TIME TO DEBATE THE HOLOCAUST

[Garlon3A]

some say its time to have a real debate about the holocaust....as if for
over the last 55 years there has been no discussion or debates as to what
really happened.

the problem with debating the holocaust is that the holocaust deniers are
not willing to listen to the evidence from the other side. if historians
show them evidence of eye witness accounts to gas chambers, mass shootings,
mass graves, they disregard them as communist spies or zionist double
agents. if you show them population statistics showing a average loss of
arounf 6 million jews between 1938 and 1945...they denounce the providers of
the statistics as jewish conspirators or soviet propagandanists.

the point is, holocaust deniers dont want to really debate the
holocaust..they know they would lose. they want a one side slugfest where
wild accusations are thrown, legitimate sources are discredited and
insulted, and accepted facts are thrown out as politically motivated or
hiersay. thats a debate worthy of fox news....not the the usa or the world.

holocaust deniers are motivated not by a need to find the truth, but by
hatred and mistrust of the jews. its that simple. show me a holocaust
denier who likes jews..and Ill show you a pig with wings.

[mandela]

hey galron thanks for pointing out your views in point form several of which i don't agree with
but I assign that to your own lack of sight relative to mine.

as for this holocaust business there are basically three types of "believers"

1.those who deny holocaust and deny that millions of Jews were killed
2.and those who deny the holocaust as its known but do not deny that millions of Jews were
killed
3. those who accept everything as it is portrayed under the term "holocaust"

there is a difference and I will have to leave it at that for the time being and I don't like
crossposting but would be happy to keep reading how this point evolves in SCI

some say its time to have a real debate about the holocaust....as if for over the last 55
years there has been no discussion or debates as to what really happened.
the problem with debating the holocaust is that the holocaust deniers are not willing to
listen to the evidence from the other side. if historians show them evidence of eye witness
accounts to gas chambers, mass shootings, mass graves, they disregard them as communist spies
or zionist double agents. if you show them population statistics showing a average loss of
arounf 6 million jews between 1938 and 1945...they denounce the providers of the statistics as
jewish conspirators or soviet propagandanists.
the point is, holocaust deniers dont want to really debate the holocaust..they know they would
lose. they want a one side slugfest where wild accusations are thrown, legitimate sources are
discredited and insulted, and accepted facts are thrown out as politically motivated or
hiersay. thats a debate worthy of fox news....not the the usa or the world.
holocaust deniers are motivated not by a need to find the truth, but by hatred and mistrust of
the jews. its that simple. show me a holocaust denier who likes jews..and Ill show you a pig
with wings.