and
export facilities forced the Iraqis to re-inject much of the oil back into
underground reservoirs.

Guerrillas killed two American soldiers, the military reported Wednesday,
while two Iraqi civilians were killed after attacking U.S. soldiers in
separate incidents north of Baghdad.



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

What the dickens is wrong with these ingrates anyway?



Why don't they appreciate their newfound freedoms as Comrade Bremer has
explained to them? After all, now they have the freedom to go without power.
They have the freedom to go without jobs or food, thus giving them plenty of
free time to slim down for the fall fashions. They have the freedom to
refrain from protesting, for their safety of course because it is dangerous
out there on the streets. They have the freedom to have their homes raided
by mercinaries pumped up on Wagnerian Opera music. It's always such a joy to
watch your wife and kids down on their knees crying and begging for mercy.
And the best thing about freedom is getting pushed face down in the dirt,
hogtied with a bag shoved over your head in the 120 degree heat. Now THAT is
freedom I say. And they have the freedom to have their property and their
guns confiscated, which they can do without and to be picked off by crack
British sniper teams. Always a plus in a free society. And they have the
freedom to have their families get shot to pieces at frequent checkpoints.
Hell, America doesn't even have all these freedoms...

yet....

Paul Walker





Israel prepare to bomb Iran's Bushehr nuclear power station
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A52278-2003Aug12


US Troop Commander: No Tickets Home For Year or Longer
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/081303A.shtml


Sick Veteran Battles Bureaucracy Back Home
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/081303B.shtml

[Everyman]

DONALD RUMSFELD, HEAD OF US JEWISH MAFIA, ANSWERS QUESTION ABOUT AFGHANISTAN
OPIUM PRODUCTION


This is how the man who allied himself with the Norther Alliance opium
druglords to overthrow the anti-drug Taliban responds to a question about
astronomical rise in opium production in Afghanistan following the overthrow
of the legitimate Afghanistan government of Mullah Mohammed Omar, which had
successfully erradicated opium from all Afganistan lands not controlled by
the China-backed Northern Alliance drug lords.

Remember that the opium is sent over the old silk road, at "the top of the
world," into China, where the peoples liberation army, controlled by the
Triad princelings, processs it into Chinese heroin which is sold around the
world where it nets revenues of $2 trillion. This money is then laundered
into Wall Street, City of London, Shanghai, Hong Kong investment banks
(called "merchant banks" in some of these countries) where it is then
invested in huge penny-labor factories in China -- that puts all middle
class businesses around the world out of business.

I cannot impress on you how much of a motive this was for the Zionist Mafia
in the Bush Administration to plan and execute the mass-murder false-flag
frameup of September 11, 2001.

I should add that at one point commanders in the field were seeking to
destroy opium fields of the Northern Alliance, but were stopped by superiors
who insisted that this was not the mission of the American Forces.

Also, below Rumsfeld brushes off the problem of cheap opium and heroin
because most of the product, he says, goes to Europe and Russia. But
Rumsfeld must know that there is not industry more entrepreneurial than a
black market industry, that opium and heroin supply will seek the best
prices -- which could be here. [And of course all people should be
concerned about the drug trade around the world -- every man is responsible
to every other man -- excpet men of Donald Rumsfeld's mindset.] And if the
supply is increased in one area, prices will go down in all areas (due to
arbitrage) -- and heroin and its derivatives will be cheaper and more
plentiful on our streets too.

We see the criminals rationalization in Rumsfeld, with the dishonest dodge
that the heroin is not coming to the US -- when in fact it is.

And notice too that Rumsfeld sounds exactly like Janet Reno when he says
that drugs are exclusively a "demand" problem!!!! That means that he is not
at all in favor of fighting the drug trade, not really!!!! And, despite
whatever you have heard, drugs are 10 million times the threat that Moslem
Fundamentalism ever was.

Rumsfeld is a mass-murderer and a prince of the Jewish Mafia.

I am happy to give my life in writing this to you for just the hope that
him and all his gang (Wolfowitz, Perle etc.) may one day be nailed by the
uprising of informed people hungry for justice and to be set free from their
current enslavement.

Dick Eastman
Yakima, Washington
Every man is responsible to every other man.
=======================================

Q:
Thank you. My question concerns itself with the opium production in
Afghanistan. It's been reported that it's higher than it was before
coalition forces entered Afghanistan a couple of years ago. And as a
result, the price of heroin is dropping around the world. I was wondering
if you could relate to us what the coalition is going to do, and will do in
the future to eradicate this dangerous drug from Afghanistan?


Rumsfeld:



It's an important question. The opium production in Afghanistan has gone up
and down over the years, and you're right, it currently is up from, I guess,
three years ago or so. And your question is what's the coalition going to
do about it? The United States has offered to help the U.K. As you know,
the bulk of the Afghanistan materials go into Europe and Russia, as opposed
to the United States. The U.K. has kind of taken the lead, because they
have had the greatest concern about it.



And you ask what we're going to do, and the answer is, I don't really
know. I think it's an awfully tough problem.



I -- my impression is that in a very real sense it's a demand problem.
It's a problem that there are a lot of people who want it, a lot of people
with money who will pay for it, a lot of people who steal from others to pay
for it, and that you can squeeze it down in one country to zero and you
don't change at all at the amount of the product that ends up in Europe or
the United States, because it's demand that determines how much is going to
get in there. You push it down in one country, and it goes up in another
country. You push it down in four countries, and the price goes up because
there's a shortage, and the higher the price, the greater the willingness of
people to take risk, the greatest -- greater the willingness of people to
buy the kinds of things they need to hide what they're doing and to protect
them as they transport these materials. And it is a -- it's a vicious
cycle.



So I know that the Karzai government's concerned about it. I know the
United States government and the other coalition partners are. And I know
they've tried various eradication methods, and they've tried to buy crops.
They've tried to buy people out from planting crops. And what they find is
that the value is high. Therefore, what you have to pay is high, and
sometimes people don't stay bought, if you will. You can pay them, and you
turn around, and you find that unless you've got some sort of a massive
monitoring system, that they -- they're doing it somewhere else, in a
neighboring plot. And it is a whale of a tough problem.



And I -- I'm afraid that the ultimate solution for that is going to be
on the part of -- is going to be probably found by attacking it in all
directions, not just the supply side, but the education and the demand side
as well. I wish I had a quicker, better, easier answer, because it's a
vicious problem.""